Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Chicken wing fried coated calories per drummette: 64–71 across all 4 named USDA examples

Across all 4 named USDA examples, a drummette contains 64–71 calories. Each included example lists 22 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 110 g

355calories

Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food

Protein
19.6 g
Carbs
16.5 g
Fat
23.4 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706067 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 4 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 4 exact records in this guide report 318–355 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 289–323 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Chicken wing fried coated, begin by separating “Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food” from “Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 4 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How chicken wing fried coated records compare at 100 grams

All 4 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Chicken wing, fried, coated, from raw 289 kcal
    289 kcal
  2. Chicken wing, fried, coated, from pre-cooked 294 kcal
    294 kcal
  3. Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food 323 kcal
    323 kcal
  4. Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant 323 kcal
    323 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 4 named USDA records in view: 4 direct matches. All sit within “Chicken, whole pieces.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first two description segments” placed these 4 records together under the exact grouping key “chicken wing fried.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Chicken wing fried coated, this page can compare 4 named records from FDC 2706067 through FDC 2706068. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

A shared 110 g comparison anchor

Equal source weights make the selected Chicken wing fried coated serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.

Composition

34 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “from raw”; the higher is “from restaurant.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

424 mg sodium gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “from raw” (419 mg) and “from restaurant” (843 mg).

Observed source examples

Three landmarks inside this source set—not universal endpoints

These 4 records each use a 110 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every chicken wing fried coated; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.

Important: “Lower” begins with Chicken wing, fried, coated, from raw; “higher” ends with Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every chicken wing fried coated meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Chicken wing fried coated, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Chicken wing fried coated nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food Direct name match 110 gUSDA reference amount 355 kcal 323 19.6 g 0.3 g 927 mg FDC 2706067 ↗
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from pre-cooked Direct name match 110 gUSDA reference amount 323 kcal 294 20.5 g 0.3 g 507 mg FDC 2706066 ↗
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from raw Direct name match 110 gUSDA reference amount 318 kcal 289 21.3 g 0.2 g 461 mg FDC 2706065 ↗
Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant Direct name match 110 gUSDA reference amount 355 kcal 323 19.6 g 0.3 g 927 mg FDC 2706068 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

Every selected record uses a 110-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 318 calories for “from raw” to 355 for “from restaurant.” At a fixed 100 grams, “from raw” is 289 calories and “from restaurant” is 323—a fixed-weight separation of 34 calories. For Chicken wing fried coated, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “fried, coated, from fast food”, “fried, coated, from pre-cooked”, “fried, coated, from raw”, and “fried, coated, from restaurant”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes breading or batter as ingredient in food, salt, table, and vegetable oil, nfs; differentiating rows include chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat and skin, cooked, roasted and fast foods, fried chicken, wing, meat and skin and breading. On this Chicken wing fried coated page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Chicken wing fried coated” cannot resolve the differences between Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food and Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    A shared source weight

    Every selected record uses 110 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “fried, coated, from fast food”, “fried, coated, from pre-cooked”, “fried, coated, from raw”, and “fried, coated, from restaurant”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include breading or batter as ingredient in food and salt, table; rows that vary across the set include chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat and skin, cooked, roasted and fast foods, fried chicken, wing, meat and skin and breading. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Chicken wing fried coated unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that chicken wing fried coated is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“fried, coated, from fast food”, “fried, coated, from pre-cooked”, “fried, coated, from raw”, and “fried, coated, from restaurant”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Chicken wing fried coated source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 4 exact records behind Chicken wing fried coated source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant is higher in calcium per 100 g

Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant reports 61 mg versus 22 mg for Chicken wing, fried, coated, from pre-cooked: a 39 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

4 listed servings each weigh 110 g

The 4 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 110 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food” from “Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Chicken wing fried coated source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Test a nearby record choice Chicken wing, baked, broiled, or roasted, from raw vs Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food

Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: raw; baked, roasted, or broiled versus fried; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Chicken wing, baked, broiled, or roasted, from raw vs Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant

Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: raw; baked, roasted, or broiled versus fried; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Chicken, broilers or fryers, wing, meat and skin, cooked, roasted

USDA input 5103 appears in 2 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 74–78 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Fast Foods, Fried Chicken, Wing, meat and skin and breading

USDA input 21472 appears in 2 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 78–78 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path 4 context records in this source topic Chicken, whole pieces

Chicken wing, fried, coated, from fast food and Chicken wing, fried, coated, from pre-cooked belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 22 mg in Chicken wing, fried, coated, from pre-cooked to 61 mg in Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, sodium runs from 419 mg in Chicken wing, fried, coated, from raw to 843 mg in Chicken wing, fried, coated, from restaurant, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path