Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine
- Source serving
- 47 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 38 kcal
- Protein
- 2.6 g
Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition
Across all 10 named USDA examples, a cup contains 27–110 calories. Their listed weights span 135–245 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 123 g
47calories
Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709846 Full nutrition profile →
The 10 exact records in this guide report 14–55 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 18–49 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Match my meal
For Asparagus, begin by separating “Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine” from “Asparagus, raw.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Showing the first 6 of 10 linked records.
Equal-weight view
Five rank landmarks are shown from all 10 cited records: minimum, 25th-ranked, median-ranked, 75th-ranked, and maximum. Weight is held at 100 grams; source-serving weights are listed in the table.
Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories
What this page compares
This guide keeps 10 named USDA records in view: 10 direct matches. All sit within “Other vegetables and combinations.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 10 records together under the exact grouping key “asparagus.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.
For Asparagus, this page can compare 10 named records from FDC 2709846 through FDC 2709767. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →
Editor’s decision brief
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
The largest source amount is 1.8× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.
Composition
The lower endpoint is “frozen, cooked, no added fat”; the higher is “fresh, cooked with oil.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “raw” (2 mg) and “canned, cooked with butter or margarine” (296 mg).
Observed source examples
The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every asparagus.
14kcal
68 g source amount · 20 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record34kcal
93 g source amount · 37 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record55kcal
123 g source amount · 45 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower” begins with Asparagus, raw; “higher” ends with Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every asparagus meal.
Full comparison
For Asparagus, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine | Direct name match | 123 gUSDA reference amount | 47 kcal | 38 | 2.6 g | 2 g | 364 mg | FDC 2709846 ↗ |
| Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil | Direct name match | 123 gUSDA reference amount | 55 kcal | 45 | 2.6 g | 2 g | 343 mg | FDC 2709845 ↗ |
| Asparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat | Direct name match | 120 gUSDA reference amount | 23 kcal | 19 | 2.6 g | 1.9 g | 344 mg | FDC 2709836 ↗ |
| Asparagus, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine | Direct name match | 93 gUSDA reference amount | 39 kcal | 42 | 2.1 g | 2 g | 131 mg | FDC 2709842 ↗ |
| Asparagus, fresh, cooked with oil | Direct name match | 93 gUSDA reference amount | 46 kcal | 49 | 2.1 g | 2 g | 114 mg | FDC 2709841 ↗ |
| Asparagus, fresh, cooked, no added fat | Direct name match | 90 gUSDA reference amount | 19 kcal | 21 | 2.1 g | 2.1 g | 114 mg | FDC 2709834 ↗ |
| Asparagus, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine | Direct name match | 93 gUSDA reference amount | 34 kcal | 37 | 2.7 g | 1.4 g | 123 mg | FDC 2709844 ↗ |
| Asparagus, frozen, cooked with oil | Direct name match | 93 gUSDA reference amount | 41 kcal | 44 | 2.7 g | 1.4 g | 107 mg | FDC 2709843 ↗ |
| Asparagus, frozen, cooked, no added fat | Direct name match | 90 gUSDA reference amount | 16 kcal | 18 | 2.6 g | 1.4 g | 107 mg | FDC 2709835 ↗ |
| Asparagus, raw | Direct name match | 68 gUSDA reference amount | 14 kcal | 20 | 1.5 g | 1.4 g | 1 mg | FDC 2709767 ↗ |
Portion analysis
The listed source amounts run from 68 to 123 grams—a 55-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 14 calories for “raw” to 55 for “canned, cooked with oil.” At a fixed 100 grams, “frozen, cooked, no added fat” is 18 calories and “fresh, cooked with oil” is 49—a fixed-weight separation of 31 calories. For Asparagus, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “canned, cooked with butter or margarine”, “canned, cooked, no added fat”, “fresh, cooked, no added fat”, “frozen, cooked with oil”, and “raw”. The source formulations contain 6 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include salt, table, asparagus, raw, asparagus, canned, drained solids, and asparagus, frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. On this Asparagus page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
The family label “Asparagus” cannot resolve the differences between Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine and Asparagus, raw. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
The source amounts span 68–123 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.
Representative record-level distinctions include “canned, cooked with butter or margarine”, “canned, cooked, no added fat”, “fresh, cooked, no added fat”, “frozen, cooked with oil”, and “raw”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.
6 source-input codes appear across the selected records. Their presence and listed weights describe USDA formulations, not finished plated proportions.
Even “Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Asparagus unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.
Record matching
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that asparagus is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“canned, cooked with butter or margarine”, “fresh, cooked with butter or margarine”, “frozen, cooked with butter or margarine”, and “raw”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
Explore this meal family
Use a focused guide when its description matches your meal. Each one keeps its own exact source records and links back to this broader family.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 10 exact records behind Asparagus source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine reports 296 mg versus 2 mg for Asparagus, raw: a 294 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThe denominator changes the answer
Asparagus, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine reports 42 kcal per 100 g and 39 kcal in USDA source amount (93 g). Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine reports a lower 38 kcal per 100 g but a higher 47 kcal in USDA source amount (123 g).
Choose the record before reading the number
The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes Preparation wording (No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw) the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Asparagus source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Compare two records on this page Asparagus, fresh, cooked, no added fat vs Asparagus, rawBoth records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path 10 context records in this source topic Other vegetables and combinationsAsparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine and Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Salt, tableUSDA input 2047 appears in 6 of 10 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 0.3–0.3 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Asparagus, rawUSDA input 11011 appears in 4 of 10 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, sodium runs from 2 mg in Asparagus, raw to 296 mg in Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, iron runs from 0.5 mg in Asparagus, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine to 2.3 mg in Asparagus, fresh, cooked, no added fat, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path