USDA source topicVegetables

USDA Broccoli records: median 47 calories per 100 g across 12 foods

Across 12 exact USDA Survey Foods records in this topic, median energy is 47 kcal per 100 grams and the central 80% runs from 26 kcal to 66 kcal. These are collection statistics, not a calorie estimate for a particular meal.

The complete collection preserves all 12 source descriptions, household measures, nutrient distributions, and FoodData Central citations so the summary can be checked against the underlying records.

Looking for serving calories?

Use the consumer meal guide

This page owns the complete USDA category dataset. The guide is designed to help you compare named servings and choose a close meal description.

Read the Broccoli guide →

Distribution at a glance

Where calorie density sits in this USDA record set

Percentiles summarize these 12 cited records; they are not a confidence interval or a prediction for one meal.

  1. 10th percentile 26 kcal
    26 kcal
  2. Median 47 kcal
    47 kcal
  3. 90th percentile 66 kcal
    66 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What is included?

The exact descriptions define the topic.

USDA places these records in the “Broccoli” survey-food category. Within Feast’s broader navigation, they appear under Vegetables (12 records). The category label is useful for discovery, but it does not mean every record uses the same recipe, brand, cooking method, or portion.

The current collection includes Broccoli, chinese, raw; Broccoli raab, cooked; Broccoli, fresh, cooked with oil; Broccoli raab, raw; Broccoli, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine; Broccoli, raw. Those examples show why the exact wording matters. The complete alphabetical catalog farther down the page preserves all 12 descriptions instead of replacing them with one generic average.

A distribution view of the source set

Median and central nutrient ranges per 100 grams

The central range runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the 12 records on this page. It shows the middle of this finite source set without treating its endpoints as typical. Because this topic contains fewer than 20 records, treat the percentile positions as a compact map of the listed entries—not as a stable population estimate.

On smaller screens, focus a topic table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Median, central interval, and observed per-100-gram nutrient span for this USDA source topic
NutrientMedianCentral 80%Observed spanRecords
Caloriesper 100 g47 kcal26 kcal–66 kcal22 kcal–77 kcal12
Proteinper 100 g2.6 g1.4 g–3.2 g1.2 g–3.2 g12
Carbohydrateper 100 g5.3 g3.1 g–6.3 g2.9 g–6.5 g12
Total fatper 100 g2.5 g0.3 g–3.4 g0.1 g–4.7 g12
Dietary fiberper 100 g2.6 g2.4 g–2.9 g2.4 g–3 g12
Total sugarsper 100 g1.4 g0.4 g–1.4 g0.4 g–1.5 g12
Sodiumper 100 g137 mg33 mg–170 mg7 mg–241 mg12
Potassiumper 100 g276 mg138 mg–306 mg137 mg–315 mg12
Calciumper 100 g47 mg33 mg–108 mg32 mg–109 mg12
Ironper 100 g0.7 mg0.6 mg–2 mg0.6 mg–2.2 mg12

All rows use the same 100-gram denominator and values from the cited records. The interval is descriptive, not a recommended intake range or statistical confidence interval.

A comparatively wide central spread

Calcium: 47 mg calculated median

Among 12 “Broccoli” records, the central interval for calcium extends from 33 mg to 108 mg per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 32 mg to 109 mg.

10th percentile: Broccoli, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine reports 33 mg, exactly matching this calculated boundary.

90th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 106 mg in Broccoli, Chinese, cooked and 108 mg in Broccoli raab, raw; it is not itself an observed record value.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Iron: 0.7 mg calculated median

Among 12 “Broccoli” records, the central interval for iron extends from 0.6 mg to 2 mg per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 0.6 mg to 2.2 mg.

10th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 0.6 mg in Broccoli, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine and 0.6 mg in Broccoli, Chinese, cooked; it is not itself an observed record value.

90th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 0.7 mg in Broccoli, fresh, cooked, no added fat and 2.1 mg in Broccoli raab, raw; it is not itself an observed record value.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Total fat: 2.5 g calculated median

Among 12 “Broccoli” records, the central interval for total fat extends from 0.3 g to 3.4 g per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 0.1 g to 4.7 g.

10th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 0.3 g in Broccoli, raw and 0.4 g in Broccoli, fresh, cooked, no added fat; it is not itself an observed record value.

90th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 3.4 g in Broccoli, fresh, cooked with oil and 3.4 g in Broccoli, Chinese, cooked; it is not itself an observed record value.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

The three callouts above are the widest central spreads relative to each metric’s midpoint, with a minimum scale applied so near-zero medians do not dominate. The complete table remains the primary record of all ten metrics.

Preparation language in the records

Source descriptions reveal meaningful distinctions.

The counts below report words and phrases that appear explicitly in the 12 USDA descriptions. They can help narrow a search to a closer record. They do not prove that the named preparation caused a nutrient difference, because these survey-food records are not controlled experiments.

cooked

9 records use this wording, including Broccoli raab, cooked; Broccoli, Chinese, cooked; Broccoli, cooked, from restaurant.

frozen

3 records use this wording, including Broccoli, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine; Broccoli, frozen, cooked with oil; Broccoli, frozen, cooked, no added fat.

raw

3 records use this wording, including Broccoli raab, raw; Broccoli, chinese, raw; Broccoli, raw.

no added fat

2 records use this wording, including Broccoli, fresh, cooked, no added fat; Broccoli, frozen, cooked, no added fat.

restaurant

1 record uses this wording, including Broccoli, cooked, from restaurant.

Portion context

Household measures answer a different question than 100 grams.

12 of 12 records (100%) include at least one named measure in the source data. Together those records provide 35 usable named measures.

A cup, slice, piece, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can represent a different amount of food. Even two measures with the same label may have different gram weights across records. Open the closest profile and use its listed weight instead of transferring a measure from another record.

USDA’s representative source amount is also not necessarily what a visitor ate. For equal-weight comparison, use the 100-gram table. For meal estimation, match the exact description first, then match the amount, and finally account for additions or preparation details absent from the selected record.

Common named measures in this topic

Choosing a closer record

Use a sequence, not a guess disguised as precision.

  1. 01

    Match the exact description

    Look for the closest food name, preparation, additions, and context. “Broccoli” is the collection label; the individual description is the actual reference.

  2. 02

    Compare on equal weight

    Use the per-100-gram values when comparing two records. This keeps the denominator fixed and prevents different source-serving weights from masquerading as a food difference.

  3. 03

    Scale the closest listed measure

    Open the profile, select a named household measure when one fits, or enter a gram estimate. Treat scaled decimals as arithmetic from the source—not greater certainty about the plate.

  4. 04

    Add missing context

    Brand, recipe, cooking fat, sauce, toppings, substitutions, and edible portion can move the result. A current package label or weighed recipe may be more specific than a generic survey-food record.

Complete source catalog

All 12 “Broccoli” records

Records are alphabetical, not ranked. Every row links to a Feast profile with household measures, the 21-nutrient Feast panel, estimate factors, methodology, and the exact USDA FoodData Central source where available.

Complete alphabetical catalog of USDA records in this source topic
Exact USDA descriptionCaloriesProteinFiberSodiumSource amountReferences
Broccoli raab, cookedFDC 2709573 46 kcalper 100 g 3.2 gper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 159 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli raab, rawFDC 2709572 22 kcalper 100 g 3.2 gper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 33 mgper 100 g 20 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, Chinese, cookedFDC 2709658 50 kcalper 100 g 1.2 gper 100 g 2.6 gper 100 g 133 mgper 100 g 44 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, chinese, rawFDC 2709657 26 kcalper 100 g 1.2 gper 100 g 2.6 gper 100 g 7 mgper 100 g 18 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, cooked, from restaurantFDC 2709644 77 kcalper 100 g 2.6 gper 100 g 2.4 gper 100 g 241 mgper 100 g 80 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, fresh, cooked with butter or margarineFDC 2709651 60 kcalper 100 g 2.6 gper 100 g 2.4 gper 100 g 171 mgper 100 g 80 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, fresh, cooked with oilFDC 2709650 67 kcalper 100 g 2.6 gper 100 g 2.4 gper 100 g 153 mgper 100 g 80 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, fresh, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709645 41 kcalper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 2.5 gper 100 g 158 mgper 100 g 78 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, frozen, cooked with butter or margarineFDC 2709653 47 kcalper 100 g 3 gper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 140 mgper 100 g 95 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, frozen, cooked with oilFDC 2709652 53 kcalper 100 g 3 gper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 123 mgper 100 g 95 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, frozen, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709646 28 kcalper 100 g 3.1 gper 100 g 3 gper 100 g 127 mgper 100 g 93 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Broccoli, rawFDC 2709643 39 kcalper 100 g 2.6 gper 100 g 2.4 gper 100 g 36 mgper 100 g 45 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗

Boundaries and provenance

What this collection can—and cannot—tell you.

This page summarizes USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) records from 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024. FNDDS supplies the nutrient profiles used for foods reported in What We Eat in America, the dietary component of NHANES. Each value here remains tied to one exact FDC record; the complete catalog provides direct links so the source can be checked rather than taken on trust.

USDA describes FNDDS nutrient profiles as average values for generic representations of foods likely consumed in the United States—not profiles of specific products. Its gram weights for portions are likewise estimates for groups of foods and may not cover every available size. That distinction matters: a database measure is evidence for scaling a plausible match, not proof that the same weight or formulation was on a visitor’s plate.

The records are not laboratory measurements of every possible “Broccoli” preparation. Restaurant recipes change, packaged products are reformulated, homemade ingredient ratios vary, and cooking can change water weight. A photo also cannot reliably reveal every hidden ingredient or gram weight. The central range describes variation among the records selected for this topic, not uncertainty around a single meal.

The median is not a default calorie count. The 10th and 90th percentiles are not lower and upper recommendations. The minimum and maximum are not promises that every real version falls inside the observed span. These statistics are tools for navigating a source collection while keeping the denominator, record name, and normal recipe variation visible.

Nutrient values do not establish whether a food is appropriate for a particular person or condition. This wiki does not diagnose deficiencies, prescribe targets, or replace advice from a qualified professional. If accuracy matters for an allergy, medical diet, or clinician-directed limit, use verified ingredient information and the guidance relevant to that situation.

Why no overall ranking appears.

A record can report more protein and also differ in sodium, fiber, energy, fat, portion weight, or ingredients. Choosing one metric as a universal score would hide those tradeoffs and imply a value judgment the data cannot support. The alphabetical catalog and side-by-side statistics are intentionally descriptive.

For primary-source context, read USDA’s FNDDS 2021–2023 documentation. For Feast’s import, filtering, portion-scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules, read the nutrition-page methodology. For an exact item, use its profile and FoodData Central link rather than citing this collection-level summary alone.

Common questions

Using the “Broccoli” collection responsibly

Is the median the expected nutrition for my food?

No. It is the middle value among these 12 source records on a 100-gram basis. Your recipe, brand, preparation, and portion may align more closely with one specific record or may fall outside this collection.

Why compare 100 grams instead of one serving?

Source servings can have different gram weights and measure labels. Holding weight at 100 grams makes concentration comparable. After choosing a record, its household measures are more useful for estimating the amount actually eaten.

Does the upper end of a nutrient range mean “better”?

No. The position only describes that nutrient within this source collection. It does not evaluate the whole food, determine an appropriate portion, or account for an individual’s needs.

Which number should I log?

Start with the record whose exact wording most closely matches the food. Use a listed measure or gram estimate, then add missing recipe or preparation context. Keep the result as an estimate unless you have a current label or weighed recipe.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 9 exact records behind Broccoli source topic. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Broccoli raab, cooked is higher in calcium per 100 g

Broccoli raab, cooked reports 109 mg versus 33 mg for Broccoli, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine: a 76 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Broccoli, chinese, raw is denser; Broccoli, fresh, cooked with oil is higher in its source amount

Broccoli, chinese, raw reports 105 mg per 100 g and 19 mg in USDA source amount (18 g). Broccoli, fresh, cooked with oil reports a lower 47 mg per 100 g but a higher 38 mg in USDA source amount (80 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Broccoli, chinese, raw” from “Broccoli, Chinese, cooked”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Broccoli source topic, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Broccoli

Broccoli, Chinese, cooked and Broccoli, chinese, raw are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 33 mg in Broccoli, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine to 109 mg in Broccoli raab, cooked, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Salt, table

USDA input 2047 appears in 6 of 9 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 0.3–0.5 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Broccoli, raw

USDA input 11090 appears in 4 of 9 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 7 mg in Broccoli, chinese, raw to 241 mg in Broccoli, cooked, from restaurant, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Inspect an exact record Broccoli, chinese, raw

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709657 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path
9 records share this broad food family Vegetables: broader category context

Broccoli, chinese, raw and Broccoli raab, cooked, plus 7 more are assigned to Feast’s Vegetables editorial category. Use the category page to compare nearby foods at a broad level; keep the exact USDA descriptions on this page for record-level decisions.

Follow this evidence path