USDA ingredient referenceUpdated

Peas, canned, drained solids, unprepared in 4 Feast-indexed USDA foods

Within Feast’s 3,850-record USDA FNDDS reference corpus, “Peas, canned, drained solids, unprepared” appears as a formulation input in 4 finished-food records. Their calories and nutrients describe those complete foods, not the input label by itself. Use the catalog to choose the closest finished food and open its exact FoodData Central citation.

Browse all 4 linked food records →
Exact nutrition reference, complete food catalog and source methodology

This page helps you find complete foods that include Peas, canned, drained solids, unprepared in USDA’s nutrition data. Choose the record that most closely matches what you ate; Feast does not turn a collection average into a standalone ingredient estimate.

What the code means

One exact source label across 4 complete records.

Every occurrence collected here uses ingredient code 11308 and the source description “Peas, green (includes baby and lesuer types), canned, drained solids, unprepared.” The code is preserved exactly as it appears in the FNDDS input-food rows. It is not a FoodData Central FDC ID, so this page does not invent a standalone ingredient-record URL.

The strongest concentrations of linked records are currently Other vegetables and combinations (2), Other starchy vegetables (1), Soups, broth-based (1). These are category counts within Feast’s selected 3,850-record corpus. They do not estimate how often the ingredient is eaten, how common it is in recipes generally, or its prevalence across every FNDDS release.

Collection-level interpretation

Grounded ways to understand this source label

These summaries describe the linked FNDDS records in this exact corpus. They do not estimate consumer frequency, market share, or the composition of a meal. This is a very small set of 4 records: each observation can move the percentages, buckets, and interpolated quartiles substantially, so read the complete catalog rather than treating the summaries as stable population estimates.

Typical listed-weight range

38.8%–62.5%

The middle half of linked records spans 23.7 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.

Largest linked category

Other vegetables and combinations

2 of 4 linked records (50%) sit in this USDA category. The remainder span 2 other categories.

Most populated share band

30% to under 60%

2 records (50%) fall in this band after repeated rows for code 11308 are combined within each food.

Where USDA uses this input

Linked records by source-food category

Each record is counted once even if ingredient code 11308 appears on more than one input row inside that formulation. The category grouping describes the complete linked foods, not a culinary rule about the ingredient.

USDA survey-food categories

Important nutrition boundary

This collection does not support a verified standalone nutrition answer for “Peas, green (includes baby and lesuer types), canned, drained solids, unprepared.”

No unique exact food-code match or reviewed sole-source bridge qualifies for a direct consumer answer. Feast therefore does not treat the collection median, minimum, maximum, or an arbitrary similar record as the nutrition of this input.

The table below describes the complete linked foods per 100 grams. Use it to find a closer finished-food record, not to infer what this formulation input supplies on its own.

Compare complete food records

Nutrient span across the linked foods

Every value in this table describes an entire USDA survey-food record per 100 grams. The values are not the nutrient content of ingredient code 11308, and differences cannot be attributed to this one input.

Nutrient span across complete food records linked to this source ingredient code
Whole-record nutrientObserved minimumMiddle 50%MedianObserved maximumLinked records
Caloriesper 100 g of the complete food46 kcal63–89 kcal68 kcal151 kcal4
Proteinper 100 g of the complete food2.5 g2.5–6.4 g3.5 g12.1 g4
Carbohydrateper 100 g of the complete food8.2 g8.4–12.7 g9.9 g16.5 g4
Total fatper 100 g of the complete food0.5 g0.7–3.3 g1.9 g4 g4
Dietary fiberper 100 g of the complete food1.4 g2.7–3.6 g3.2 g4.9 g4
Sodiumper 100 g of the complete food258 mg259–393 mg266 mg754 mg4

The minimum and maximum preserve the complete observed span. The median is the middle linked-record value, not a prediction for a meal and not an ingredient-specific nutrient estimate.

Complete linked catalog

All 4 Feast-indexed food records that list code 11308

This is the complete qualifying-corpus catalog, not a hand-picked sample. Search by food name or USDA category, then open a profile for household portions, Feast’s 21-nutrient panel, formulation details, and its exact FDC citation.

Complete USDA food-record catalog linked to this source ingredient code
Linked USDA food recordUSDA categoryFormulationListed input weightWeight shareCaloriesProteinSodiumCitation
Green peas, canned, cooked, no added fat Other starchy vegetables Sole source 100 g 100% 68 kcal 4.5 g 273 mg FDC 2709961 ↗
Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, fat added Other vegetables and combinations 3 input rows 50 g 48.5% 68 kcal 2.5 g 259 mg FDC 2709690 ↗
Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, no added fat Other vegetables and combinations 2 input rows 50 g 50% 46 kcal 2.6 g 258 mg FDC 2709686 ↗
Soupy rice with chicken, Puerto Rican style Soups, broth-based 14 input rows 453.6 g 9.6% 151 kcal 12.1 g 754 mg FDC 2708974 ↗

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 4 exact records behind Peas, green (includes baby and lesuer types), canned, drained solids, unprepared (USDA input 11308). Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Soupy rice with chicken, Puerto Rican style is higher in total fat per 100 g

Soupy rice with chicken, Puerto Rican style reports 4 g versus 0.5 g for Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, no added fat: a 3.5 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, no added fat is denser; Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, fat added is higher in its source amount

Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, no added fat reports 2.6 g per 100 g and 2 g in USDA source amount (80 g). Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, fat added reports a lower 2.5 g per 100 g but a higher 2.1 g in USDA source amount (83 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, fat added” from “Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, no added fat”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Peas, green (includes baby and lesuer types), canned, drained solids, unprepared (USDA input 11308), each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Peas and carrots

Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, fat added and Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, no added fat are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Best next guide for this exact record Green peas

Green peas, canned, cooked, no added fat is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Green peas, canned, cooked, no added fat vs Green peas, cooked, from restaurant

Green peas, canned, cooked, no added fat is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Added-fat wording: no added fat versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Green peas, canned, cooked, no added fat vs Green peas, raw

Green peas, canned, cooked, no added fat is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, water, tap, drinking

USDA input 14411 appears in 1 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 2,133–2,133 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Chicken, NS as to part, rotisserie, skin not eaten

USDA input 24102070 appears in 1 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 1,008–1,008 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
2 context records in this source topic Other vegetables and combinations

Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, fat added and Peas and carrots, canned, cooked, no added fat belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path

Method and provenance

How this ingredient-centered page was calculated

Feast begins with its pinned 3,850-record USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods reference corpus for FNDDS 2021–2023. Each exact food profile retains its FDC identifier, source-food description, nutrient values, household measures, and positive-weight input-food rows. This page groups those input rows by the exact ingredient code 11308; it does not merge similar-looking ingredient names or infer synonyms.

The distinct-record count deduplicates by FDC food record. When the same code is listed more than once inside one source formulation, its input weights are added before the listed-weight share is calculated. Category counts also count each food once. The 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile use the sorted one-share-per-food values with linear interpolation between adjacent ranks when a percentile falls between two records.

USDA’s current FNDDS documentation explains that many nutrient profiles are generated with calculation recipes designed to represent multiple variants, and that their input codes are not necessarily the exact ingredients in a retail product or an ingredient declaration. It also documents moisture and nutrient-retention adjustments. Feast therefore treats these rows as transparent source-calculation evidence—not as a reverse-engineered recipe.

The complete-food nutrient table uses each linked record’s available published per-100-gram values so the denominator remains consistent; its middle-50% ranges use the same interpolated percentile method. It is presented for record selection and comparison only. No nutrient value is reassigned to the ingredient, no causal effect is inferred, and no “healthy” score is manufactured from the collection.

How to apply the evidence to a meal

Use the ingredient as a discovery clue. Compare the linked record names, food categories, preparation wording, source formulation, and portion measures. If a close record exists, its complete profile can provide a defensible reference estimate. If the meal differs materially in cooking fat, sauce, ingredient ratios, or portion size, keep looking or use recipe weights, a package label, or an editable photo estimate instead.

These pages are educational source indexes. They do not provide medical advice, personalized nutrient targets, food-safety guidance, or a recipe. If a clinician has given you individualized dietary instructions, follow that guidance and use the most specific current source available for the food you actually consumed.