Fajita, beef or pork
- Source serving
- 219 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 231 kcal
- Protein
- 11.5 g
Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition
Across all 3 named USDA examples, a cup contains 227–277 calories. Each included example lists 120 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 1 fajita · 95 g
219calories
Fajita, beef or pork
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2708605 Full nutrition profile →
The 3 exact records in this guide report 180–219 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 189–231 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Match my meal
For Fajita, begin by separating “Fajita, beef or pork” from “Fajita, shrimp.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Showing all 3 linked records.
Equal-weight view
All 3 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.
Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories
What this page compares
This guide keeps 3 named USDA records in view: 3 direct matches. All sit within “Other Mexican mixed dishes.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 3 records together under the exact grouping key “fajita.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.
For Fajita, this page can compare 3 named records from FDC 2708605 through FDC 2708606. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →
Editor’s decision brief
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
Equal source weights make the selected Fajita serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.
Composition
The lower endpoint is “shrimp”; the higher is “beef or pork.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “shrimp” (8.3 g) and “beef or pork” (12.1 g).
Observed source examples
These 3 records each use a 95 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every fajita; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.
180kcal
95 g source amount · 189 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record196kcal
95 g source amount · 206 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record219kcal
95 g source amount · 231 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower” begins with Fajita, shrimp; “higher” ends with Fajita, beef or pork, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every fajita meal.
Full comparison
For Fajita, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fajita, beef or pork | Direct name match | 95 gUSDA reference amount | 219 kcal | 231 | 11.5 g | 1.4 g | 436 mg | FDC 2708605 ↗ |
| Fajita, chicken | Direct name match | 95 gUSDA reference amount | 196 kcal | 206 | 10.7 g | 1.4 g | 428 mg | FDC 2708604 ↗ |
| Fajita, shrimp | Direct name match | 95 gUSDA reference amount | 180 kcal | 189 | 7.9 g | 1.4 g | 433 mg | FDC 2708606 ↗ |
Portion analysis
Every selected record uses a 95-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 180 calories for “shrimp” to 219 for “beef or pork.” At a fixed 100 grams, “shrimp” is 189 calories and “beef or pork” is 231—a fixed-weight separation of 42 calories. For Fajita, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “beef or pork”, “chicken”, and “shrimp”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes green pepper, cooked, as ingredient, onions, cooked, as ingredient, and red pepper, cooked, as ingredient; differentiating rows include beef, steak, flank, chicken, ns as to part, rotisserie, skin not eaten, and shrimp, grilled. On this Fajita page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
The family label “Fajita” cannot resolve the differences between Fajita, beef or pork and Fajita, shrimp. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
Every selected record uses 95 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.
Representative record-level distinctions include “beef or pork”, “chicken”, and “shrimp”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.
Shared source rows include green pepper, cooked, as ingredient and onions, cooked, as ingredient; rows that vary across the set include beef, steak, flank, chicken, ns as to part, rotisserie, skin not eaten, and shrimp, grilled. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.
Even “Fajita, beef or pork” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Fajita unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.
Record matching
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that fajita is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“beef or pork”, “chicken”, and “shrimp”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 3 exact records behind Fajita source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Fajita, beef or pork reports 2 mg versus 1.3 mg for Fajita, shrimp: a 0.7 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThese listed servings have equal weights
The 3 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 95 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.
Record identity is part of the estimate
These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Fajita source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
USDA input 24102070 appears in 1 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 30–30 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path 3 context records in this source topic Other Mexican mixed dishesFajita, beef or pork and Fajita, chicken belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path A shared source-formulation input Green pepper, cooked, as ingredientUSDA input 99997520 appears in 3 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 10–10 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Fajita, beef or porkOpen the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2708605 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.
Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Fajita, chickenOpen the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2708604 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, iron runs from 1.3 mg in Fajita, shrimp to 2 mg in Fajita, beef or pork, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Protein: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, protein runs from 8.3 g in Fajita, shrimp to 12.1 g in Fajita, beef or pork, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path