Ice cream cone, soft serve, chocolate
- Source serving
- 245 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 196 kcal
- Protein
- 6.4 g
Focused USDA meal guide
The 4 exact records in this guide report 236–510 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 189–200 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Part of the Ice cream cone nutrition guide.
What this page compares
This page includes every selected Feast nutrition record whose normalized USDA description begins with “Ice cream cone, soft serve” under the documented two-segment variant rule. The records fall within Ice cream and frozen dairy desserts. Exact descriptions remain visible so this grouping does not erase preparation, ingredient, or source-serving differences.
How this guide was assembled: Feast deterministically grouped exact USDA FNDDS records by their source descriptions. Every nutrient number is computed from the linked source fields; this page does not use generated or invented nutrition estimates.
Every number on this page comes from the exact linked record. Values are descriptive observations from the selected records; they are not personalized estimates, recommended portions, or measurements of a meal in front of you.
Match my meal
Choose an exact FNDDS description to focus the record cards and comparison table. This narrows the source evidence; it does not infer your portion or ingredients.
Showing all 4 linked records.
Observed source examples
These cards order the selected records by calories in each record's own FNDDS source serving. They do not define the calorie range of every ice cream cone, soft serve and should not be used as a personalized estimate.
236kcal
125 g source amount · 189 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record245kcal
125 g source amount · 196 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record510kcal
255 g source amount · 200 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower,” “middle,” and “higher” refer only to order within the selected source set above. Different source-serving weights and, where labeled, contextual records mean these cards are examples—not endpoints of a meal estimate.
Full comparison
Serving values preserve each record's listed amount. Per-100-gram calories provide a shared weight basis. Dashes indicate that a value is not available, not that the nutrient is absent.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice cream cone, soft serve, chocolate | Direct name match | 125 gQuantity not specified | 245 kcal | 196 | 6.4 g | 1.1 g | 98 mg | FDC 2705651 ↗ |
| Ice cream cone, soft serve, chocolate, waffle cone | Direct name match | 255 gQuantity not specified | 510 kcal | 200 | 13.2 g | 2.3 g | 214 mg | FDC 2705653 ↗ |
| Ice cream cone, soft serve, vanilla | Direct name match | 125 gQuantity not specified | 236 kcal | 189 | 6.1 g | 0.5 g | 101 mg | FDC 2705650 ↗ |
| Ice cream cone, soft serve, vanilla, waffle cone | Direct name match | 255 gQuantity not specified | 492 kcal | 193 | 12.6 g | 1 g | 222 mg | FDC 2705652 ↗ |
Portion analysis
The listed source amounts span 125–255 grams, a 2.0× difference in mass before recipe or preparation is considered. Within the selected set, the source servings report 236–510 calories in the records' own listed source servings; the fixed-weight view reports 189–200 calories per 100 grams. A serving total and a per-100-gram value answer different questions, so neither should be substituted for the amount actually eaten.
To scale a record, divide the eaten grams by the record's source grams and multiply the listed serving values by that ratio. This assumes the eaten meal has the same composition as the matched record.
Preparation analysis
The record names distinguish chocolate and vanilla. USDA formulation rows also identify 4 distinct source-input codes across the set, including ice cream cones, cake or wafer-type, ice cream cones, sugar, rolled-type, ice creams, chocolate, light, and ice creams, vanilla, light. These details can help select a closer record, but they do not isolate the cause of a nutrient difference or reconstruct a recipe.
A precise-looking result is only as specific as the record match and the portion information supporting it.
What changes the comparison
The visible dish name is a starting point. These details usually explain more of the variation in the selected source records.
The exact records list 125–255 grams, so serving totals can move even before composition is compared.
The set explicitly distinguishes chocolate and vanilla; those words identify different records rather than optional SEO phrasing.
Across each record's own source serving, the displayed data span protein 6.1–13.2 g, fiber 0.5–2.3 g, sodium 98–222 mg. Different serving weights remain visible beside those values.
The source rows include 4 distinct input codes across this set. Input presence and weight describe standardized source formulations, not final plated proportions.
Record matching
Begin with the full source description rather than the shortest dish name. Check whether the named form—such as chocolate and vanilla—matches the meal, then compare the listed source weight with the portion actually eaten. If the brand, recipe, toppings, cooking fat, or portion is known, keep that information with the estimate instead of assuming the generic record already includes it.