Potato tots, fast food / restaurant
- Source serving
- 153 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 236 kcal
- Protein
- 1.2 g
USDA record comparison
The 5 exact records in this guide report 108–154 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 166–237 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
What this page compares
This page includes every selected Feast nutrition record whose normalized USDA description begins with “Potato tots” under the documented one-segment family rule. The records fall within French fries and other fried white potatoes. Exact descriptions remain visible so this grouping does not erase preparation, ingredient, or source-serving differences.
How this guide was assembled: Feast deterministically grouped exact USDA FNDDS records by their source descriptions. Every nutrient number is computed from the linked source fields; this page does not use generated or invented nutrition estimates.
Every number on this page comes from the exact linked record. Values are descriptive observations from the selected records; they are not personalized estimates, recommended portions, or measurements of a meal in front of you.
Match my meal
Choose an exact FNDDS description to focus the record cards and comparison table. This narrows the source evidence; it does not infer your portion or ingredients.
Showing all 5 linked records.
Observed source examples
These cards order the selected records by calories in each record's own FNDDS source serving. They do not define the calorie range of every potato tots and should not be used as a personalized estimate.
108kcal
65 g source amount · 166 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record153kcal
65 g source amount · 236 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record154kcal
65 g source amount · 237 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower,” “middle,” and “higher” refer only to order within the selected source set above. Different source-serving weights and, where labeled, contextual records mean these cards are examples—not endpoints of a meal estimate.
Full comparison
Serving values preserve each record's listed amount. Per-100-gram calories provide a shared weight basis. Dashes indicate that a value is not available, not that the nutrient is absent.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potato tots, fast food / restaurant | Direct name match | 65 gQuantity not specified | 153 kcal | 236 | 1.2 g | 1.5 g | 371 mg | FDC 2709512 ↗ |
| Potato tots, from fresh, fried or baked | Direct name match | 65 gQuantity not specified | 154 kcal | 237 | 1.2 g | 1.5 g | 274 mg | FDC 2709514 ↗ |
| Potato tots, frozen, baked | Direct name match | 65 gQuantity not specified | 122 kcal | 187 | 1.3 g | 1.6 g | 293 mg | FDC 2709515 ↗ |
| Potato tots, frozen, fried | Direct name match | 65 gQuantity not specified | 154 kcal | 237 | 1.2 g | 1.5 g | 274 mg | FDC 2709516 ↗ |
| Potato tots, school | Direct name match | 65 gQuantity not specified | 108 kcal | 166 | 1.3 g | 1.1 g | 96 mg | FDC 2709513 ↗ |
Portion analysis
Every record uses a 65-gram source amount, which removes serving-weight differences inside this set but does not establish the size of your portion. Within the selected set, the source servings report 108–154 calories in the records' own listed source servings; the fixed-weight view reports 166–237 calories per 100 grams. A serving total and a per-100-gram value answer different questions, so neither should be substituted for the amount actually eaten.
To scale a record, divide the eaten grams by the record's source grams and multiply the listed serving values by that ratio. This assumes the eaten meal has the same composition as the matched record.
Preparation analysis
The record names distinguish frozen, fast food / restaurant, from fresh, and school. USDA formulation rows also identify 6 distinct source-input codes across the set, including potato puffs, frozen, unprepared, vegetable oil, nfs, salt, table, and industrial oil as ingredient in food. These details can help select a closer record, but they do not isolate the cause of a nutrient difference or reconstruct a recipe.
A precise-looking result is only as specific as the record match and the portion information supporting it.
What changes the comparison
The visible dish name is a starting point. These details usually explain more of the variation in the selected source records.
The exact records list 65–65 grams, so serving totals can move even before composition is compared.
The set explicitly distinguishes frozen, fast food / restaurant, from fresh, and school; those words identify different records rather than optional SEO phrasing.
Across each record's own source serving, the displayed data span protein 1.2–1.3 g, fiber 1.1–1.6 g, sodium 96–371 mg. Different serving weights remain visible beside those values.
The source rows include 6 distinct input codes across this set. Input presence and weight describe standardized source formulations, not final plated proportions.
Record matching
Begin with the full source description rather than the shortest dish name. Check whether the named form—such as frozen, fast food / restaurant, from fresh, and school—matches the meal, then compare the listed source weight with the portion actually eaten. If the brand, recipe, toppings, cooking fat, or portion is known, keep that information with the estimate instead of assuming the generic record already includes it.