Sauces, fats & condimentsmoderate variability

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free calories: 38 per 33 g

This exact USDA record reports 38 calories for 33 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 33 g

Calories
38 kcal
Protein
0.5 g
Carbohydrate
8.4 g
Total fat
0.3 g
Fiber
0.6 g
Sodium
269 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 33 g

38calories

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free

Protein
0.5 g
Carbs
8.4 g
Fat
0.3 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710229

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 38 calories for USDA reference amount at 33 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 115 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 0.5 g protein, 0.6 g fiber, and 269 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free, representing 100% of the record’s listed input weight. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 tablespoon answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 19–305 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2710229: “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2710229, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 tablespoon” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 tablespoonUSDA-listed household measure 16.6 g 19 kcal 0.3 g 0.3 g 135 mg
1 packetUSDA-listed household measure 44 g 51 kcal 0.7 g 0.8 g 358 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 265 g 305 kcal 4 g 4.8 g 2,157 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Salad dressings and vegetable oils

The comparison set contains 47 exact records in the Salad dressings and vegetable oils USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2710229’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

lower quarter

115 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
379 kcal
Middle 50%
165–884 kcal

Based on 47 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

1.5 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.7 g
Middle 50%
0–1.3 g

Based on 47 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

upper quarter

1.8 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.1 g
Middle 50%
0–0.7 g

Based on 47 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

814 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
833 mg
Middle 50%
0–959 mg

Based on 47 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2710229’s 33 g reference weight, none of the compatible strength-side nutrients evaluated here reaches 5% Daily Value; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

No compatible strength-side nutrient evaluated here reaches 5% DV at this reference weight, so this page does not manufacture a “strength” from a negligible percentage.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium269 mg

≈ 12% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat0.1 g

≈ 1% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2710216 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 tablespoon to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 16.6 g and 265 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 19 kcal to 305 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2710216

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 25.1 g less total fat than “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Single listed source: Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free

    USDA derives this record from one listed source-input row at 100 g. Real preparations can still differ in water, cooking state, brand, and served weight.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “fat free” fits. Inspect FDC 2710216 when “light” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free

Exact source wording
“Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2710229 · FNDDS 83300100
Named qualifiers
fat free

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light

Exact source wording
“Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2710216 · FNDDS 83201000
Named qualifiers
light
Source inputs unique in this pair
Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “fat free”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordBlue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free 33 g38 kcal 115 kcal 1.5 g 1 g 1.8 g 814 mg
Blue or roquefort cheese dressing 31 g150 kcal 484 kcal 1.4 g 51.1 g 0.4 g 642 mg
Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light 31 g93 kcal 300 kcal 1.4 g 26.1 g 1.1 g 728 mg
Ranch dressing, fat free 30 g32 kcal 107 kcal 1.4 g 2.7 g 0 g 897 mg
Caesar dressing, fat free 28 g37 kcal 131 kcal 1.5 g 0.2 g 0.2 g 1,260 mg
Italian dressing, fat free 28 g13 kcal 47 kcal 1 g 0.9 g 0.6 g 1,130 mg
French or Catalina dressing, fat free 32 g42 kcal 132 kcal 0.2 g 0.3 g 2.2 g 853 mg

How to compare FDC 2710229: its source amount is 33 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2710229, the 4 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

305 kcal

265 g

1 tablespoon

19 kcal

17 g

1 packet

51 kcal

44 g

1 dipping-size container

66 kcal

57 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2710229, Sodium is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Sodium

268.6 mg≈ 12% Daily Value

Carbohydrate

8.4 g≈ 3% Daily Value

Dietary fiber

0.6 g≈ 2% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2710229’s 33 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2710229 at 33 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 269 mg sodium, about 12% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 33 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 38 kcal Not established
Protein 0.5 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 8.4 g 3%
Total fat 0.3 g 0%
Dietary fiber 0.6 g 2%
Sugars 2.5 g Not established
Sodium 268.6 mg 12%
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1%
Monounsaturated Fat 0.1 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0 g Not established
Cholesterol 0.7 mg 0%
Potassium 64 mg 1%
Calcium 16.8 mg 1%
Iron 0 mg 0%
Magnesium 5 mg 1%
Vitamin C 0.2 mg 0%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 1.7 µg 0%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 22.4 g Not established

For FDC 2710229, approximate percentages divide the displayed 33 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2710229 to one source input totaling 100 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

A single-source formulation

Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free is the only listed source input for this record. That does not mean every real-world version is identical; brands, preparation, water content, and portion weight can still differ.

100 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-freeUSDA ingredient 42192 100 GM 100 g 100%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2710229, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Salad dressings and vegetable oils” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories115 kcal300 kcal−185 kcal
Protein1.5 g1.4 g+0.1 g
Carbohydrate25.6 g15.2 g+10.4 g
Total fat1 g26.1 g−25.1 g
Dietary fiber1.8 g1.1 g+0.7 g
Sodium814 mg728 mg+86 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 185 less calories, 10.4 g more carbohydrate, and 25.1 g less total fat than “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light.”

Only the comparison record lists Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free.

Listed only in the comparison: Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 33 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 tablespoon (17 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 31 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 tablespoon (15 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2710229 with FDC 2710216 at equal mass; use their 33 g and 31 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2710229 versus FDC 2710216 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full salad dressings and vegetable oils source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2710229 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount used, recipe or brand, concentration, oil, sugar, and salt formulation.

For “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free,” resolve amount used first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount used

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe or brand

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    concentration

    Estimate what was actually consumed, including liquid left behind. The same bowl volume can contain a different mass and solid-to-liquid balance.

  4. 04

    oil, sugar, and salt formulation

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2710229 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 115 kcal per 100 g becomes 38 kcal at 33 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2710229

FNDDS food code: 83300100

The scaling for FDC 2710229 can be exact while the match to “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 33 g weight, 1-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.