Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Soup, chicken calories per cup: 81–98 across all 3 named USDA examples

Across all 3 named USDA examples, a cup contains 81–98 calories. Each included example lists 245 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 cup · 245 g

98calories

Soup, chicken

Protein
8.4 g
Carbs
9.9 g
Fat
2.8 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2707134 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 3 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 3 exact records in this guide report 81–98 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 33–40 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Soup, chicken, begin by separating “Soup, chicken” from “Soup, chicken, canned, reduced sodium.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 3 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How soup, chicken records compare at 100 grams

All 3 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Soup, chicken, canned 33 kcal
    33 kcal
  2. Soup, chicken, canned, reduced sodium 34 kcal
    34 kcal
  3. Soup, chicken 40 kcal
    40 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 3 named USDA records in view: 3 direct matches. All sit within “Soups, broth-based.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first two description segments” placed these 3 records together under the exact grouping key “soup chicken.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Soup, chicken, this page can compare 3 named records from FDC 2707134 through FDC 2709150. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

A shared 245 g comparison anchor

Equal source weights make the selected Soup, chicken serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.

Composition

7 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “chicken, canned”; the higher is “chicken.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

1.4 g protein gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “chicken, canned” (2.0 g) and “chicken” (3.4 g).

Observed source examples

Three landmarks inside this source set—not universal endpoints

These 3 records each use a 245 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every soup, chicken; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.

Important: “Lower” begins with Soup, chicken, canned; “higher” ends with Soup, chicken, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every soup, chicken meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Soup, chicken, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Soup, chicken nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Soup, chicken Direct name match 245 gUSDA reference amount 98 kcal 40 8.4 g 2 g 610 mg FDC 2707134 ↗
Soup, chicken, canned Direct name match 245 gUSDA reference amount 81 kcal 33 4.9 g 2.2 g 652 mg FDC 2707133 ↗
Soup, chicken, canned, reduced sodium Direct name match 245 gUSDA reference amount 83 kcal 34 4.9 g 2.2 g 466 mg FDC 2709150 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

Every selected record uses a 245-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 81 calories for “chicken, canned” to 98 for “chicken.” At a fixed 100 grams, “chicken, canned” is 33 calories and “chicken” is 40—a fixed-weight separation of 7 calories. For Soup, chicken, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “chicken”, “chicken, canned”, and “chicken, canned, reduced sodium”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes beverages, water, tap, drinking, chicken as ingredient in recipes, and mirepoix, cooked, as ingredient; differentiating rows include potato, cooked, as ingredient, tomatoes, cooked, as ingredient, and vegetables as ingredient in soups. On this Soup, chicken page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Soup, chicken” cannot resolve the differences between Soup, chicken and Soup, chicken, canned, reduced sodium. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    A shared source weight

    Every selected record uses 245 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “chicken”, “chicken, canned”, and “chicken, canned, reduced sodium”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include beverages, water, tap, drinking and chicken as ingredient in recipes; rows that vary across the set include potato, cooked, as ingredient, tomatoes, cooked, as ingredient, and vegetables as ingredient in soups. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Soup, chicken” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Soup, chicken unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that soup, chicken is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“chicken”, “chicken, canned”, and “chicken, canned, reduced sodium”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Soup, chicken source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 3 exact records behind Soup, chicken source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Soup, chicken is higher in protein per 100 g

Soup, chicken reports 3.4 g versus 2 g for Soup, chicken, canned: a 1.4 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

3 listed servings each weigh 245 g

The 3 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 245 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Soup, chicken” from “Soup, chicken, canned, reduced sodium”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Soup, chicken source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

A formulation detail that separates records Potato, cooked, as ingredient

USDA input 99997100 appears in 2 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 30–30 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Tomatoes, cooked, as ingredient

USDA input 99997410 appears in 2 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 20–20 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path 3 context records in this source topic Soups, broth-based

Soup, chicken and Soup, chicken, canned belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Protein: density and serving context

In this page’s records, protein runs from 2 g in Soup, chicken, canned to 3.4 g in Soup, chicken, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Soup, chicken

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2707134 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Soup, chicken, canned

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2707133 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 190 mg in Soup, chicken, canned, reduced sodium to 266 mg in Soup, chicken, canned, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path