Other vegetables and combinations100 g vs 100 gTwo cited FDC recordsUpdated

Brussels sprouts, cooked: fresh cooked fat added vs frozen cooked no added USDA FDC 2709884 vs 2709882

Per 100 g, fresh cooked fat added reports 3 g total fat, while frozen cooked no added fat reports 0.4 g total fat.

The comparison uses two cited USDA records. Their complete source names, household portions, nutrient values, and FoodData Central links remain visible below.

Record A · FDC 2709884

Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Record B · FDC 2709882

Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Highlighted difference

Calories at the same 100-gram weight

Bar length shows the two cited values on one shared denominator. It does not rank either food or establish why they differ.

  1. 67 kcal
  2. 42 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kcal

Equal-weight evidence

Nutrition per 100 grams

Both columns use the same mass, which compares nutrient concentration without allowing the two representative source amounts to change the denominator. “A +” or “B +” reports the arithmetic difference between the cited values; it is not a quality score.

On smaller screens, focus a comparison table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Per-100-gram nutrient comparison for Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added and Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat
NutrientA · Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat addedB · Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added…Difference
CaloriesMaterial difference 67 kcal 42 kcal A +25 kcal
Protein 3.4 g 3.6 g B +0.2 g
Total fatMaterial difference 3 g 0.4 g A +2.6 g
Carbohydrate 9 g 8.3 g A +0.7 g
Dietary fiber 3.8 g 4.1 g B +0.3 g
Total sugars 2.2 g 2.1 g A +0.2 g
Sodium 151 mg 131 mg A +20 mg
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.1 g A +0.7 g
PotassiumMaterial difference 393 mg 289 mg A +104 mg
Calcium 43 mg 26 mg A +17 mg
Iron 1.4 mg 0.5 mg A +0.9 mg

Values come from the two cited USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods records. Feast does not average records, impute missing values, or infer a nutrient from the food name.

Read the table by question

Every material primary-nutrient difference on this page is numerically higher in A (2 of 2).

These answers describe concentration per 100 grams. “More” and “less” identify the arithmetic direction only; they do not decide which record is a better match or which food is better for a person.

Which reports fewer calories?

Record B

Record B reports 42 kcal, compared with 67 kcal in the other record—a difference of 25 kcal.

Which reports more protein?

Record B

Record B reports 3.6 g, compared with 3.4 g in the other record—a difference of 0.2 g.

Which reports more fiber?

Record B

Record B reports 4.1 g, compared with 3.8 g in the other record—a difference of 0.3 g.

Which reports less sodium?

Record B

Record B reports 131 mg, compared with 151 mg in the other record—a difference of 20 mg.

What differs in the source descriptions

The exact names carry information the numbers cannot.

USDA assigns both records to “Other vegetables and combinations,” but the topic label is broad. Record A is “Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added.” Record B is “Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat.” Feast paired them because their contrast-neutral food identities are an exact match, not merely because they share a generic category.

The controlled name parser found 2 interpretable distinctions. These labels organize wording already present in the names; they do not establish that a distinction caused a nutrient difference.

Controlled wording distinctions
Description dimensionRecord ARecord B
Added-fat wordingadded fatno added fat
Source formfreshfrozen

Even a clean name contrast can carry hidden companions. A fried record may also include coating; a restaurant record can use a different recipe; a reduced-sodium description can differ in more than salt; and a source amount can reflect a different reporting convention. That is why this page reports the complete pair rather than treating one word as an intervention.

Portion context

A representative source amount is not a shared “serving.”

Record A uses USDA reference amount at 80 g. Record B uses USDA reference amount at 78 g. Those labels and gram weights come from their respective records. They are useful for scaling the chosen profile, but they are not recommendations and need not describe equal amounts.

The representative amounts do not cross Feast’s material portion-difference threshold of both 15 grams and 20%. They are still separate source measures, so the 100-gram table remains the appropriate place for an equal-weight comparison.

A cup, piece, slice, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can have different gram weights across records. A matching label is not enough: check the listed grams. If accuracy matters more than convenience, weighing the food or using a current package label can be more specific than a generic survey-food measure.

One shared household label

1 cup: 160 g in A vs 155 g in B

The household label matches, but the source gram weights differ. These values scale each record by its own listed grams; they are practical portion context, not an equal-mass comparison.

Nutrition for one 1 cup using each record’s own source gram weight
NutrientA · 160 gB · 155 g
Calories107 kcal65 kcal
Protein5.5 g5.6 g
Dietary fiber6.1 g6.4 g
Sodium242 mg203 mg

USDA source formulation evidence

The listed inputs provide another way to audit the match.

FNDDS includes input-food rows behind each standardized survey-food record. Record A’s leading listed inputs include Brussels sprouts, raw, Oil or table fat, NFS, Salt, table. Record B’s include Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, Salt, table. Ingredient-code overlap is 25%, and normalized listed-input-weight variation is 100%.

Record A · 3 coded inputs

Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added

  1. Brussels sprouts, rawIngredient code 11098 · open source index
    96.8% of listed input weight
  2. Oil or table fat, NFSIngredient code 81200100 · open source index
    2.9% of listed input weight
  3. Salt, tableIngredient code 2047 · open source index
    0.3% of listed input weight

Record B · 2 coded inputs

Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat

  1. Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, without saltIngredient code 11101
    99.7% of listed input weight
  2. Salt, tableIngredient code 2047 · open source index
    0.3% of listed input weight

1 shared coded input

The largest shared entries include Salt, table. Shared codes can still carry different listed weights.

2 A-only and 1 B-only coded inputs

A-only entries include Brussels sprouts, raw, Oil or table fat, NFS. B-only entries include Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt.

Important: repeated rows carrying the same ingredient code are combined before the shares and overlap are calculated. These weights belong to USDA’s source formulation: they are not a reconstructed plate, final cooked yield, visitor serving, ingredient declaration, or estimate of what is visible in a photo. USDA’s FNDDS documentation explains that these calculation recipes can represent multiple variants, may include retention or moisture adjustments, and are not product-label ingredient lists.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Choosing the closer record

Match context first; scale second.

  1. 01

    Read both names literally

    Compare cooking method, coating, edible skin or peel, sauce, additions, venue, source form, and food subtype. For this pair, the full A and B descriptions above are the evidence—not shortened search labels.

  2. 02

    Use listed inputs as a check

    If the name still leaves ambiguity, compare the leading and unique source inputs. They can reveal that two near names refer to meaningfully different standardized formulations, but they do not reconstruct your dish.

  3. 03

    Choose an amount for that record

    After choosing A or B, use its own named measure and gram weight. Do not transfer a cup, slice, or “typical amount” from the other record as if the measures were interchangeable.

  4. 04

    Account for missing details

    Brand, current restaurant recipe, cooking oil, drained weight, toppings, substitutions, and unfinished portions may not be captured. A label or weighed recipe can supersede a generic reference when it better matches the actual food.

Limits and responsible interpretation

This is a comparison of records, not a causal study.

The two records come from 2021–2023 FoodData Central Survey Foods data. The nutrient table faithfully compares their published values on the same weight basis. It does not measure two plates prepared at the same time, isolate one ingredient, or estimate the uncertainty around either value.

For this pair, the source names differ across 2 documented description dimensions, while the listed formulations show 25% ingredient-code overlap and 100% normalized listed-weight variation. Moisture, ingredient proportions, preparation, and record construction can therefore move together. The page can describe the combined record difference; it cannot isolate the effect of one word.

A higher or lower number is not an overall verdict. Protein, fiber, sodium, energy, fat, micronutrients, preferences, allergies, budget, portion, and an individual’s goals answer different questions. Feast therefore reports directions and magnitudes without applying a universal “healthier” label.

This page is educational and does not diagnose a condition, prescribe a target, or replace advice from a qualified professional. For an allergy, medically directed diet, or strict ingredient limit, use verified ingredient information and guidance appropriate to that situation.

How this page qualified

A page is published only when the pair clears materiality and diversity gates.

Both records must occupy the same USDA survey-food topic and share a close food identity after a controlled vocabulary separates preparation, edible-part, source, claim, crust, and sauce wording. Exact contrast-neutral identities receive priority. Close ingredient or form substitutions can qualify when name overlap remains high and the numerical evidence is material.

For primary nutrients, Feast requires both an absolute and relative difference: at least 20 kcal and 12% for energy; 2 g and 18% for protein or fat; 5 g and 15% for carbohydrate; 1 g and 20% for fiber; 4 g and 20% for sugars; or 100 mg and 20% for sodium. A focused one-nutrient pair also needs a material representative-amount or formulation distinction. Rounding-only pairs are not published.

Unordered FDC IDs define a canonical pair, so reversing A and B cannot create another page. Each source record can appear twice at most, each USDA topic contributes no more than 40 pages, and closely repeated identity families are capped. Those rules produced a selective comparison library rather than every mathematical combination in the corpus.

Read the complete nutrition-page methodology for import, nutrient mapping, portion scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added versus Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added is higher in calories per 100 g

Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added reports 67 kcal versus 42 kcal for Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat: a 25 kcal difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Check the weight before comparing serving totals

Source amounts span 78–80 g

Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat uses USDA source amount (78 g), while Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added uses USDA source amount (80 g). Use per 100 g for equal-weight composition; use the serving column only when those named source amounts answer your question.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added” from “Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added versus Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Brussels sprouts

Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added and Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calories runs from 42 kcal in Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat to 67 kcal in Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added vs Brussels sprouts, raw

Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Brussels sprouts, raw

USDA input 11098 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Oil or table fat, NFS

USDA input 81200100 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 3–3 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
2 context records in this source topic Other vegetables and combinations

Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added and Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving context

In this page’s records, iron runs from 0.5 mg in Brussels sprouts, frozen, cooked, no added fat to 1.4 mg in Brussels sprouts, fresh, cooked, fat added, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path