Fruit drinks100 g vs 100 gTwo cited FDC recordsUpdated

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C: regular vs light USDA FDC 2710580 vs 2710585

Per 100 g, regular reports 11.4 g carbohydrate, while light reports 4.7 g carbohydrate.

The comparison uses two cited USDA records. Their complete source names, household portions, nutrient values, and FoodData Central links remain visible below.

Record A · FDC 2710580

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Record B · FDC 2710585

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Highlighted difference

Calories at the same 100-gram weight

Bar length shows the two cited values on one shared denominator. It does not rank either food or establish why they differ.

  1. 46 kcal
  2. 19 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kcal

Equal-weight evidence

Nutrition per 100 grams

Both columns use the same mass, which compares nutrient concentration without allowing the two representative source amounts to change the denominator. “A +” or “B +” reports the arithmetic difference between the cited values; it is not a quality score.

On smaller screens, focus a comparison table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Per-100-gram nutrient comparison for Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C and Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light
NutrientA · Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin CB · Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C…Difference
CaloriesMaterial difference 46 kcal 19 kcal A +27 kcal
Protein 0.1 g 0.1 g No difference at displayed precision
Total fat 0.1 g 0 g A +0.1 g
CarbohydrateMaterial difference 11.4 g 4.7 g A +6.7 g
Dietary fiber 0.1 g 0.1 g Same reported value
Total sugarsMaterial difference 10.7 g 4.6 g A +6.1 g
Sodium 8 mg 5 mg A +3 mg
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g No difference at displayed precision
Potassium 122 mg 45 mg A +77 mg
Calcium 3 mg 10 mg B +7 mg
Iron 0.3 mg 0.1 mg A +0.2 mg

Values come from the two cited USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods records. Feast does not average records, impute missing values, or infer a nutrient from the food name.

Read the table by question

Every material primary-nutrient difference on this page is numerically higher in A (3 of 3).

These answers describe concentration per 100 grams. “More” and “less” identify the arithmetic direction only; they do not decide which record is a better match or which food is better for a person.

Which reports fewer calories?

Record B

Record B reports 19 kcal, compared with 46 kcal in the other record—a difference of 27 kcal.

Which reports more protein?

Same reported value

Both records report 0.1 g of protein per 100 g.

Which reports more fiber?

Same reported value

Both records report 0.1 g of fiber per 100 g.

Which reports less sodium?

Record B

Record B reports 5 mg, compared with 8 mg in the other record—a difference of 3 mg.

What differs in the source descriptions

The exact names carry information the numbers cannot.

USDA assigns both records to “Fruit drinks,” but the topic label is broad. Record A is “Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C.” Record B is “Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light.” Feast paired them because their contrast-neutral food identities are an exact match, not merely because they share a generic category.

The controlled name parser found 1 interpretable distinction. These labels organize wording already present in the names; they do not establish that a distinction caused a nutrient difference.

Controlled wording distinctions
Description dimensionRecord ARecord B
Light wordingNo matching controlled term in the source namelight wording

Even a clean name contrast can carry hidden companions. A fried record may also include coating; a restaurant record can use a different recipe; a reduced-sodium description can differ in more than salt; and a source amount can reflect a different reporting convention. That is why this page reports the complete pair rather than treating one word as an intervention.

Portion context

A representative source amount is not a shared “serving.”

Record A uses USDA reference amount at 248 g. Record B uses USDA reference amount at 240 g. Those labels and gram weights come from their respective records. They are useful for scaling the chosen profile, but they are not recommendations and need not describe equal amounts.

The representative amounts do not cross Feast’s material portion-difference threshold of both 15 grams and 20%. They are still separate source measures, so the 100-gram table remains the appropriate place for an equal-weight comparison.

A cup, piece, slice, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can have different gram weights across records. A matching label is not enough: check the listed grams. If accuracy matters more than convenience, weighing the food or using a current package label can be more specific than a generic survey-food measure.

Record A measures

  • 1 fl oz (no ice)31 g
  • 1 fl oz (with ice)23 g
  • 1 fl oz (NFS)31 g
  • 1 fun size box (4.23 fl oz)131 g
  • 1 juice box/pouch (6.75 fl oz)209 g
  • 1 Kool-Aid Jammers pouch186 g
  • 1 child/senior drink279 g
  • 1 small drink372 g
Scale record A →

Record B measures

  • 1 fl oz (no ice)30 g
  • 1 fl oz (with ice)23 g
  • 1 fl oz (NFS)30 g
  • 1 Kool-Aid Jammers pouch180 g
  • 1 bottle (10 fl oz)300 g
  • USDA reference amount240 g
Scale record B →

One shared household label

1 fl oz (no ice): 31 g in A vs 30 g in B

The household label matches, but the source gram weights differ. These values scale each record by its own listed grams; they are practical portion context, not an equal-mass comparison.

Nutrition for one 1 fl oz (no ice) using each record’s own source gram weight
NutrientA · 31 gB · 30 g
Calories14 kcal6 kcal
Protein0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sodium2 mg2 mg

USDA source formulation evidence

The listed inputs provide another way to audit the match.

FNDDS includes input-food rows behind each standardized survey-food record. Record A’s leading listed inputs include Beverages, fruit juice drink, greater than 3% juice, high vitamin C. Record B’s include Beverages, cranberry-apple juice drink, low calorie, with vitamin C added. Ingredient-code overlap is 0%, and normalized listed-input-weight variation is 100%.

Record A · 1 coded input

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C

  1. Beverages, fruit juice drink, greater than 3% juice, high vitamin CIngredient code 14651
    100% of listed input weight

Record B · 1 coded input

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light

  1. Beverages, cranberry-apple juice drink, low calorie, with vitamin C addedIngredient code 43404
    100% of listed input weight

0 shared coded inputs

The two listed formulations do not share an ingredient code in this source extract. Shared codes can still carry different listed weights.

1 A-only and 1 B-only coded inputs

A-only entries include Beverages, fruit juice drink, greater than 3% juice, high vitamin C. B-only entries include Beverages, cranberry-apple juice drink, low calorie, with vitamin C added.

Important: repeated rows carrying the same ingredient code are combined before the shares and overlap are calculated. These weights belong to USDA’s source formulation: they are not a reconstructed plate, final cooked yield, visitor serving, ingredient declaration, or estimate of what is visible in a photo. USDA’s FNDDS documentation explains that these calculation recipes can represent multiple variants, may include retention or moisture adjustments, and are not product-label ingredient lists.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Choosing the closer record

Match context first; scale second.

  1. 01

    Read both names literally

    Compare cooking method, coating, edible skin or peel, sauce, additions, venue, source form, and food subtype. For this pair, the full A and B descriptions above are the evidence—not shortened search labels.

  2. 02

    Use listed inputs as a check

    If the name still leaves ambiguity, compare the leading and unique source inputs. They can reveal that two near names refer to meaningfully different standardized formulations, but they do not reconstruct your dish.

  3. 03

    Choose an amount for that record

    After choosing A or B, use its own named measure and gram weight. Do not transfer a cup, slice, or “typical amount” from the other record as if the measures were interchangeable.

  4. 04

    Account for missing details

    Brand, current restaurant recipe, cooking oil, drained weight, toppings, substitutions, and unfinished portions may not be captured. A label or weighed recipe can supersede a generic reference when it better matches the actual food.

Limits and responsible interpretation

This is a comparison of records, not a causal study.

The two records come from 2021–2023 FoodData Central Survey Foods data. The nutrient table faithfully compares their published values on the same weight basis. It does not measure two plates prepared at the same time, isolate one ingredient, or estimate the uncertainty around either value.

For this pair, the source names differ across 1 documented description dimension, while the listed formulations show 0% ingredient-code overlap and 100% normalized listed-weight variation. Moisture, ingredient proportions, preparation, and record construction can therefore move together. The page can describe the combined record difference; it cannot isolate the effect of one word.

A higher or lower number is not an overall verdict. Protein, fiber, sodium, energy, fat, micronutrients, preferences, allergies, budget, portion, and an individual’s goals answer different questions. Feast therefore reports directions and magnitudes without applying a universal “healthier” label.

This page is educational and does not diagnose a condition, prescribe a target, or replace advice from a qualified professional. For an allergy, medically directed diet, or strict ingredient limit, use verified ingredient information and guidance appropriate to that situation.

How this page qualified

A page is published only when the pair clears materiality and diversity gates.

Both records must occupy the same USDA survey-food topic and share a close food identity after a controlled vocabulary separates preparation, edible-part, source, claim, crust, and sauce wording. Exact contrast-neutral identities receive priority. Close ingredient or form substitutions can qualify when name overlap remains high and the numerical evidence is material.

For primary nutrients, Feast requires both an absolute and relative difference: at least 20 kcal and 12% for energy; 2 g and 18% for protein or fat; 5 g and 15% for carbohydrate; 1 g and 20% for fiber; 4 g and 20% for sugars; or 100 mg and 20% for sodium. A focused one-nutrient pair also needs a material representative-amount or formulation distinction. Rounding-only pairs are not published.

Unordered FDC IDs define a canonical pair, so reversing A and B cannot create another page. Each source record can appear twice at most, each USDA topic contributes no more than 40 pages, and closely repeated identity families are capped. Those rules produced a selective comparison library rather than every mathematical combination in the corpus.

Read the complete nutrition-page methodology for import, nutrient mapping, portion scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C versus Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C is higher in calories per 100 g

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C reports 46 kcal versus 19 kcal for Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light: a 27 kcal difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Check the weight before comparing serving totals

Source amounts span 240–248 g

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light uses USDA source amount (240 g), while Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C uses USDA source amount (248 g). Use per 100 g for equal-weight composition; use the serving column only when those named source amounts answer your question.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C” from “Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C versus Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Fruit juice drink

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C and Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calories runs from 19 kcal in Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light to 46 kcal in Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
2 context records in this source topic Fruit drinks

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C and Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 3 mg in Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C to 10 mg in Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Inspect an exact record Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710580 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path
Check another exact record Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710585 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path
2 records share this broad food family Beverages: broader category context

Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C and Fruit juice drink, with high vitamin C, light are assigned to Feast’s Beverages editorial category. Use the category page to compare nearby foods at a broad level; keep the exact USDA descriptions on this page for record-level decisions.

Follow this evidence path