Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Mango calories per cup: 99–510 across all 3 named USDA examples

Across all 3 named USDA examples, a cup contains 99–510 calories. Their listed weights span 160–250 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 125 g

81calories

Mango, canned

Protein
0.8 g
Carbs
20.3 g
Fat
0.4 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709243 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 3 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 3 exact records in this guide report 50–128 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 60–319 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Mango, begin by separating “Mango, canned” from “Mango, raw.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 3 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How mango records compare at 100 grams

All 3 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Mango, raw 60 kcal
    60 kcal
  2. Mango, canned 65 kcal
    65 kcal
  3. Mango, dried 319 kcal
    319 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 3 named USDA records in view: 3 direct matches. They span 2 source categories, including Mango and papaya and Dried fruits. The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 3 records together under the exact grouping key “mango.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Mango, this page can compare 3 named records from FDC 2709243 through FDC 2709242. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

40–125 g before composition

The largest source amount is 3.1× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.

Composition

259 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “raw”; the higher is “dried.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

1.2 g fiber gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “canned” (1.2 g) and “dried” (2.4 g).

Observed source examples

Three landmarks inside this source set—not universal endpoints

The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every mango.

Important: “Lower” begins with Mango, raw; “higher” ends with Mango, dried, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every mango meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Mango, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Mango nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Mango, canned Direct name match 125 gUSDA reference amount 81 kcal 65 0.8 g 1.5 g 1 mg FDC 2709243 ↗
Mango, dried Direct name match 40 gUSDA reference amount 128 kcal 319 1 g 1 g 65 mg FDC 2709205 ↗
Mango, raw Direct name match 83 gUSDA reference amount 50 kcal 60 0.7 g 1.3 g 1 mg FDC 2709242 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

The listed source amounts run from 40 to 125 grams—a 85-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 50 calories for “raw” to 128 for “dried.” At a fixed 100 grams, “raw” is 60 calories and “dried” is 319—a fixed-weight separation of 259 calories. For Mango, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “canned”, “dried”, and “raw”. The source formulations contain 4 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include mangos, raw, beverages, water, tap, municipal, mango, dried, sweetened, and sugars, granulated. On this Mango page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Mango” cannot resolve the differences between Mango, canned and Mango, raw. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    Source weight before serving calories

    The source amounts span 40–125 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “canned”, “dried”, and “raw”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    4 source-input codes appear across the selected records. Their presence and listed weights describe USDA formulations, not finished plated proportions.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Mango, canned” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Mango unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that mango is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“canned”, “dried”, and “raw”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Mango source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 3 exact records behind Mango source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Mango, raw is higher in calcium per 100 g

Mango, raw reports 11 mg versus 0 mg for Mango, dried: a 11 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Mango, raw is denser; Mango, canned is higher in its source amount

Mango, raw reports 0.8 g per 100 g and 0.7 g in USDA source amount (83 g). Mango, canned reports a lower 0.6 g per 100 g but a higher 0.8 g in USDA source amount (125 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Mango, canned” from “Mango, raw”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Mango source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

A formulation detail that separates records Mangos, raw

USDA input 9176 appears in 2 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 75–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, water, tap, municipal

USDA input 14429 appears in 1 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 20–20 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 0 mg in Mango, dried to 11 mg in Mango, raw, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 1 mg in Mango, canned to 162 mg in Mango, dried, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path 1 context record in this source topic Dried fruits

Mango, dried belongs to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Mango, canned

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709243 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Mango, dried

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709205 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path