Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Coffee, Cafe Mocha calories per cup (8 fl oz): 124–159 across all 6 named USDA examples

Across all 6 named USDA examples, a cup (8 fl oz) contains 124–159 calories. Each included example lists 248 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 small · 372 g

238calories

Coffee, Cafe Mocha

Protein
9.5 g
Carbs
37.9 g
Fat
5.5 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2710410 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 6 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 6 exact records in this guide report 186–238 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 50–64 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Coffee, Cafe Mocha, begin by separating “Coffee, Cafe Mocha” from “Coffee, Cafe Mocha, with non-dairy milk.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 6 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How coffee, cafe mocha records compare at 100 grams

Five rank landmarks are shown from all 6 cited records: minimum, 25th-ranked, median-ranked, 75th-ranked, and maximum. Weight is held at 100 grams; source-serving weights are listed in the table.

  1. 50 kcal
  2. 50 kcal
  3. 52 kcal
  4. 52 kcal
  5. 64 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 6 named USDA records in view: 6 direct matches. All sit within “Coffee.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first two description segments” placed these 6 records together under the exact grouping key “coffee cafe mocha.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Coffee, Cafe Mocha, this page can compare 6 named records from FDC 2710410 through FDC 2710412. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

A shared 372 g comparison anchor

Equal source weights make the selected Coffee, Cafe Mocha serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.

Composition

14 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk”; the higher is “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

1.7 g protein gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk” (0.9 g) and “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, nonfat” (2.6 g).

Observed source examples

Three landmarks inside this source set—not universal endpoints

These 6 records each use a 372 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every coffee, cafe mocha; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.

Important: “Lower” begins with Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk; “higher” ends with Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every coffee, cafe mocha meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Coffee, Cafe Mocha, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Coffee, Cafe Mocha nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Coffee, Cafe Mocha Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 238 kcal 64 9.5 g 0 g 171 mg FDC 2710410 ↗
Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 238 kcal 64 9.5 g 0 g 171 mg FDC 2710413 ↗
Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, nonfat Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 193 kcal 52 9.7 g 0 g 175 mg FDC 2710414 ↗
Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 186 kcal 50 3.3 g 0.4 g 201 mg FDC 2710415 ↗
Coffee, Cafe Mocha, nonfat Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 193 kcal 52 9.7 g 0 g 175 mg FDC 2710411 ↗
Coffee, Cafe Mocha, with non-dairy milk Direct name match 372 gUSDA reference amount 186 kcal 50 3.3 g 0.4 g 201 mg FDC 2710412 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

Every selected record uses a 372-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 186 calories for “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk” to 238 for “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated.” At a fixed 100 grams, “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk” is 50 calories and “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated” is 64—a fixed-weight separation of 14 calories. For Coffee, Cafe Mocha, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “Cafe Mocha”, “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated”, “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk”, “Cafe Mocha, nonfat”, and “Cafe Mocha, with non-dairy milk”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes syrup, nestle, chocolate; differentiating rows include beverages, coffee, brewed, espresso, restaurant-prepared, decaffeinated, beverages, coffee, brewed, espresso, restaurant-prepared, milk, nonfat, fluid, with added vitamin a and vitamin d (fat free or skim), and milk, reduced fat, fluid, 2% milkfat, with added vitamin a and vitamin d. On this Coffee, Cafe Mocha page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Coffee, Cafe Mocha” cannot resolve the differences between Coffee, Cafe Mocha and Coffee, Cafe Mocha, with non-dairy milk. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    A shared source weight

    Every selected record uses 372 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “Cafe Mocha”, “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated”, “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk”, “Cafe Mocha, nonfat”, and “Cafe Mocha, with non-dairy milk”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include syrup, nestle, chocolate; rows that vary across the set include beverages, coffee, brewed, espresso, restaurant-prepared, decaffeinated, beverages, coffee, brewed, espresso, restaurant-prepared, and milk, nonfat, fluid, with added vitamin a and vitamin d (fat free or skim). Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Coffee, Cafe Mocha” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Coffee, Cafe Mocha unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that coffee, cafe mocha is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“Cafe Mocha”, “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, nonfat”, “Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk”, and “Cafe Mocha, with non-dairy milk”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Coffee, Cafe Mocha source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 6 exact records behind Coffee, Cafe Mocha source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated is higher in total fat per 100 g

Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated reports 1.5 g versus 0.1 g for Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, nonfat: a 1.4 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

6 listed servings each weigh 372 g

The 6 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 372 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Coffee, Cafe Mocha” from “Coffee, Cafe Mocha, with non-dairy milk”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Coffee, Cafe Mocha source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

6 context records in this source topic Coffee

Coffee, Cafe Mocha and Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, coffee, brewed, espresso, restaurant-prepared, decaffeinated

USDA input 14202 appears in 3 of 6 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 60–60 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Beverages, coffee, brewed, espresso, restaurant-prepared

USDA input 14210 appears in 2 of 6 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 62–62 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated vs Coffee, Iced Cafe Mocha, nonfat

Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Fat-level wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus nonfat or fat-free wording; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
Test a nearby record choice Coffee, Cafe Mocha vs Coffee, Iced Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, nonfat

Coffee, Cafe Mocha is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Fat-level wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus nonfat or fat-free wording; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Protein: density and serving context

In this page’s records, protein runs from 0.9 g in Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk to 2.6 g in Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, nonfat, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Potassium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, potassium runs from 68 mg in Coffee, Cafe Mocha, decaffeinated, with non-dairy milk to 155 mg in Coffee, Cafe Mocha, nonfat, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path