Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe
- Source serving
- 308 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 123 kcal
- Protein
- 14.8 g
Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition
Across all 3 named USDA examples, a cup contains 308–440 calories. Each included example lists 250 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 1 cup · 250 g
308calories
Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2708841 Full nutrition profile →
The 3 exact records in this guide report 308–440 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 123–176 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Match my meal
For Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables, begin by separating “Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe” from “Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Showing all 3 linked records.
Equal-weight view
All 3 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.
Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories
What this page compares
This guide keeps 3 named USDA records in view: 3 direct matches. All sit within “Pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheese.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first two description segments” placed these 3 records together under the exact grouping key “pasta with tomato based sauce meat.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.
For Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables, this page can compare 3 named records from FDC 2708841 through FDC 2708840. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →
Editor’s decision brief
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
Equal source weights make the selected Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.
Composition
The lower endpoint is “home recipe”; the higher is “restaurant.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “home recipe” (161 mg) and “restaurant” (348 mg).
Observed source examples
These 3 records each use a 250 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.
308kcal
250 g source amount · 123 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record343kcal
250 g source amount · 137 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record440kcal
250 g source amount · 176 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower” begins with Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe; “higher” ends with Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables meal.
Full comparison
For Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 308 kcal | 123 | 14.8 g | 4 g | 403 mg | FDC 2708841 ↗ |
| Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, ready-to-heat | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 343 kcal | 137 | 14.5 g | 4 g | 743 mg | FDC 2708842 ↗ |
| Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 440 kcal | 176 | 13.7 g | 3.8 g | 870 mg | FDC 2708840 ↗ |
Portion analysis
Every selected record uses a 250-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 308 calories for “home recipe” to 440 for “restaurant.” At a fixed 100 grams, “home recipe” is 123 calories and “restaurant” is 176—a fixed-weight separation of 53 calories. For Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “meat, and added vegetables, home recipe”, “meat, and added vegetables, ready-to-heat”, and “meat, and added vegetables, restaurant”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt and spaghetti sauce with meat and added vegetables; differentiating rows include salt, table and vegetable oil, nfs. On this Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
The family label “Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables” cannot resolve the differences between Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe and Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
Every selected record uses 250 grams. Inside this set, serving-calorie differences therefore reflect the published composition rather than a change in source weight.
Representative record-level distinctions include “meat, and added vegetables, home recipe”, “meat, and added vegetables, ready-to-heat”, and “meat, and added vegetables, restaurant”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.
Shared source rows include pasta, cooked, enriched, without added salt and spaghetti sauce with meat and added vegetables; rows that vary across the set include salt, table and vegetable oil, nfs. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.
Even “Pasta with tomato-based sauce, …, home recipe” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.
Record matching
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“meat, and added vegetables, home recipe”, “meat, and added vegetables, ready-to-heat”, and “meat, and added vegetables, restaurant”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 3 exact records behind Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant reports 9.2 g versus 2.5 g for Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe: a 6.7 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThese listed servings have equal weights
The 3 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 250 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.
Record identity is part of the estimate
These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Pasta with tomato based sauce meat and added vegetables source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Source context: home recipe versus restaurant or fast food; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant vs Pasta, whole grain, with tomato-based sauce and added vegetables, home recipePasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Source context: restaurant or fast food versus home recipe; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Salt, tableUSDA input 2047 appears in 2 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 1–1.5 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Vegetable oil, NFSUSDA input 82101000 appears in 2 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 5–20 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path 3 context records in this source topic Pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheesePasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe and Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, ready-to-heat belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Sodium: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, sodium runs from 161 mg in Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipe to 348 mg in Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, restaurant, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Pasta with tomato-based sauce, meat, and added vegetables, home recipeOpen the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2708841 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.
Follow this evidence path