Potato chips100 g vs 100 gTwo cited FDC recordsUpdated

Potato sticks: flavored vs plain USDA FDC 2709445 vs 2709444

Per 100 g, flavored reports 1,010 mg sodium, while plain reports 633 mg sodium.

The comparison uses two cited USDA records. Their complete source names, household portions, nutrient values, and FoodData Central links remain visible below.

Record A · FDC 2709445

Potato sticks, flavored

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Record B · FDC 2709444

Potato sticks, plain

Check this record in FoodData Central ↗

Highlighted difference

Sodium at the same 100-gram weight

Bar length shows the two cited values on one shared denominator. It does not rank either food or establish why they differ.

  1. 1,010 mg
  2. 633 mg

Shared basis: 100 g · mg

Equal-weight evidence

Nutrition per 100 grams

Both columns use the same mass, which compares nutrient concentration without allowing the two representative source amounts to change the denominator. “A +” or “B +” reports the arithmetic difference between the cited values; it is not a quality score.

On smaller screens, focus a comparison table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Per-100-gram nutrient comparison for Potato sticks, flavored and Potato sticks, plain
NutrientA · Potato sticks, flavoredB · Potato sticks, plainDifference
Calories 517 kcal 522 kcal B +5 kcal
Protein 6.6 g 6.7 g B +0.1 g
Total fat 34.1 g 34.4 g B +0.3 g
Carbohydrate 52.8 g 53.3 g B +0.5 g
Dietary fiber 3.4 g 3.4 g Same reported value
Total sugars 0.2 g 0.2 g Same reported value
SodiumMaterial difference 1,010 mg 633 mg A +377 mg
Saturated fat 8.8 g 8.9 g B +0.1 g
Potassium 1,220 mg 1,240 mg B +20 mg
Calcium 18 mg 18 mg Same reported value
Iron 2.3 mg 2.3 mg No difference at displayed precision

Values come from the two cited USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods records. Feast does not average records, impute missing values, or infer a nutrient from the food name.

Read the table by question

Every material primary-nutrient difference on this page is numerically higher in A (1 of 1).

These answers describe concentration per 100 grams. “More” and “less” identify the arithmetic direction only; they do not decide which record is a better match or which food is better for a person.

Which reports fewer calories?

Record A

Record A reports 517 kcal, compared with 522 kcal in the other record—a difference of 5 kcal.

Which reports more protein?

Record B

Record B reports 6.7 g, compared with 6.6 g in the other record—a difference of 0.1 g.

Which reports more fiber?

Same reported value

Both records report 3.4 g of fiber per 100 g.

Which reports less sodium?

Record B

Record B reports 633 mg, compared with 1,010 mg in the other record—a difference of 377 mg.

What differs in the source descriptions

The exact names carry information the numbers cannot.

USDA assigns both records to “Potato chips,” but the topic label is broad. Record A is “Potato sticks, flavored.” Record B is “Potato sticks, plain.” Feast paired them because their contrast-neutral food identities are an exact match, not merely because they share a generic category.

No controlled preparation phrase is needed to explain this pairing. The close source names instead differ in narrow food or ingredient terms. Record A has the distinctive neutral terms shown in its exact name; Record B has the corresponding terms shown in its exact name. Read the full descriptions before selecting either profile.

Even a clean name contrast can carry hidden companions. A fried record may also include coating; a restaurant record can use a different recipe; a reduced-sodium description can differ in more than salt; and a source amount can reflect a different reporting convention. That is why this page reports the complete pair rather than treating one word as an intervention.

Portion context

A representative source amount is not a shared “serving.”

Record A uses USDA reference amount at 28 g. Record B uses USDA reference amount at 28 g. Those labels and gram weights come from their respective records. They are useful for scaling the chosen profile, but they are not recommendations and need not describe equal amounts.

The representative amounts do not cross Feast’s material portion-difference threshold of both 15 grams and 20%. They are still separate source measures, so the 100-gram table remains the appropriate place for an equal-weight comparison.

A cup, piece, slice, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can have different gram weights across records. A matching label is not enough: check the listed grams. If accuracy matters more than convenience, weighing the food or using a current package label can be more specific than a generic survey-food measure.

Record A measures

  • 10 sticks3 g
  • 1 small single serving bag28 g
  • 1 medium single serving bag57 g
  • 1 large single serving bag85 g
  • 1 100 calorie package18 g
  • 1 cup38 g
  • USDA reference amount28 g
Scale record A →

Record B measures

  • 10 sticks3 g
  • 1 small single serving bag28 g
  • 1 medium single serving bag57 g
  • 1 large single serving bag85 g
  • 1 100 calorie package18 g
  • 1 cup38 g
  • USDA reference amount28 g
Scale record B →

One shared household label

1 medium single serving bag: 57 g in A vs 57 g in B

Here the household label and listed gram weight match at displayed precision, so this particular table is also an equal-mass comparison. The values remain specific to these two source records, not a universal weight for every 1 medium single serving bag.

Nutrition for one 1 medium single serving bag using each record’s own source gram weight
NutrientA · 57 gB · 57 g
Calories295 kcal298 kcal
Protein3.8 g3.8 g
Dietary fiber1.9 g1.9 g
Sodium576 mg361 mg

USDA source formulation evidence

The listed inputs provide another way to audit the match.

FNDDS includes input-food rows behind each standardized survey-food record. Record A’s leading listed inputs include Snacks, potato sticks, Salt, table. Record B’s include Snacks, potato sticks. Ingredient-code overlap is 50%, and normalized listed-input-weight variation is 1%.

Record A · 2 coded inputs

Potato sticks, flavored

  1. Snacks, potato sticksIngredient code 19415 · open source index
    99% of listed input weight
  2. Salt, tableIngredient code 2047 · open source index
    1% of listed input weight

Record B · 1 coded input

Potato sticks, plain

  1. Snacks, potato sticksIngredient code 19415 · open source index
    100% of listed input weight

1 shared coded input

The largest shared entries include Snacks, potato sticks. Shared codes can still carry different listed weights.

1 A-only and 0 B-only coded inputs

A-only entries include Salt, table.

Important: repeated rows carrying the same ingredient code are combined before the shares and overlap are calculated. These weights belong to USDA’s source formulation: they are not a reconstructed plate, final cooked yield, visitor serving, ingredient declaration, or estimate of what is visible in a photo. USDA’s FNDDS documentation explains that these calculation recipes can represent multiple variants, may include retention or moisture adjustments, and are not product-label ingredient lists.

Choosing the closer record

Match context first; scale second.

  1. 01

    Read both names literally

    Compare cooking method, coating, edible skin or peel, sauce, additions, venue, source form, and food subtype. For this pair, the full A and B descriptions above are the evidence—not shortened search labels.

  2. 02

    Use listed inputs as a check

    If the name still leaves ambiguity, compare the leading and unique source inputs. They can reveal that two near names refer to meaningfully different standardized formulations, but they do not reconstruct your dish.

  3. 03

    Choose an amount for that record

    After choosing A or B, use its own named measure and gram weight. Do not transfer a cup, slice, or “typical amount” from the other record as if the measures were interchangeable.

  4. 04

    Account for missing details

    Brand, current restaurant recipe, cooking oil, drained weight, toppings, substitutions, and unfinished portions may not be captured. A label or weighed recipe can supersede a generic reference when it better matches the actual food.

Limits and responsible interpretation

This is a comparison of records, not a causal study.

The two records come from 2021–2023 FoodData Central Survey Foods data. The nutrient table faithfully compares their published values on the same weight basis. It does not measure two plates prepared at the same time, isolate one ingredient, or estimate the uncertainty around either value.

For this pair, the source names differ across narrow identity terms in the exact source names, while the listed formulations show 50% ingredient-code overlap and 1% normalized listed-weight variation. Moisture, ingredient proportions, preparation, and record construction can therefore move together. The page can describe the combined record difference; it cannot isolate the effect of one word.

A higher or lower number is not an overall verdict. Protein, fiber, sodium, energy, fat, micronutrients, preferences, allergies, budget, portion, and an individual’s goals answer different questions. Feast therefore reports directions and magnitudes without applying a universal “healthier” label.

This page is educational and does not diagnose a condition, prescribe a target, or replace advice from a qualified professional. For an allergy, medically directed diet, or strict ingredient limit, use verified ingredient information and guidance appropriate to that situation.

How this page qualified

A page is published only when the pair clears materiality and diversity gates.

Both records must occupy the same USDA survey-food topic and share a close food identity after a controlled vocabulary separates preparation, edible-part, source, claim, crust, and sauce wording. Exact contrast-neutral identities receive priority. Close ingredient or form substitutions can qualify when name overlap remains high and the numerical evidence is material.

For primary nutrients, Feast requires both an absolute and relative difference: at least 20 kcal and 12% for energy; 2 g and 18% for protein or fat; 5 g and 15% for carbohydrate; 1 g and 20% for fiber; 4 g and 20% for sugars; or 100 mg and 20% for sodium. A focused one-nutrient pair also needs a material representative-amount or formulation distinction. Rounding-only pairs are not published.

Unordered FDC IDs define a canonical pair, so reversing A and B cannot create another page. Each source record can appear twice at most, each USDA topic contributes no more than 40 pages, and closely repeated identity families are capped. Those rules produced a selective comparison library rather than every mathematical combination in the corpus.

Read the complete nutrition-page methodology for import, nutrient mapping, portion scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Potato sticks, flavored versus Potato sticks, plain. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Potato sticks, flavored is higher in sodium per 100 g

Potato sticks, flavored reports 1,010 mg versus 633 mg for Potato sticks, plain: a 377 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

2 listed servings each weigh 28 g

The 2 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 28 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Potato sticks, flavored” from “Potato sticks, plain”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Potato sticks, flavored versus Potato sticks, plain, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Potato sticks

Potato sticks, flavored and Potato sticks, plain are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 633 mg in Potato sticks, plain to 1,010 mg in Potato sticks, flavored, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Salt, table

USDA input 2047 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 1–1 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
2 context records in this source topic Potato chips

Potato sticks, flavored and Potato sticks, plain belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path
A shared source-formulation input Snacks, potato sticks

USDA input 19415 appears in 2 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
Inspect an exact record Potato sticks, flavored

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709445 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path
Check another exact record Potato sticks, plain

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709444 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path