Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Mayonnaise-type salad dressing calories per cup: 367–588 across all 2 named USDA examples

Across all 2 named USDA examples, a cup contains 367–588 calories. Their listed weights span 232–235 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 10 g

25calories

Mayonnaise-type salad dressing

Protein
0.1 g
Carbs
1.5 g
Fat
2.2 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710207 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 2 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 2 exact records in this guide report 16–25 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 158–250 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, begin by separating “Mayonnaise-type salad dressing” from “Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 2 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How mayonnaise-type salad dressing records compare at 100 grams

All 2 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light 158 kcal
    158 kcal
  2. Mayonnaise-type salad dressing 250 kcal
    250 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 2 named USDA records in view: 2 direct matches. All sit within “Mayonnaise.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 2 records together under the exact grouping key “mayonnaise type salad dressing.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, this page can compare 2 named records from FDC 2710207 through FDC 2710222. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

A shared 10 g comparison anchor

Equal source weights make the selected Mayonnaise-type salad dressing serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.

Composition

92 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “light”; the higher is “Mayonnaise-type.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

180 mg sodium gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “Mayonnaise-type” (653 mg) and “light” (833 mg).

Observed source examples

Both records, with their own serving weights intact

These 2 records each use a 10 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every mayonnaise-type salad dressing; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.

Important: “Lower” begins with Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light; “higher” ends with Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every mayonnaise-type salad dressing meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Mayonnaise-type salad dressing nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Mayonnaise-type salad dressing Direct name match 10 gUSDA reference amount 25 kcal 250 0.1 g 0 g 65 mg FDC 2710207 ↗
Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light Direct name match 10 gUSDA reference amount 16 kcal 158 0.1 g 0 g 83 mg FDC 2710222 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

Every selected record uses a 10-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 16 calories for “light” to 25 for “Mayonnaise-type.” At a fixed 100 grams, “light” is 158 calories and “Mayonnaise-type” is 250—a fixed-weight separation of 92 calories. For Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “Mayonnaise-type” and “light”. The source formulations contain 2 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include salad dressing, mayonnaise type, regular, with salt and salad dressing, mayonnaise-type, light. On this Mayonnaise-type salad dressing page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Mayonnaise-type salad dressing” cannot resolve the differences between Mayonnaise-type salad dressing and Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    A shared source weight

    Every selected record uses 10 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “Mayonnaise-type” and “light”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    2 source-input codes appear across the selected records. Their presence and listed weights describe USDA formulations, not finished plated proportions.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Mayonnaise-type salad dressing” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Mayonnaise-type salad dressing unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that mayonnaise-type salad dressing is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“Mayonnaise-type” and “light”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Mayonnaise-type salad dressing source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Mayonnaise-type salad dressing source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Mayonnaise-type salad dressing is higher in total fat per 100 g

Mayonnaise-type salad dressing reports 21.6 g versus 10 g for Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light: a 11.6 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

2 listed servings each weigh 10 g

The 2 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 10 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Choose the record before reading the number

Mayonnaise-type salad dressing and Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light are not interchangeable

The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes Light wording (No matching controlled term in the source name versus light wording) the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Mayonnaise-type salad dressing source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Compare two records on this page Mayonnaise-type salad dressing vs Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light

Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Light wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus light wording; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Salad dressing, mayonnaise type, regular, with salt

USDA input 4018 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic Mayonnaise

Mayonnaise-type salad dressing and Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Mayonnaise-type salad dressing

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710207 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calories runs from 158 kcal in Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light to 250 kcal in Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710222 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 653 mg in Mayonnaise-type salad dressing to 833 mg in Mayonnaise-type salad dressing, light, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path