Meat & poultrymoderate variability

Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, fast food calories: 271 per 100 g

This exact USDA record reports 271 calories for 100 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Exact USDA description: Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 100 g

Calories
271 kcal
Protein
19.2 g
Carbohydrate
17.2 g
Total fat
14 g
Fiber
1.2 g
Sodium
769 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 100 g

271calories

Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food

Protein
19.2 g
Carbs
17.2 g
Fat
14 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706099

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 271 calories for USDA reference amount at 100 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 271 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 19.2 g protein, 1.2 g fiber, and 769 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is fast foods, chicken tenders, representing 100% of the record’s listed input weight. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 27–379 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706099: “Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706099, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 popcorn chicken” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 popcorn chickenUSDA-listed household measure 10 g 27 kcal 1.9 g 0.1 g 77 mg
1 chicken fryUSDA-listed household measure 14 g 38 kcal 2.7 g 0.2 g 108 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 140 g 379 kcal 26.9 g 1.7 g 1,077 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Chicken patties, nuggets and tenders

The comparison set contains 13 exact records in the Chicken patties, nuggets and tenders USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2706099’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

271 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
271 kcal
Middle 50%
262–298 kcal

Based on 13 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

19.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
15.7 g
Middle 50%
14.8–17.8 g

Based on 13 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

1.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.2 g
Middle 50%
0.9–1.7 g

Based on 13 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

upper quarter

769 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
594 mg
Middle 50%
527–600 mg

Based on 13 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706099’s 100 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Potassium; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Potassium373 mg

≈ 8% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Magnesium28 mg

≈ 7% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium769 mg

≈ 33% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat2.5 g

≈ 12% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706100 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 popcorn chicken to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 10 g and 140 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 27 kcal to 379 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706100

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1.6 g less total fat than “Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from restaurant.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Single listed source: Fast foods, chicken tenders

    USDA derives this record from one listed source-input row at 100 g. Real preparations can still differ in water, cooking state, brand, and served weight.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “breaded; from fast food” fits. Inspect FDC 2706100 when “breaded; from restaurant” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food

Exact source wording
“Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706099 · FNDDS 24198741
Named qualifiers
breaded · from fast food

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from restaurant

Exact source wording
“Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from restaurant”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706100 · FNDDS 24198742
Named qualifiers
breaded · from restaurant
Source inputs unique in this pair
Fat, chicken · Salt, table

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “breaded” and “from fast food”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordChicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food 100 g271 kcal 271 kcal 19.2 g 14 g 1.2 g 769 mg
Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from restaurant 100 g283 kcal 283 kcal 18.8 g 15.6 g 1.2 g 791 mg
Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from frozen 80 g192 kcal 240 kcal 14.6 g 13.6 g 1.7 g 527 mg
Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from school lunch 80 g216 kcal 270 kcal 15.7 g 12.9 g 2.2 g 511 mg
Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from other sources 100 g262 kcal 262 kcal 17.8 g 13.8 g 1.4 g 696 mg
Chicken nuggets, from fast food 80 g246 kcal 307 kcal 15.9 g 20.4 g 0.9 g 594 mg
Chicken patty, breaded 75 g215 kcal 287 kcal 14.8 g 19.6 g 0.3 g 532 mg

How to compare FDC 2706099: its source amount is 100 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706099, the 4 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 tender, strip, or finger

136 kcal

50 g

1 popcorn chicken

27 kcal

10 g

1 chicken fry

38 kcal

14 g

1 cup

379 kcal

140 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706099, Sodium is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Sodium

769 mg≈ 33% Daily Value

Total fat

14 g≈ 18% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706099’s 100 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706099 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 19.2 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2706099 at 100 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 769 mg sodium, about 33% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 100 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 271 kcal Not established
Protein 19.2 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 17.2 g 6%
Total fat 14 g 18%
Dietary fiber 1.2 g 4%
Sugars 0.4 g Not established
Sodium 769 mg 33%
Saturated fat 2.5 g 12%
Monounsaturated Fat 4.8 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 5.8 g Not established
Cholesterol 48 mg 16%
Potassium 373 mg 8%
Calcium 17 mg 1%
Iron 0.7 mg 4%
Magnesium 28 mg 7%
Vitamin C 1.1 mg 1%
Vitamin D 0.2 µg 1%
Vitamin A 3 µg 0%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 46.6 g Not established

For FDC 2706099, approximate percentages divide the displayed 100 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706099 to one source input totaling 100 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

A single-source formulation

Fast foods, chicken tenders is the only listed source input for this record. That does not mean every real-world version is identical; brands, preparation, water content, and portion weight can still differ.

100 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Fast foods, chicken tendersUSDA ingredient 21401 100 GM 100 g 100%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706099, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Chicken patties, nuggets and tenders” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

This record

Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food

USDA category
Chicken patties, nuggets and tenders
FDC ID
2706099
FNDDS code
24198741
Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories271 kcal283 kcal−12 kcal
Protein19.2 g18.8 g+0.4 g
Carbohydrate17.2 g16.9 g+0.3 g
Total fat14 g15.6 g−1.6 g
Dietary fiber1.2 g1.2 gSame listed value
Sodium769 mg791 mg−22 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 1.6 g less total fat than “Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from restaurant.”

Only the comparison record lists Fat, chicken; Salt, table. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

1 of the six displayed differences clears the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Fast foods, chicken tenders.

Listed only in the comparison: Fat, chicken; Salt, table.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 100 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (140 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 100 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (140 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706099 with FDC 2706100 at equal mass; use their 100 g and 100 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706099 versus FDC 2706100 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full chicken patties, nuggets and tenders source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2706099 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with restaurant formulation and serving size, portion size, cut and fat trim, cooking method.

For “Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food,” resolve restaurant formulation and serving size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    restaurant formulation and serving size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  3. 03

    cut and fat trim

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706099 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 271 kcal per 100 g becomes 271 kcal at 100 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706099

FNDDS food code: 24198741

The scaling for FDC 2706099 can be exact while the match to “Chicken tenders or strips, breaded, from fast food” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 100 g weight, 1-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.