Sauces, fats & condimentsmoderate variability

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light calories: 93 per 31 g

This exact USDA record reports 93 calories for 31 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 31 g

Calories
93 kcal
Protein
0.4 g
Carbohydrate
4.7 g
Total fat
8.1 g
Fiber
0.3 g
Sodium
226 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 31 g

93calories

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light

Protein
0.4 g
Carbs
4.7 g
Fat
8.1 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710216

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 93 calories for USDA reference amount at 31 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 300 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 0.4 g protein, 0.3 g fiber, and 226 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular, representing 50% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 2 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 tablespoon answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 46–735 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2710216: “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2710216, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 tablespoon” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 tablespoonUSDA-listed household measure 15.3 g 46 kcal 0.2 g 0.2 g 111 mg
1 packetUSDA-listed household measure 44 g 132 kcal 0.6 g 0.5 g 320 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 245 g 735 kcal 3.5 g 2.7 g 1,784 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Salad dressings and vegetable oils

The comparison set contains 47 exact records in the Salad dressings and vegetable oils USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2710216’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

300 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
379 kcal
Middle 50%
165–884 kcal

Based on 47 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

1.4 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.7 g
Middle 50%
0–1.3 g

Based on 47 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

upper quarter

1.1 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.1 g
Middle 50%
0–0.7 g

Based on 47 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

728 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
833 mg
Middle 50%
0–959 mg

Based on 47 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2710216’s 31 g reference weight, none of the compatible strength-side nutrients evaluated here reaches 5% Daily Value; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

No compatible strength-side nutrient evaluated here reaches 5% DV at this reference weight, so this page does not manufacture a “strength” from a negligible percentage.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium226 mg

≈ 10% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat1.4 g

≈ 7% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2710197 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 tablespoon to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 15.3 g and 245 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 46 kcal to 735 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2710197

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 10.4 g more carbohydrate than “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular

    The source formulation has 2 input rows; Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular supplies 50% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “light” fits. Inspect FDC 2710197 when the exact wording “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light

Exact source wording
“Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2710216 · FNDDS 83201000
Named qualifiers
light
Source inputs unique in this pair
Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Blue or roquefort cheese dressing

Exact source wording
“Blue or roquefort cheese dressing”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2710197 · FNDDS 83101000

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “light”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordBlue or roquefort cheese dressing, light 31 g93 kcal 300 kcal 1.4 g 26.1 g 1.1 g 728 mg
Blue or roquefort cheese dressing 31 g150 kcal 484 kcal 1.4 g 51.1 g 0.4 g 642 mg
Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat free 33 g38 kcal 115 kcal 1.5 g 1 g 1.8 g 814 mg
Ranch dressing, light 30 g48 kcal 160 kcal 1.5 g 14 g 0 g 833 mg
Caesar dressing, light 30 g33 kcal 110 kcal 0.3 g 4.4 g 0.1 g 1,150 mg
Italian dressing, light 28 g29 kcal 102 kcal 0.4 g 6.7 g 0 g 891 mg
Sesame dressing, light 29 g30 kcal 102 kcal 0.4 g 6.7 g 0 g 891 mg

How to compare FDC 2710216: its source amount is 31 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2710216, the 4 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

735 kcal

245 g

1 tablespoon

46 kcal

15 g

1 packet

132 kcal

44 g

1 dipping-size container

171 kcal

57 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2710216, Total fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Total fat

8.1 g≈ 10% Daily Value

Sodium

225.7 mg≈ 10% Daily Value

Saturated fat

1.4 g≈ 7% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2710216’s 31 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 31 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 93 kcal Not established
Protein 0.4 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 4.7 g 2%
Total fat 8.1 g 10%
Dietary fiber 0.3 g 1%
Sugars 1.7 g Not established
Sodium 225.7 mg 10%
Saturated fat 1.4 g 7%
Monounsaturated Fat 2.1 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 4.3 g Not established
Cholesterol 5 mg 2%
Potassium 43.7 mg 1%
Calcium 13.6 mg 1%
Iron 0 mg 0%
Magnesium 3.7 mg 1%
Vitamin C 0.2 mg 0%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 3.1 µg 0%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 16.7 g Not established

For FDC 2710216, approximate percentages divide the displayed 31 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2710216 to 2 source inputs totaling 100 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

2 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular, Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regularUSDA ingredient 4539 50 GM 50 g 50%
2 Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-freeUSDA ingredient 42192 50 GM 50 g 50%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2710216, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Salad dressings and vegetable oils” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories300 kcal484 kcal−184 kcal
Protein1.4 g1.4 g+0.1 g
Carbohydrate15.2 g4.8 g+10.4 g
Total fat26.1 g51.1 g−25 g
Dietary fiber1.1 g0.4 g+0.7 g
Sodium728 mg642 mg+86 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 184 less calories, 10.4 g more carbohydrate, and 25 g less total fat than “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing.”

Only this record lists Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular.

Listed only in this record: Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, fat-free.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 31 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 tablespoon (15 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 31 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 tablespoon (15 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2710216 with FDC 2710197 at equal mass; use their 31 g and 31 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2710216 versus FDC 2710197 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full salad dressings and vegetable oils source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2710216 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount used, recipe or brand, concentration, oil, sugar, and salt formulation.

For “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light,” resolve amount used first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount used

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe or brand

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    concentration

    Estimate what was actually consumed, including liquid left behind. The same bowl volume can contain a different mass and solid-to-liquid balance.

  4. 04

    oil, sugar, and salt formulation

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2710216 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 300 kcal per 100 g becomes 93 kcal at 31 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2710216

FNDDS food code: 83201000

The scaling for FDC 2710216 can be exact while the match to “Blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 31 g weight, 2-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.