Tea, bubble
- Source serving
- 239 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 55 kcal
- Protein
- 1.7 g
Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition
Across 31 of 42 named USDA examples, a fl oz (no ice) contains 0–14 calories. Their listed weights span 30–31 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g. The remaining 11 specifically named examples do not list that exact household measure.
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 1 item, any size · 435 g
239calories
Tea, bubble
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710508 Full nutrition profile →
The 42 exact records in this guide report 0–239 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 0–55 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Match my meal
For Tea, begin by separating “Tea, bubble” from “Tea, kombucha.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Showing the first 6 of 42 linked records.
Equal-weight view
Five rank landmarks are shown from all 42 cited records: minimum, 25th-ranked, median-ranked, 75th-ranked, and maximum. Weight is held at 100 grams; source-serving weights are listed in the table.
Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories
What this page compares
This guide keeps 42 named USDA records in view: 42 direct matches. All sit within “Tea.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 42 records together under the exact grouping key “tea.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.
For Tea, this page can compare 42 named records from FDC 2710508 through FDC 2710509. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →
Editor’s decision brief
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
The largest source amount is 1.2× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.
Composition
The lower endpoint is “hibiscus”; the higher is “bubble.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “chamomile” (0.0 g) and “with milk” (1.6 g).
Observed source examples
The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every tea.
0kcal
360 g source amount · 0 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record4kcal
360 g source amount · 1 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record239kcal
435 g source amount · 55 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower” begins with Tea, hot, hibiscus; “higher” ends with Tea, bubble, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every tea meal.
Full comparison
For Tea, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tea, bubble | Direct name match | 435 gUSDA reference amount | 239 kcal | 55 | 1.7 g | 0.4 g | 39 mg | FDC 2710508 ↗ |
| Tea, ginger | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0.1 g | 0 g | 14 mg | FDC 2710507 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, chamomile | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 4 mg | FDC 2710505 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, herbal | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 4 mg | FDC 2710502 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, hibiscus | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 0 kcal | 0 | 0 g | 0 g | 14 mg | FDC 2710503 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, leaf, black | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710488 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, leaf, black, decaffeinated | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710489 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, leaf, green | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0.8 g | 0 g | 4 mg | FDC 2710490 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, leaf, green, decaffeinated | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 0 kcal | 0 | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg | FDC 2710491 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, leaf, oolong | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710492 ↗ |
| Tea, hot, with milk | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 184 kcal | 51 | 5.7 g | 0.4 g | 72 mg | FDC 2710506 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, black | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 162 kcal | 45 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710527 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, black, decaffeinated | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 137 kcal | 38 | 0 g | 0 g | 29 mg | FDC 2710528 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, black, decaffeinated, diet | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 0 kcal | 0 | 0 g | 0 g | 14 mg | FDC 2710530 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, black, decaffeinated, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710532 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, black, diet | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 61 mg | FDC 2710529 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, black, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 0 kcal | 0 | 0 g | 0 g | 7 mg | FDC 2710531 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, green | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 97 kcal | 27 | 0 g | 0 g | 76 mg | FDC 2710533 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, green, diet | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 14 kcal | 4 | 0 g | 0 g | 22 mg | FDC 2710534 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, bottled, green, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 0 kcal | 0 | 0 g | 0 g | 25 mg | FDC 2710535 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, black, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with low calorie sweetener | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 7 kcal | 2 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710519 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, black, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with sugar | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 119 kcal | 32 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710518 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, black, decaffeinated, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710520 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, black, pre-sweetened with low calorie sweetener | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 7 kcal | 2 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710516 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, black, pre-sweetened with sugar | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 119 kcal | 32 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710515 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, black, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 11 mg | FDC 2710517 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, green, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with low calorie sweetener | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg | FDC 2710525 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, green, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with sugar | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 115 kcal | 31 | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg | FDC 2710524 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, green, decaffeinated, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 0 kcal | 0 | 0 g | 0 g | 0 mg | FDC 2710526 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, green, pre-sweetened with low calorie sweetener | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 7 kcal | 2 | 0.8 g | 0 g | 4 mg | FDC 2710522 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, green, pre-sweetened with sugar | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 119 kcal | 32 | 0.7 g | 0 g | 4 mg | FDC 2710521 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, brewed, green, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0.8 g | 0 g | 4 mg | FDC 2710523 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, black, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with low calorie sweetener | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 11 kcal | 3 | 0.1 g | 0 g | 25 mg | FDC 2710497 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, black, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with sugar | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 119 kcal | 32 | 0.2 g | 0 g | 15 mg | FDC 2710495 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, black, decaffeinated, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0.2 g | 0 g | 14 mg | FDC 2710498 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, black, pre-sweetened with low calorie sweetener | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 7 kcal | 2 | 0.1 g | 0 g | 22 mg | FDC 2710496 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, black, pre-sweetened with sugar | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 112 kcal | 30 | 0 g | 0.4 g | 15 mg | FDC 2710494 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, black, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 4 kcal | 1 | 0.1 g | 0 g | 14 mg | FDC 2710493 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, green, pre-sweetened with low calorie sweetener | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 14 kcal | 4 | 0 g | 0 g | 22 mg | FDC 2710501 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, green, pre-sweetened with sugar | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 100 kcal | 27 | 0 g | 0 g | 78 mg | FDC 2710500 ↗ |
| Tea, iced, instant, green, unsweetened | Direct name match | 360 gUSDA reference amount | 0 kcal | 0 | 0 g | 0 g | 25 mg | FDC 2710499 ↗ |
| Tea, kombucha | Direct name match | 372 gUSDA reference amount | 60 kcal | 16 | 0.4 g | 0 g | 7 mg | FDC 2710509 ↗ |
Portion analysis
The listed source amounts run from 360 to 435 grams—a 75-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 0 calories for “hibiscus” to 239 for “bubble.” At a fixed 100 grams, “hibiscus” is 0 calories and “bubble” is 55—a fixed-weight separation of 55 calories. For Tea, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “bubble”, “hot, with milk”, “iced, brewed, black, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with sugar”, “iced, brewed, green, unsweetened”, and “kombucha”. The source formulations contain 31 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include sugars, granulated, beverages, water, tap, drinking, beverages, tea, black, brewed, prepared with tap water, and beverages, tea, black, brewed, prepared with tap water, decaffeinated. On this Tea page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
The family label “Tea” cannot resolve the differences between Tea, bubble and Tea, kombucha. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
The source amounts span 360–435 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.
Representative record-level distinctions include “bubble”, “hot, with milk”, “iced, brewed, black, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with sugar”, “iced, brewed, green, unsweetened”, and “kombucha”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.
31 source-input codes appear across the selected records. Their presence and listed weights describe USDA formulations, not finished plated proportions.
Even “Tea, bubble” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Tea unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.
Record matching
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that tea is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“bubble”, “iced, bottled, black, decaffeinated, unsweetened”, “iced, brewed, green, decaffeinated, pre-sweetened with sugar”, and “kombucha”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
Explore this meal family
Use a focused guide when its description matches your meal. Each one keeps its own exact source records and links back to this broader family.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 42 exact records behind Tea source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Tea, bubble reports 55 kcal versus 0 kcal for Tea, hot, hibiscus: a 55 kcal difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceCheck the weight before comparing serving totals
Tea, ginger uses USDA source amount (360 g), while Tea, bubble uses USDA source amount (435 g). Use per 100 g for equal-weight composition; use the serving column only when those named source amounts answer your question.
Choose the record before reading the number
The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes Sugar wording (No matching controlled term in the source name versus diet wording) the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Tea source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Sugar wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus diet wording; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Compare two records on this page Tea, iced, bottled, black, decaffeinated vs Tea, iced, bottled, black, unsweetenedBoth records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Sugar wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus unsweetened; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path 42 context records in this source topic TeaTea, bubble and Tea, ginger belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, tea, black, brewed, prepared with tap waterUSDA input 14355 appears in 5 of 42 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–480 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, tea, black, brewed, prepared with tap water, decaffeinatedUSDA input 14352 appears in 5 of 42 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–240 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, calories runs from 0 kcal in Tea, hot, hibiscus to 55 kcal in Tea, bubble, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Potassium: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, potassium runs from 0 mg in Tea, iced, bottled, black, unsweetened to 91 mg in Tea, hot, with milk, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path