Popcorn100 g vs 100 gTwo cited FDC recordsUpdated

Popcorn, ready-to-eat: cheese flavored vs plain USDA FDC 2708236 vs 2708232

Per 100 g, cheese flavored reports 889 mg sodium, while plain reports 616 mg sodium.

The comparison uses two cited USDA records. Their complete source names, household portions, nutrient values, and FoodData Central links remain visible below.

Record A · FDC 2708236

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Record B · FDC 2708232

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Highlighted difference

Total fat at the same 100-gram weight

Bar length shows the two cited values on one shared denominator. It does not rank either food or establish why they differ.

  1. 33.2 g
  2. 23.3 g

Shared basis: 100 g · g

Equal-weight evidence

Nutrition per 100 grams

Both columns use the same mass, which compares nutrient concentration without allowing the two representative source amounts to change the denominator. “A +” or “B +” reports the arithmetic difference between the cited values; it is not a quality score.

On smaller screens, focus a comparison table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Per-100-gram nutrient comparison for Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored and Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain
NutrientA · Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavoredB · Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plainDifference
Calories 526 kcal 482 kcal A +44 kcal
Protein 9.3 g 10.2 g B +0.9 g
Total fatMaterial difference 33.2 g 23.3 g A +9.9 g
CarbohydrateMaterial difference 51.6 g 61.2 g B +9.6 g
Dietary fiber 9.9 g 11.4 g B +1.5 g
Total sugars 0.8 g 0.7 g A +0.1 g
SodiumMaterial difference 889 mg 616 mg A +273 mg
Saturated fatMaterial difference 6.4 g 3.1 g A +3.3 g
Potassium 261 mg 259 mg A +2 mg
Calcium 113 mg 6 mg A +107 mg
Iron 2.2 mg 2.5 mg B +0.3 mg

Values come from the two cited USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods records. Feast does not average records, impute missing values, or infer a nutrient from the food name.

Read the table by question

The material primary-nutrient differences run in both directions: A is higher on 2, while B is higher on 1.

These answers describe concentration per 100 grams. “More” and “less” identify the arithmetic direction only; they do not decide which record is a better match or which food is better for a person.

Which reports fewer calories?

Record B

Record B reports 482 kcal, compared with 526 kcal in the other record—a difference of 44 kcal.

Which reports more protein?

Record B

Record B reports 10.2 g, compared with 9.3 g in the other record—a difference of 0.9 g.

Which reports more fiber?

Record B

Record B reports 11.4 g, compared with 9.9 g in the other record—a difference of 1.5 g.

Which reports less sodium?

Record B

Record B reports 616 mg, compared with 889 mg in the other record—a difference of 273 mg.

What differs in the source descriptions

The exact names carry information the numbers cannot.

USDA assigns both records to “Popcorn,” but the topic label is broad. Record A is “Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored.” Record B is “Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain.” Feast paired them because their contrast-neutral food identities are closely related (75% token overlap after controlled modifiers are set aside), not merely because they share a generic category.

No controlled preparation phrase is needed to explain this pairing. The close source names instead differ in narrow food or ingredient terms. Record A has the distinctive neutral terms cheese; Record B has the corresponding terms shown in its exact name. Read the full descriptions before selecting either profile.

Even a clean name contrast can carry hidden companions. A fried record may also include coating; a restaurant record can use a different recipe; a reduced-sodium description can differ in more than salt; and a source amount can reflect a different reporting convention. That is why this page reports the complete pair rather than treating one word as an intervention.

Portion context

A representative source amount is not a shared “serving.”

Record A uses USDA reference amount at 35 g. Record B uses USDA reference amount at 28 g. Those labels and gram weights come from their respective records. They are useful for scaling the chosen profile, but they are not recommendations and need not describe equal amounts.

The representative amounts do not cross Feast’s material portion-difference threshold of both 15 grams and 20%. They are still separate source measures, so the 100-gram table remains the appropriate place for an equal-weight comparison.

A cup, piece, slice, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can have different gram weights across records. A matching label is not enough: check the listed grams. If accuracy matters more than convenience, weighing the food or using a current package label can be more specific than a generic survey-food measure.

Record A measures

  • 1 cup14 g
  • 1 small single serving bag28 g
  • 1 medium single serving bag57 g
  • 1 large single serving bag85 g
  • 1 single serving bag, NFS57 g
  • 1 kernel0 g
  • USDA reference amount35 g
Scale record A →

Record B measures

  • 1 cup11 g
  • 1 small single serving bag28 g
  • 1 medium single serving bag57 g
  • 1 large single serving bag85 g
  • 1 single serving bag, NFS57 g
  • 1 kernel0 g
  • USDA reference amount28 g
Scale record B →

One shared household label

1 medium single serving bag: 57 g in A vs 57 g in B

Here the household label and listed gram weight match at displayed precision, so this particular table is also an equal-mass comparison. The values remain specific to these two source records, not a universal weight for every 1 medium single serving bag.

Nutrition for one 1 medium single serving bag using each record’s own source gram weight
NutrientA · 57 gB · 57 g
Calories300 kcal275 kcal
Protein5.3 g5.8 g
Dietary fiber5.6 g6.5 g
Sodium507 mg351 mg

USDA source formulation evidence

The listed inputs provide another way to audit the match.

FNDDS includes input-food rows behind each standardized survey-food record. Record A’s leading listed inputs include Snacks, popcorn, cheese-flavor. Record B’s include Snacks, popcorn, air-popped, Oil, corn, Salt, table. Ingredient-code overlap is 0%, and normalized listed-input-weight variation is 100%.

Record A · 1 coded input

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored

  1. Snacks, popcorn, cheese-flavorIngredient code 19040
    100% of listed input weight

Record B · 3 coded inputs

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain

  1. Snacks, popcorn, air-poppedIngredient code 19034 · open source index
    78.7% of listed input weight
  2. Oil, cornIngredient code 4518 · open source index
    19.7% of listed input weight
  3. Salt, tableIngredient code 2047 · open source index
    1.6% of listed input weight

0 shared coded inputs

The two listed formulations do not share an ingredient code in this source extract. Shared codes can still carry different listed weights.

1 A-only and 3 B-only coded inputs

A-only entries include Snacks, popcorn, cheese-flavor. B-only entries include Snacks, popcorn, air-popped, Oil, corn, Salt, table.

Important: repeated rows carrying the same ingredient code are combined before the shares and overlap are calculated. These weights belong to USDA’s source formulation: they are not a reconstructed plate, final cooked yield, visitor serving, ingredient declaration, or estimate of what is visible in a photo. USDA’s FNDDS documentation explains that these calculation recipes can represent multiple variants, may include retention or moisture adjustments, and are not product-label ingredient lists.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Choosing the closer record

Match context first; scale second.

  1. 01

    Read both names literally

    Compare cooking method, coating, edible skin or peel, sauce, additions, venue, source form, and food subtype. For this pair, the full A and B descriptions above are the evidence—not shortened search labels.

  2. 02

    Use listed inputs as a check

    If the name still leaves ambiguity, compare the leading and unique source inputs. They can reveal that two near names refer to meaningfully different standardized formulations, but they do not reconstruct your dish.

  3. 03

    Choose an amount for that record

    After choosing A or B, use its own named measure and gram weight. Do not transfer a cup, slice, or “typical amount” from the other record as if the measures were interchangeable.

  4. 04

    Account for missing details

    Brand, current restaurant recipe, cooking oil, drained weight, toppings, substitutions, and unfinished portions may not be captured. A label or weighed recipe can supersede a generic reference when it better matches the actual food.

Limits and responsible interpretation

This is a comparison of records, not a causal study.

The two records come from 2021–2023 FoodData Central Survey Foods data. The nutrient table faithfully compares their published values on the same weight basis. It does not measure two plates prepared at the same time, isolate one ingredient, or estimate the uncertainty around either value.

For this pair, the source names differ across narrow identity terms in the exact source names, while the listed formulations show 0% ingredient-code overlap and 100% normalized listed-weight variation. Moisture, ingredient proportions, preparation, and record construction can therefore move together. The page can describe the combined record difference; it cannot isolate the effect of one word.

A higher or lower number is not an overall verdict. Protein, fiber, sodium, energy, fat, micronutrients, preferences, allergies, budget, portion, and an individual’s goals answer different questions. Feast therefore reports directions and magnitudes without applying a universal “healthier” label.

This page is educational and does not diagnose a condition, prescribe a target, or replace advice from a qualified professional. For an allergy, medically directed diet, or strict ingredient limit, use verified ingredient information and guidance appropriate to that situation.

How this page qualified

A page is published only when the pair clears materiality and diversity gates.

Both records must occupy the same USDA survey-food topic and share a close food identity after a controlled vocabulary separates preparation, edible-part, source, claim, crust, and sauce wording. Exact contrast-neutral identities receive priority. Close ingredient or form substitutions can qualify when name overlap remains high and the numerical evidence is material.

For primary nutrients, Feast requires both an absolute and relative difference: at least 20 kcal and 12% for energy; 2 g and 18% for protein or fat; 5 g and 15% for carbohydrate; 1 g and 20% for fiber; 4 g and 20% for sugars; or 100 mg and 20% for sodium. A focused one-nutrient pair also needs a material representative-amount or formulation distinction. Rounding-only pairs are not published.

Unordered FDC IDs define a canonical pair, so reversing A and B cannot create another page. Each source record can appear twice at most, each USDA topic contributes no more than 40 pages, and closely repeated identity families are capped. Those rules produced a selective comparison library rather than every mathematical combination in the corpus.

Read the complete nutrition-page methodology for import, nutrient mapping, portion scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored versus Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored is higher in total fat per 100 g

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored reports 33.2 g versus 23.3 g for Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain: a 9.9 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain is denser; Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored is higher in its source amount

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain reports 10.2 g per 100 g and 2.9 g in USDA source amount (28 g). Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored reports a lower 9.3 g per 100 g but a higher 3.3 g in USDA source amount (35 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored” from “Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored versus Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Popcorn, ready-to-eat

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored and Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
2 exact records carried forward Popcorn

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored and Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Oil, corn

USDA input 4518 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 20–20 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Salt, table

USDA input 2047 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 1.6–1.6 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Popcorn, ready-to-eat, kettle vs Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Protein: 5.5 versus 10.2 g per 100 g; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 6 mg in Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain to 113 mg in Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
2 context records in this source topic Popcorn

Popcorn, ready-to-eat, cheese flavored and Popcorn, ready-to-eat, plain belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path