Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Peppers and onions cooked calories per cup: 52–86 across all 2 named USDA examples

Across all 2 named USDA examples, a cup contains 52–86 calories. Their listed weights span 140–145 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 73 g

43calories

Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added

Protein
0.8 g
Carbs
5.9 g
Fat
1.9 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710011 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 2 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 2 exact records in this guide report 26–43 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 37–59 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Peppers and onions cooked, begin by separating “Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added” from “Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 2 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How peppers and onions cooked records compare at 100 grams

All 2 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat 37 kcal
    37 kcal
  2. Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added 59 kcal
    59 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 2 named USDA records in view: 2 direct matches. All sit within “Other vegetables and combinations.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 2 records together under the exact grouping key “peppers and onions.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Peppers and onions cooked, this page can compare 2 named records from FDC 2710011 through FDC 2710010. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

70–73 g before composition

The largest source amount is 1.0× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.

Composition

22 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “no added fat”; the higher is “fat added.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

5 mg sodium gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “no added fat” (118 mg) and “fat added” (123 mg).

Observed source examples

Both records, with their own serving weights intact

The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every peppers and onions cooked.

Important: “Lower” begins with Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat; “higher” ends with Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every peppers and onions cooked meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Peppers and onions cooked, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Peppers and onions cooked nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added Direct name match 73 gUSDA reference amount 43 kcal 59 0.8 g 1.1 g 90 mg FDC 2710011 ↗
Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat Direct name match 70 gUSDA reference amount 26 kcal 37 0.7 g 1.1 g 83 mg FDC 2710010 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

The listed source amounts run from 70 to 73 grams—a 3-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 26 calories for “no added fat” to 43 for “fat added.” At a fixed 100 grams, “no added fat” is 37 calories and “fat added” is 59—a fixed-weight separation of 22 calories. For Peppers and onions cooked, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “cooked, fat added” and “cooked, no added fat”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes green pepper, cooked, as ingredient, onions, cooked, as ingredient, and red pepper, cooked, as ingredient; differentiating rows include oil or table fat, nfs. On this Peppers and onions cooked page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Peppers and onions cooked” cannot resolve the differences between Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added and Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    Source weight before serving calories

    The source amounts span 70–73 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “cooked, fat added” and “cooked, no added fat”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include green pepper, cooked, as ingredient and onions, cooked, as ingredient; rows that vary across the set include oil or table fat, nfs. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Peppers and onions cooked unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that peppers and onions cooked is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“cooked, fat added” and “cooked, no added fat”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Peppers and onions cooked source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Peppers and onions cooked source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added is higher in total fat per 100 g

Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added reports 2.7 g versus 0.1 g for Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat: a 2.5 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat is denser; Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added is higher in its source amount

Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat reports 1.1 g per 100 g and 0.7 g in USDA source amount (70 g). Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added reports a lower 1 g per 100 g but a higher 0.8 g in USDA source amount (73 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added” from “Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Peppers and onions cooked source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

A formulation detail that separates records Oil or table fat, NFS

USDA input 81200100 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 3–3 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic Other vegetables and combinations

Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added and Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path A shared source-formulation input Green pepper, cooked, as ingredient

USDA input 99997520 appears in 2 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 33–33 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710011 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calories runs from 37 kcal in Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat to 59 kcal in Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2710010 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path 2 records share this broad food family Vegetables: broader category context

Peppers and onions, cooked, fat added and Peppers and onions, cooked, no added fat are assigned to Feast’s Vegetables editorial category. Use the category page to compare nearby foods at a broad level; keep the exact USDA descriptions on this page for record-level decisions.

Follow this evidence path