Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Double hamburger calories per double hamburger: 513–520 across all 2 named USDA examples

Across all 2 named USDA examples, a double hamburger contains 513–520 calories. Each included example lists 180 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 double hamburger · 180 g

513calories

Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties

Protein
35.3 g
Carbs
23.2 g
Fat
30.1 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706937 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 2 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 2 exact records in this guide report 513–520 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 285–289 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Double hamburger, begin by separating “Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties” from “Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing all 2 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How double hamburger records compare at 100 grams

All 2 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.

  1. Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties 285 kcal
    285 kcal
  2. Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties 289 kcal
    289 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 2 named USDA records in view: 2 direct matches. All sit within “Burgers.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 2 records together under the exact grouping key “double hamburger.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Double hamburger, this page can compare 2 named records from FDC 2706937 through FDC 2706936. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

A shared 180 g comparison anchor

Equal source weights make the selected Double hamburger serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.

Composition

4 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “on wheat bun”; the higher is “on white bun.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

1.0 g fiber gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “on white bun” (0.5 g) and “on wheat bun” (1.5 g).

Observed source examples

Both records, with their own serving weights intact

These 2 records each use a 180 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every double hamburger; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.

Important: “Lower” begins with Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties; “higher” ends with Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every double hamburger meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Double hamburger, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Double hamburger nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties Direct name match 180 gUSDA reference amount 513 kcal 285 35.3 g 2.7 g 590 mg FDC 2706937 ↗
Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties Direct name match 180 gUSDA reference amount 520 kcal 289 34.6 g 0.9 g 619 mg FDC 2706936 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

Every selected record uses a 180-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 513 calories for “on wheat bun” to 520 for “on white bun.” At a fixed 100 grams, “on wheat bun” is 285 calories and “on white bun” is 289—a fixed-weight separation of 4 calories. For Double hamburger, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “on wheat bun, 2 small patties” and “on white bun, 2 small patties”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes beef, ground, patties, frozen, cooked, broiled and salt, table; differentiating rows include rolls, hamburger or hotdog, plain and wheat bun as ingredient in sandwiches. On this Double hamburger page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Double hamburger” cannot resolve the differences between Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties and Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    A shared source weight

    Every selected record uses 180 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “on wheat bun, 2 small patties” and “on white bun, 2 small patties”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include beef, ground, patties, frozen, cooked, broiled and salt, table; rows that vary across the set include rolls, hamburger or hotdog, plain and wheat bun as ingredient in sandwiches. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Double hamburger unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that double hamburger is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“on wheat bun, 2 small patties” and “on white bun, 2 small patties”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Double hamburger source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Double hamburger source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties is higher in dietary fiber per 100 g

Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties reports 1.5 g versus 0.5 g for Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties: a 1 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

These listed servings have equal weights

2 listed servings each weigh 180 g

The 2 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 180 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.

Choose the record before reading the number

Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties and Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties are not interchangeable

The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes the exact source description the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Double hamburger source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Compare two records on this page Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties vs Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties

Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Dietary fiber: 1.5 versus 0.5 g per 100 g; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Rolls, hamburger or hotdog, plain

USDA input 18350 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 52–52 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Wheat bun as ingredient in sandwiches

USDA input 99995135 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 52–52 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path 2 context records in this source topic Burgers

Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties and Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Dietary fiber: density and serving context

In this page’s records, dietary fiber runs from 0.5 g in Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties to 1.5 g in Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Double hamburger, on wheat bun, 2 small patties

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2706937 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Double hamburger, on white bun, 2 small patties

Open the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2706936 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.

Follow this evidence path