Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Soft drink, pepper type calories per bottle (16.9 fl oz or 500 ml): 5–220 across all 4 named USDA examples

Across all 4 named USDA examples, a bottle (16.9 fl oz or 500 ml) contains 5–220 calories. Their listed weights span 507–524 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 can (12 fl oz) · 372 g

156calories

Soft drink, pepper type

Protein
0 g
Carbs
38.7 g
Fat
0.9 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710545 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 4 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 4 exact records in this guide report 4–156 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 1–42 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Soft drink, pepper type, begin by separating “Soft drink, pepper type” from “Soft drink, pepper type, diet.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 4 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How soft drink, pepper type records compare at 100 grams

All 4 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated, diet 1 kcal
    1 kcal
  2. Soft drink, pepper type, diet 2 kcal
    2 kcal
  3. Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated 41 kcal
    41 kcal
  4. Soft drink, pepper type 42 kcal
    42 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 4 named USDA records in view: 4 direct matches. They span 2 source categories, including Soft drinks and Diet soft drinks. The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first two description segments” placed these 4 records together under the exact grouping key “soft drink pepper type.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Soft drink, pepper type, this page can compare 4 named records from FDC 2710545 through FDC 2710546. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

360–372 g before composition

The largest source amount is 1.0× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.

Composition

41 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “pepper type, decaffeinated, diet”; the higher is “pepper type.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

0.1 g protein gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “pepper type” (0.0 g) and “pepper type, decaffeinated, diet” (0.1 g).

Observed source examples

Three landmarks inside this source set—not universal endpoints

The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every soft drink, pepper type.

Important: “Lower” begins with Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated, diet; “higher” ends with Soft drink, pepper type, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every soft drink, pepper type meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Soft drink, pepper type, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Soft drink, pepper type nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Soft drink, pepper type Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 156 kcal 42 0 g 0 g 11 mg FDC 2710545 ↗
Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 153 kcal 41 0 g 0 g 15 mg FDC 2710547 ↗
Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated, diet Direct name match 360 gUSDA reference amount 4 kcal 1 0.4 g 0 g 14 mg FDC 2710548 ↗
Soft drink, pepper type, diet Direct name match 360 gUSDA reference amount 7 kcal 2 0.4 g 0 g 29 mg FDC 2710546 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

The listed source amounts run from 360 to 372 grams—a 12-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 4 calories for “pepper type, decaffeinated, diet” to 156 for “pepper type.” At a fixed 100 grams, “pepper type, decaffeinated, diet” is 1 calories and “pepper type” is 42—a fixed-weight separation of 41 calories. For Soft drink, pepper type, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “pepper type”, “pepper type, decaffeinated”, “pepper type, decaffeinated, diet”, and “pepper type, diet”. The source formulations contain 4 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include beverages, carbonated, cola, regular, beverages, carbonated, cola, without caffeine, beverages, carbonated, low calorie, cola or pepper-type, with aspartame, contains caffeine, and beverages, carbonated, low calorie, cola or pepper-type, with aspartame, without caffeine. On this Soft drink, pepper type page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Soft drink, pepper type” cannot resolve the differences between Soft drink, pepper type and Soft drink, pepper type, diet. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    Source weight before serving calories

    The source amounts span 360–372 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “pepper type”, “pepper type, decaffeinated”, “pepper type, decaffeinated, diet”, and “pepper type, diet”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    4 source-input codes appear across the selected records. Their presence and listed weights describe USDA formulations, not finished plated proportions.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Soft drink, pepper type” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Soft drink, pepper type unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that soft drink, pepper type is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“pepper type”, “pepper type, decaffeinated”, “pepper type, decaffeinated, diet”, and “pepper type, diet”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Soft drink, pepper type source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 4 exact records behind Soft drink, pepper type source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated is higher in total sugars per 100 g

Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated reports 10.6 g versus 0 g for Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated, diet: a 10.6 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Check the weight before comparing serving totals

Source amounts span 360–372 g

Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated, diet uses USDA source amount (360 g), while Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated uses USDA source amount (372 g). Use per 100 g for equal-weight composition; use the serving column only when those named source amounts answer your question.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Soft drink, pepper type” from “Soft drink, pepper type, diet”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Soft drink, pepper type source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, carbonated, cola, regular

USDA input 14148 appears in 1 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, carbonated, low calorie, cola or pepper-type, with aspartame, contains caffeine

USDA input 14416 appears in 1 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calories runs from 1 kcal in Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated, diet to 42 kcal in Soft drink, pepper type, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic Diet soft drinks

Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated, diet and Soft drink, pepper type, diet belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic Soft drinks

Soft drink, pepper type and Soft drink, pepper type, decaffeinated belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 1 mg in Soft drink, pepper type to 3 mg in Soft drink, pepper type, diet, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Soft drink, pepper type

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710545 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path