Calamari, cooked
- Source serving
- 132 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 155 kcal
- Protein
- 16.5 g
Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition
Across all 2 named USDA examples, a cup contains 209–316 calories. Each included example lists 135 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 85 g
132calories
Calamari, cooked
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706333 Full nutrition profile →
The 2 exact records in this guide report 132–199 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 155–234 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Match my meal
For Calamari, begin by separating “Calamari, cooked” from “Calamari, fried.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Showing all 2 linked records.
Equal-weight view
All 2 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.
Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories
What this page compares
This guide keeps 2 named USDA records in view: 2 direct matches. All sit within “Shellfish.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 2 records together under the exact grouping key “calamari.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.
For Calamari, this page can compare 2 named records from FDC 2706333 through FDC 2706334. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →
Editor’s decision brief
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
Equal source weights make the selected Calamari serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.
Composition
The lower endpoint is “cooked”; the higher is “fried.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “fried” (13.8 g) and “cooked” (19.4 g).
Observed source examples
These 2 records each use a 85 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every calamari; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.
132kcal
85 g source amount · 155 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record199kcal
85 g source amount · 234 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower” begins with Calamari, cooked; “higher” ends with Calamari, fried, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every calamari meal.
Full comparison
For Calamari, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calamari, cooked | Direct name match | 85 gUSDA reference amount | 132 kcal | 155 | 16.5 g | 0 g | 230 mg | FDC 2706333 ↗ |
| Calamari, fried | Direct name match | 85 gUSDA reference amount | 199 kcal | 234 | 11.7 g | 0.4 g | 320 mg | FDC 2706334 ↗ |
Portion analysis
Every selected record uses a 85-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 132 calories for “cooked” to 199 for “fried.” At a fixed 100 grams, “cooked” is 155 calories and “fried” is 234—a fixed-weight separation of 79 calories. For Calamari, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “cooked” and “fried”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes mollusks, squid, mixed species, raw and salt, table; differentiating rows include breading or batter as ingredient in food, oil or table fat, nfs, and vegetable oil, nfs. On this Calamari page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
The family label “Calamari” cannot resolve the differences between Calamari, cooked and Calamari, fried. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
Every selected record uses 85 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.
Representative record-level distinctions include “cooked” and “fried”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.
Shared source rows include mollusks, squid, mixed species, raw and salt, table; rows that vary across the set include breading or batter as ingredient in food, oil or table fat, nfs, and vegetable oil, nfs. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.
Even “Calamari, cooked” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Calamari unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.
Record matching
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that calamari is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“cooked” and “fried”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Calamari source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Calamari, fried reports 14.1 g versus 3.8 g for Calamari, cooked: a 10.3 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThese listed servings have equal weights
The 2 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 85 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.
Choose the record before reading the number
The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes Preparation wording (No matching controlled term in the source name versus fried) the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Calamari source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus fried; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Breading or batter as ingredient in foodUSDA input 99995000 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 25–25 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Oil or table fat, NFSUSDA input 81200100 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 4–4 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic ShellfishCalamari, cooked and Calamari, fried belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Dietary fiber: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, dietary fiber runs from 0 g in Calamari, cooked to 0.5 g in Calamari, fried, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Calamari, cookedOpen the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2706333 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, iron runs from 0.9 mg in Calamari, cooked to 1.4 mg in Calamari, fried, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path