Typical listed-weight range
7.1%–30.5%
The middle half of linked records spans 23.4 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Within Feast’s 3,850-record USDA FNDDS reference corpus, “Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts” appears as a formulation input in 4 finished-food records. Their calories and nutrients describe those complete foods, not the input label by itself. Use the catalog to choose the closest finished food and open its exact FoodData Central citation.
Browse all 4 linked food records →This page helps you find complete foods that include Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts in USDA’s nutrition data. Choose the record that most closely matches what you ate; Feast does not turn a collection average into a standalone ingredient estimate.
What the code means
Every occurrence collected here uses ingredient code 12120 and the source description “Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts.” The code is preserved exactly as it appears in the FNDDS input-food rows. It is not a FoodData Central FDC ID, so this page does not invent a standalone ingredient-record URL.
The strongest concentrations of linked records are currently Nuts and seeds (4). These are category counts within Feast’s selected 3,850-record corpus. They do not estimate how often the ingredient is eaten, how common it is in recipes generally, or its prevalence across every FNDDS release.
Collection-level interpretation
These summaries describe the linked FNDDS records in this exact corpus. They do not estimate consumer frequency, market share, or the composition of a meal. This is a very small set of 4 records: each observation can move the percentages, buckets, and interpolated quartiles substantially, so read the complete catalog rather than treating the summaries as stable population estimates.
Typical listed-weight range
The middle half of linked records spans 23.4 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Largest linked category
4 of 4 linked records (100%) sit in this USDA category. The remainder span 0 other categories.
Most populated share band
3 records (75%) fall in this band after repeated rows for code 12120 are combined within each food.
Most frequent eligible co-input
It appears alongside code 12120 in 3 linked records (75%). Co-occurrence describes database structure, not a required recipe.
Where USDA uses this input
Each record is counted once even if ingredient code 12120 appears on more than one input row inside that formulation. The category grouping describes the complete linked foods, not a culinary rule about the ingredient.
Mixed nuts, unroasted; Mixed nuts, without peanuts, unsalted; Mixed nuts, without peanuts, salted
Important nutrition boundary
No unique exact food-code match or reviewed sole-source bridge qualifies for a direct consumer answer. Feast therefore does not treat the collection median, minimum, maximum, or an arbitrary similar record as the nutrition of this input.
The table below describes the complete linked foods per 100 grams. Use it to find a closer finished-food record, not to infer what this formulation input supplies on its own.
Compare complete food records
Every value in this table describes an entire USDA survey-food record per 100 grams. The values are not the nutrient content of ingredient code 12120, and differences cannot be attributed to this one input.
| Whole-record nutrient | Observed minimum | Middle 50% | Median | Observed maximum | Linked records |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caloriesper 100 g of the complete food | 616 kcal | 619–626 kcal | 623 kcal | 628 kcal | 4 |
| Proteinper 100 g of the complete food | 15 g | 16–16.5 g | 16.4 g | 17 g | 4 |
| Carbohydrateper 100 g of the complete food | 16.7 g | 20.7–22.4 g | 22.1 g | 22.9 g | 4 |
| Total fatper 100 g of the complete food | 54.6 g | 55.3–57.2 g | 55.8 g | 60.8 g | 4 |
| Dietary fiberper 100 g of the complete food | 6.9 g | 7–7.8 g | 7.1 g | 9.7 g | 4 |
| Sodiumper 100 g of the complete food | 0 mg | 5–85 mg | 7 mg | 320 mg | 4 |
The minimum and maximum preserve the complete observed span. The median is the middle linked-record value, not a prediction for a meal and not an ingredient-specific nutrient estimate.
Complete linked catalog
This is the complete qualifying-corpus catalog, not a hand-picked sample. Search by food name or USDA category, then open a profile for household portions, Feast’s 21-nutrient panel, formulation details, and its exact FDC citation.
4 records shown
| Linked USDA food record | USDA category | Formulation | Listed input weight | Weight share | Calories | Protein | Sodium | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazelnuts | Nuts and seeds | Sole source | 100 g | 100% | 628 kcal | 15 g | 0 mg | FDC 2707502 ↗ |
| Mixed nuts, unroasted | Nuts and seeds | 7 input rows | 7 g | 7.4% | 616 kcal | 17 g | 7 mg | FDC 2707505 ↗ |
| Mixed nuts, without peanuts, salted | Nuts and seeds | 9 input rows | 7 g | 7.1% | 620 kcal | 16.3 g | 320 mg | FDC 2707509 ↗ |
| Mixed nuts, without peanuts, unsalted | Nuts and seeds | 8 input rows | 7 g | 7.1% | 625 kcal | 16.4 g | 6 mg | FDC 2707510 ↗ |
No linked record matches that filter. Clear the search to restore the complete catalog.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 4 exact records behind Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts (USDA input 12120). Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Mixed nuts, without peanuts, salted reports 320 mg versus 0 mg for Hazelnuts: a 320 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThese listed servings have equal weights
The 4 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 28 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.
Record identity is part of the estimate
These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts (USDA input 12120), each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Mixed nuts, unroasted and Mixed nuts, without peanuts, salted are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Nuts, brazilnuts, dried, unblanchedUSDA input 12078 appears in 3 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 7–7 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Nuts, cashew nuts, dry roasted, without salt addedUSDA input 12085 appears in 3 of 4 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 30–30 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path 4 context records in this source topic Nuts and seedsMixed nuts, unroasted and Hazelnuts belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Mixed nuts, with peanuts, lightly salted vs Mixed nuts, without peanuts, unsaltedMixed nuts, without peanuts, unsalted is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Sodium wording: salted versus unsalted; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Mixed nuts, with peanuts, salted vs Mixed nuts, without peanuts, unsaltedMixed nuts, without peanuts, unsalted is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Sodium wording: salted versus unsalted; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, sodium runs from 0 mg in Hazelnuts to 320 mg in Mixed nuts, without peanuts, salted, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence pathMethod and provenance
Feast begins with its pinned 3,850-record USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods reference corpus for FNDDS 2021–2023. Each exact food profile retains its FDC identifier, source-food description, nutrient values, household measures, and positive-weight input-food rows. This page groups those input rows by the exact ingredient code 12120; it does not merge similar-looking ingredient names or infer synonyms.
The distinct-record count deduplicates by FDC food record. When the same code is listed more than once inside one source formulation, its input weights are added before the listed-weight share is calculated. Category counts also count each food once. The 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile use the sorted one-share-per-food values with linear interpolation between adjacent ranks when a percentile falls between two records.
USDA’s current FNDDS documentation explains that many nutrient profiles are generated with calculation recipes designed to represent multiple variants, and that their input codes are not necessarily the exact ingredients in a retail product or an ingredient declaration. It also documents moisture and nutrient-retention adjustments. Feast therefore treats these rows as transparent source-calculation evidence—not as a reverse-engineered recipe.
The complete-food nutrient table uses each linked record’s available published per-100-gram values so the denominator remains consistent; its middle-50% ranges use the same interpolated percentile method. It is presented for record selection and comparison only. No nutrient value is reassigned to the ingredient, no causal effect is inferred, and no “healthy” score is manufactured from the collection.
Use the ingredient as a discovery clue. Compare the linked record names, food categories, preparation wording, source formulation, and portion measures. If a close record exists, its complete profile can provide a defensible reference estimate. If the meal differs materially in cooking fat, sauce, ingredient ratios, or portion size, keep looking or use recipe weights, a package label, or an editable photo estimate instead.
These pages are educational source indexes. They do not provide medical advice, personalized nutrient targets, food-safety guidance, or a recipe. If a clinician has given you individualized dietary instructions, follow that guidance and use the most specific current source available for the food you actually consumed.