Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Beef with carrots/greens without potatoes calories per cup: 274–290 across all 2 named USDA examples

Across all 2 named USDA examples, a cup contains 274–290 calories. Their listed weights span 249–252 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 189 g

217calories

Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce

Protein
14.7 g
Carbs
9.9 g
Fat
13.5 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706735 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 2 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 2 exact records in this guide report 206–217 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 110–115 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes, begin by separating “Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce” from “Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 2 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes records compare at 100 grams

All 2 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce 110 kcal
    110 kcal
  2. Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce 115 kcal
    115 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 2 named USDA records in view: 2 direct matches. All sit within “Meat mixed dishes.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 2 records together under the exact grouping key “beef with vegetables including carrots.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes, this page can compare 2 named records from FDC 2706735 through FDC 2706731. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

187–189 g before composition

The largest source amount is 1.0× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.

Composition

5 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “tomato-based sauce”; the higher is “mushroom sauce.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

0.6 g fiber gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “mushroom sauce” (1.1 g) and “tomato-based sauce” (1.7 g).

Observed source examples

Both records, with their own serving weights intact

The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes.

Important: “Lower” begins with Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce; “higher” ends with Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce Direct name match 189 gUSDA reference amount 217 kcal 115 14.7 g 2.1 g 580 mg FDC 2706735 ↗
Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce Direct name match 187 gUSDA reference amount 206 kcal 110 15.4 g 3.2 g 561 mg FDC 2706731 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

The listed source amounts run from 187 to 189 grams—a 2-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 206 calories for “tomato-based sauce” to 217 for “mushroom sauce.” At a fixed 100 grams, “tomato-based sauce” is 110 calories and “mushroom sauce” is 115—a fixed-weight separation of 5 calories. For Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce” and “broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled, broccoli, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, and carrots, frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt; differentiating rows include milk, nfs, salt, table, soup, cream of mushroom, canned, condensed, and tomato products, canned, sauce. On this Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes” cannot resolve the differences between Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce and Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    Source weight before serving calories

    The source amounts span 187–189 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce” and “broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled and broccoli, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt; rows that vary across the set include milk, nfs, salt, table, and soup, cream of mushroom, canned, condensed. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Beef with vegetables including carrots, …, mushroom sauce” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce” and “broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce is higher in calcium per 100 g

Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce reports 33 mg versus 19 mg for Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce: a 14 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Check the weight before comparing serving totals

Source amounts span 187–189 g

Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce uses USDA source amount (187 g), while Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce uses USDA source amount (189 g). Use per 100 g for equal-weight composition; use the serving column only when those named source amounts answer your question.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce” from “Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark green leafy vegetables without potatoes source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

A formulation detail that separates records Milk, NFS

USDA input 11100000 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 10–10 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Salt, table

USDA input 2047 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 0.1–0.1 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce vs Ham, potatoes, and vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no sauce

Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Sauce wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus no sauce; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce vs Beef, potatoes, and vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no sauce

Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Sauce wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus no sauce; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic Meat mixed dishes

Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce and Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 19 mg in Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce to 33 mg in Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Potassium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, potassium runs from 145 mg in Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, mushroom sauce to 248 mg in Beef with vegetables including carrots, broccoli, and/or dark-green leafy; no potatoes, tomato-based sauce, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path