Energy
lower quarter14 kcalthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 36 kcal
- Middle 50%
- 31–52 kcal
Based on 10 records reporting energy.
Vegetablesmoderate variability
Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat calories: 12 per 85 g
This exact USDA record reports 12 calories for 85 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.
Quick facts
USDA reference amount · 85 g
- Calories
- 12 kcal
- Protein
- 1.3 g
- Carbohydrate
- 1.9 g
- Total fat
- 0.2 g
- Fiber
- 0.9 g
- Sodium
- 160 mg
Portion calculator
Estimate your portion
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 85 g
12calories
Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat
- Protein
- 1.3 g
- Carbs
- 1.9 g
- Fat
- 0.2 g
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources
The editorial read
The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity
Portion: the cited record reports about 12 calories for USDA reference amount at 85 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 14 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.
Composition: that source amount also reports 1.3 g protein, 0.9 g fiber, and 160 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.
Identity: the largest listed formulation input is cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw, representing 99.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 2 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.
The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.
The household measures attached to this record span roughly 12–24 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.
Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.
Record-specific decision brief
What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you
This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2709887: “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.
01 · Portion arithmetic
Three weights, one fixed composition
For FDC 2709887, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.
| Scenario | Weight | Energy | Protein | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight | 63.8 g | 9 kcal | 1 g | 0.6 g | 120 mg |
| USDA reference amountExact record reference weight | 85 g | 12 kcal | 1.3 g | 0.9 g | 160 mg |
| 1 cupUSDA-listed household measure | 170 g | 24 kcal | 2.7 g | 1.7 g | 320 mg |
02 · Fixed-weight context
Where 100 grams sits inside Cabbage
The comparison set contains 10 exact records in the Cabbage USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2709887’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.
Protein
upper quarter1.6 gthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 1.3 g
- Middle 50%
- 1–1.5 g
Based on 10 records reporting protein.
Dietary fiber
lower quarter1 gthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 2.3 g
- Middle 50%
- 1.3–2.5 g
Based on 10 records reporting dietary fiber.
Sodium
upper quarter188 mgthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 138 mg
- Middle 50%
- 82–153 mg
Based on 10 records reporting sodium.
03 · FDA label lens
The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals
At FDC 2709887’s 85 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.
Strength-side signals
Vitamin C34 mg
≈ 37% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Vitamin A187 µg
≈ 21% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Tradeoff-side signals
Sodium160 mg
≈ 7% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Saturated fat0 g
≈ 0% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
04 · Highest-impact checks
The three levers most worth resolving first
For “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709888 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.
- 01
Portion sensitivity around 85 g
A 25% weight move in either direction spans 63.8–106.3 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 9 kcal and 15 kcal.
- 02
Record choice: compare with FDC 2709888
At an equal 100 g, this record has 2.6 g less total fat than “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, fat added.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.
- 03
Formulation anchor: Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw
The source formulation has 2 input rows; Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw supplies 99.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.
05 · Exact-record choice
Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name
Keep this record when “Chinese; cooked; no added fat” fits. Inspect FDC 2709888 when “Chinese; cooked; fat added” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.
Keep this profile when these fields fit
Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat
- Exact source wording
- “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat”
- Source identity
- USDA FDC 2709887 · FNDDS 75210010
- Named qualifiers
- Chinese · cooked · no added fat
Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better
Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, fat added
- Exact source wording
- “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, fat added”
- Source identity
- USDA FDC 2709888 · FNDDS 75210020
- Named qualifiers
- Chinese · cooked · fat added
- Source inputs unique in this pair
- Oil or table fat, NFS
Choose the closest description
Which USDA record fits your meal?
Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “Chinese”, “cooked”, and “no added fat”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.
On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact record | Source serving | Calories / 100 g | Protein / 100 g | Fat / 100 g | Fiber / 100 g | Sodium / 100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This recordCabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat | 85 g12 kcal | 14 kcal | 1.6 g | 0.2 g | 1 g | 188 mg |
| Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, fat added | 88 g33 kcal | 37 kcal | 1.5 g | 2.9 g | 1 g | 192 mg |
| Cabbage, green, cooked, no added fat | 75 g24 kcal | 32 kcal | 1 g | 0.2 g | 2.6 g | 137 mg |
| Cabbage, Chinese, raw | 45 g6 kcal | 13 kcal | 1.5 g | 0.2 g | 1 g | 65 mg |
| Cabbage, savoy, cooked | 78 g40 kcal | 51 kcal | 2 g | 2.8 g | 3.1 g | 154 mg |
| Cabbage, red, cooked | 78 g45 kcal | 58 kcal | 1.3 g | 2.9 g | 2.1 g | 138 mg |
| Cabbage, green, raw | 45 g14 kcal | 31 kcal | 1 g | 0.2 g | 2.5 g | 16 mg |
How to compare FDC 2709887: its source amount is 85 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.
Household measures
Compare listed portions
For FDC 2709887, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.
1 cup
24 kcal
170 g
At a glance
Nutrient signals in the source amount
For FDC 2709887, Vitamin C is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.
Vitamin C
33.7 mg≈ 38% Daily ValueVitamin A
187 µg≈ 21% Daily ValueCalcium
92.7 mg≈ 7% Daily ValueThe percentages above apply to FDC 2709887’s 85 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗
Nutrition facts
Compare the source serving with 100 grams
Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 85 g.
| Nutrient | Amount | Approx. % Daily Value |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 12 kcal 14 kcal | Not established Not established |
| Protein | 1.3 g 1.6 g | Not shown Not shown |
| Carbohydrate | 1.9 g 2.3 g | 1% 1% |
| Total fat | 0.2 g 0.2 g | 0% 0% |
| Dietary fiber | 0.9 g 1 g | 3% 4% |
| Sugars | 1 g 1.2 g | Not established Not established |
| Sodium | 159.8 mg 188 mg | 7% 8% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g 0 g | 0% 0% |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0 g 0 g | Not established Not established |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 0.1 g 0.1 g | Not established Not established |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg 0 mg | 0% 0% |
| Potassium | 222.7 mg 262 mg | 5% 6% |
| Calcium | 92.7 mg 109 mg | 7% 8% |
| Iron | 0.7 mg 0.8 mg | 4% 5% |
| Magnesium | 17 mg 20 mg | 4% 5% |
| Vitamin C | 33.7 mg 39.7 mg | 37% 44% |
| Vitamin D | 0 µg 0 µg | 0% 0% |
| Vitamin A | 187 µg 220 µg | 21% 24% |
| Caffeine | 0 mg 0 mg | Not established Not established |
| Alcohol | 0 g 0 g | Not established Not established |
| Water | 80.6 g 94.8 g | Not established Not established |
For FDC 2709887, approximate percentages divide the displayed 85 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.
Inside the source record
Source formulation behind this USDA record
USDA links FDC 2709887 to 2 source inputs totaling 100.3 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat” inspectable beside similarly named records.
How to read this
2 listed components
The largest listed inputs by source weight are Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.
100.3 g total listed input weight across the formulation.
| # | USDA input | Listed amount | Input weight | Share of listed input weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), rawUSDA ingredient 11116 · encyclopedia page available | 100 GM | 100 g | 99.7% |
| 2 | Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available | 0.3 GM | 0.3 g | 0.3% |
Exact-record context
What makes this USDA record distinct?
For FDC 2709887, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Cabbage” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.
This record
Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat
- USDA category
- Cabbage
- FDC ID
- 2709887
- FNDDS code
- 75210010
Closest inspectable record
Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, fat added
- USDA category
- Cabbage
- FDC ID
- 2709888
- FNDDS code
- 75210020
| Nutrient | This record | Comparison record | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 14 kcal | 37 kcal | −23 kcal |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.5 g | +0 g |
| Carbohydrate | 2.3 g | 2.2 g | +0.1 g |
| Total fat | 0.2 g | 2.9 g | −2.6 g |
| Dietary fiber | 1 g | 1 g | Same listed value |
| Sodium | 188 mg | 192 mg | −4 mg |
Plain-English read
At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 23 less calories and 2.6 g less total fat than “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, fat added.”
Only the comparison record lists Oil or table fat, NFS. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.
2 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.
Formulation evidence
The listed formulations differ
The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.
Shared listed inputs: Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw; Salt, table.
Listed only in the comparison: Oil or table fat, NFS.
Portion evidence
The listed portion sets differ
This record’s reference amount is 85 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (170 g).
The comparison record’s reference amount is 88 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (175 g).
Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2709887 with FDC 2709888 at equal mass; use their 85 g and 88 g source amounts only for portion matching.
Evidence boundary: FDC 2709887 versus FDC 2709888 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.
Review the full cabbage source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →
Deep comparisons
Controlled comparisons that include this exact record
FDC 2709887 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.
2 material nutrient differencesCabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat vs Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, fat addedInspect descriptions, portions, formulations, and both sources →1 material nutrient differenceCabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat vs Cabbage, Chinese, rawInspect descriptions, portions, formulations, and both sources →
From record to familiar meal
Guides that use this exact USDA record
These 2 guides place “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat” beside explicitly linked source records; use them to compare preparations without turning FDC 2709887 into a universal recipe.
Uncertainty, made actionable
What can change this estimate?
This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, raw versus cooked weight, cooking method, added fat or sauce.
For “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.
- 01
portion size
When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.
- 02
raw versus cooked weight
Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.
- 03
cooking method
Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.
- 04
added fat or sauce
Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.
How we estimated this
The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point
FDC 2709887 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 14 kcal per 100 g becomes 12 kcal at 85 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.
About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.
Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024
FoodData Central ID: 2709887
FNDDS food code: 75210010
The scaling for FDC 2709887 can be exact while the match to “Cabbage, Chinese, cooked, no added fat” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 85 g weight, 2-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.
Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.