Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Stuffed tomato with rice calories per cup: 152–196 across all 2 named USDA examples

Across all 2 named USDA examples, a cup contains 152–196 calories. Each included example lists 198 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 99 g

98calories

Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat

Protein
4.7 g
Carbs
9.8 g
Fat
4.5 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709075 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 2 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 2 exact records in this guide report 76–98 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 77–99 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Stuffed tomato with rice, begin by separating “Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat” from “Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 2 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How stuffed tomato with rice records compare at 100 grams

All 2 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless 77 kcal
    77 kcal
  2. Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat 99 kcal
    99 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 2 named USDA records in view: 2 direct matches. All sit within “Vegetable dishes.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 2 records together under the exact grouping key “stuffed tomato.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Stuffed tomato with rice, this page can compare 2 named records from FDC 2709075 through FDC 2709076. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

A shared 99 g comparison anchor

Equal source weights make the selected Stuffed tomato with rice serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.

Composition

22 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “with rice; meatless”; the higher is “with rice and meat.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

3.2 g protein gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “with rice; meatless” (1.6 g) and “with rice and meat” (4.8 g).

Observed source examples

Both records, with their own serving weights intact

These 2 records each use a 99 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every stuffed tomato with rice; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.

Important: “Lower” begins with Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless; “higher” ends with Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every stuffed tomato with rice meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Stuffed tomato with rice, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Stuffed tomato with rice nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat Direct name match 99 gUSDA reference amount 98 kcal 99 4.7 g 1 g 181 mg FDC 2709075 ↗
Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless Direct name match 99 gUSDA reference amount 76 kcal 77 1.6 g 1.1 g 122 mg FDC 2709076 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

Every selected record uses a 99-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 76 calories for “with rice; meatless” to 98 for “with rice and meat.” At a fixed 100 grams, “with rice; meatless” is 77 calories and “with rice and meat” is 99—a fixed-weight separation of 22 calories. For Stuffed tomato with rice, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “with rice and meat” and “with rice, meatless”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes rice, white, long-grain, regular, enriched, cooked, salt, table, and spices, pepper, black; differentiating rows include beef, ground, green pepper, cooked, as ingredient, onions, cooked, as ingredient, and onions, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. On this Stuffed tomato with rice page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Stuffed tomato with rice” cannot resolve the differences between Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat and Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    A shared source weight

    Every selected record uses 99 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “with rice and meat” and “with rice, meatless”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include rice, white, long-grain, regular, enriched, cooked and salt, table; rows that vary across the set include beef, ground, green pepper, cooked, as ingredient, and onions, cooked, as ingredient. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Stuffed tomato with rice unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that stuffed tomato with rice is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“with rice and meat” and “with rice, meatless”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Stuffed tomato with rice source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Stuffed tomato with rice source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat is higher in protein per 100 g

Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat reports 4.8 g versus 1.6 g for Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless: a 3.2 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

2 listed servings each weigh 99 g

The 2 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 99 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat” from “Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Stuffed tomato with rice source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

A formulation detail that separates records Beef, ground

USDA input 21500100 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 30.8–30.8 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient

USDA input 99997520 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 17–17 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic Vegetable dishes

Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat and Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Protein: density and serving context

In this page’s records, protein runs from 1.6 g in Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless to 4.8 g in Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709075 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709076 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 123 mg in Stuffed tomato, with rice, meatless to 183 mg in Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path