Typical listed-weight range
19.3%–61.8%
The middle half of linked records spans 42.5 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Within Feast’s 3,850-record USDA FNDDS reference corpus, “Fat-free reduced-calorie creamy dressing” appears as a formulation input in 3 finished-food records. Their calories and nutrients describe those complete foods, not the input label by itself. Use the catalog to choose the closest finished food and open its exact FoodData Central citation.
Browse all 3 linked food records →This page helps you find complete foods that include Fat-free reduced-calorie creamy dressing in USDA’s nutrition data. Choose the record that most closely matches what you ate; Feast does not turn a collection average into a standalone ingredient estimate.
What the code means
Every occurrence collected here uses ingredient code 42157 and the source description “Creamy dressing, made with sour cream and/or buttermilk and oil, reduced calorie, fat-free.” The code is preserved exactly as it appears in the FNDDS input-food rows. It is not a FoodData Central FDC ID, so this page does not invent a standalone ingredient-record URL.
The strongest concentrations of linked records are currently Salad dressings and vegetable oils (2), Seafood mixed dishes (1). These are category counts within Feast’s selected 3,850-record corpus. They do not estimate how often the ingredient is eaten, how common it is in recipes generally, or its prevalence across every FNDDS release.
Collection-level interpretation
These summaries describe the linked FNDDS records in this exact corpus. They do not estimate consumer frequency, market share, or the composition of a meal. This is a very small set of 3 records: each observation can move the percentages, buckets, and interpolated quartiles substantially, so read the complete catalog rather than treating the summaries as stable population estimates.
Typical listed-weight range
The middle half of linked records spans 42.5 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Largest linked category
2 of 3 linked records (67%) sit in this USDA category. The remainder span 1 other category.
Most populated share band
2 records (67%) fall in this band after repeated rows for code 42157 are combined within each food.
Most frequent eligible co-input
It appears alongside code 42157 in 1 linked record (33%). Co-occurrence describes database structure, not a required recipe.
Where USDA uses this input
Each record is counted once even if ingredient code 42157 appears on more than one input row inside that formulation. The category grouping describes the complete linked foods, not a culinary rule about the ingredient.
Important nutrition boundary
No unique exact food-code match or reviewed sole-source bridge qualifies for a direct consumer answer. Feast therefore does not treat the collection median, minimum, maximum, or an arbitrary similar record as the nutrition of this input.
The table below describes the complete linked foods per 100 grams. Use it to find a closer finished-food record, not to infer what this formulation input supplies on its own.
Compare complete food records
Every value in this table describes an entire USDA survey-food record per 100 grams. The values are not the nutrient content of ingredient code 42157, and differences cannot be attributed to this one input.
| Whole-record nutrient | Observed minimum | Middle 50% | Median | Observed maximum | Linked records |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caloriesper 100 g of the complete food | 56 kcal | 67–93 kcal | 78 kcal | 107 kcal | 3 |
| Proteinper 100 g of the complete food | 1 g | 1.2–5.6 g | 1.4 g | 9.8 g | 3 |
| Carbohydrateper 100 g of the complete food | 7.4 g | 8.9–15.2 g | 10.4 g | 20 g | 3 |
| Total fatper 100 g of the complete food | 1.1 g | 1.2–1.9 g | 1.2 g | 2.7 g | 3 |
| Dietary fiberper 100 g of the complete food | 0 g | 0.2–0.5 g | 0.4 g | 0.5 g | 3 |
| Sodiumper 100 g of the complete food | 488 mg | 693–994 mg | 897 mg | 1,090 mg | 3 |
The minimum and maximum preserve the complete observed span. The median is the middle linked-record value, not a prediction for a meal and not an ingredient-specific nutrient estimate.
Complete linked catalog
This is the complete qualifying-corpus catalog, not a hand-picked sample. Search by food name or USDA category, then open a profile for household portions, Feast’s 21-nutrient panel, formulation details, and its exact FDC citation.
3 records shown
| Linked USDA food record | USDA category | Formulation | Listed input weight | Weight share | Calories | Protein | Sodium | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creamy Italian dressing, fat free | Salad dressings and vegetable oils | 2 input rows | 15 g | 15% | 56 kcal | 1 g | 1,090 mg | FDC 2710231 ↗ |
| Ranch dressing, fat free | Salad dressings and vegetable oils | Sole source | 100 g | 100% | 107 kcal | 1.4 g | 897 mg | FDC 2710236 ↗ |
| Tuna salad, made with light creamy dressing | Seafood mixed dishes | 5 input rows | 132 g | 23.6% | 78 kcal | 9.8 g | 488 mg | FDC 2706833 ↗ |
No linked record matches that filter. Clear the search to restore the complete catalog.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 3 exact records behind Creamy dressing, made with sour cream and/or buttermilk and oil, reduced calorie, fat-free (USDA input 42157). Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Tuna salad, made with light creamy dressing reports 9.8 g versus 1 g for Creamy Italian dressing, fat free: a 8.8 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThe denominator changes the answer
Ranch dressing, fat free reports 107 kcal per 100 g and 32 kcal in USDA source amount (30 g). Tuna salad, made with light creamy dressing reports a lower 78 kcal per 100 g but a higher 93 kcal in USDA source amount (119 g).
Record identity is part of the estimate
These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Creamy dressing, made with sour cream and/or buttermilk and oil, reduced calorie, fat-free (USDA input 42157), each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Creamy Italian dressing, fat free is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path Best next guide for this exact record Ranch dressingRanch dressing, fat free is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Ranch dressing, fat free vs Ranch dressing, lightRanch dressing, fat free is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Fat-level wording: nonfat or fat-free wording versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, drained solidsUSDA input 15121 appears in 1 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 276–276 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Pickle relish, sweetUSDA input 11945 appears in 1 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 30.6–30.6 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Creamy Italian dressing, fat free vs Creamy Italian dressing, lightCreamy Italian dressing, fat free is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Fat-level wording: nonfat or fat-free wording versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Protein: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, protein runs from 1 g in Creamy Italian dressing, fat free to 9.8 g in Tuna salad, made with light creamy dressing, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence pathMethod and provenance
Feast begins with its pinned 3,850-record USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods reference corpus for FNDDS 2021–2023. Each exact food profile retains its FDC identifier, source-food description, nutrient values, household measures, and positive-weight input-food rows. This page groups those input rows by the exact ingredient code 42157; it does not merge similar-looking ingredient names or infer synonyms.
The distinct-record count deduplicates by FDC food record. When the same code is listed more than once inside one source formulation, its input weights are added before the listed-weight share is calculated. Category counts also count each food once. The 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile use the sorted one-share-per-food values with linear interpolation between adjacent ranks when a percentile falls between two records.
USDA’s current FNDDS documentation explains that many nutrient profiles are generated with calculation recipes designed to represent multiple variants, and that their input codes are not necessarily the exact ingredients in a retail product or an ingredient declaration. It also documents moisture and nutrient-retention adjustments. Feast therefore treats these rows as transparent source-calculation evidence—not as a reverse-engineered recipe.
The complete-food nutrient table uses each linked record’s available published per-100-gram values so the denominator remains consistent; its middle-50% ranges use the same interpolated percentile method. It is presented for record selection and comparison only. No nutrient value is reassigned to the ingredient, no causal effect is inferred, and no “healthy” score is manufactured from the collection.
Use the ingredient as a discovery clue. Compare the linked record names, food categories, preparation wording, source formulation, and portion measures. If a close record exists, its complete profile can provide a defensible reference estimate. If the meal differs materially in cooking fat, sauce, ingredient ratios, or portion size, keep looking or use recipe weights, a package label, or an editable photo estimate instead.
These pages are educational source indexes. They do not provide medical advice, personalized nutrient targets, food-safety guidance, or a recipe. If a clinician has given you individualized dietary instructions, follow that guidance and use the most specific current source available for the food you actually consumed.