Pudding, bread
- Source serving
- 156 kcal
- Per 100 g
- 156 kcal
- Protein
- 5.6 g
Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition
Across all 2 named USDA examples, a cup contains 281–312 calories. Their listed weights span 200–260 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 100 g
156calories
Pudding, bread
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2705680 Full nutrition profile →
The 2 exact records in this guide report 140–156 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 108–156 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.
Match my meal
For Pudding, begin by separating “Pudding, bread” from “Pudding, rice.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Showing all 2 linked records.
Equal-weight view
All 2 cited records are shown at the same 100-gram weight. The source servings may differ.
Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories
What this page compares
This guide keeps 2 named USDA records in view: 2 direct matches. All sit within “Pudding.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first description segment” placed these 2 records together under the exact grouping key “pudding.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.
For Pudding, this page can compare 2 named records from FDC 2705680 through FDC 2705685. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →
Editor’s decision brief
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
The largest source amount is 1.3× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.
Composition
The lower endpoint is “rice”; the higher is “bread.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “rice” (3.2 g) and “bread” (5.6 g).
Observed source examples
The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every pudding.
140kcal
130 g source amount · 108 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record156kcal
100 g source amount · 156 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower” begins with Pudding, rice; “higher” ends with Pudding, bread, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every pudding meal.
Full comparison
For Pudding, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pudding, bread | Direct name match | 100 gUSDA reference amount | 156 kcal | 156 | 5.6 g | 1 g | 206 mg | FDC 2705680 ↗ |
| Pudding, rice | Direct name match | 130 gUSDA reference amount | 140 kcal | 108 | 4.2 g | 0.4 g | 126 mg | FDC 2705685 ↗ |
Portion analysis
The listed source amounts run from 100 to 130 grams—a 30-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 140 calories for “rice” to 156 for “bread.” At a fixed 100 grams, “rice” is 108 calories and “bread” is 156—a fixed-weight separation of 48 calories. For Pudding, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “bread” and “rice”. The source formulations contain 11 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include bread, white, commercially prepared, eggs, grade a, large, egg whole, margarine, stick, and milk, nfs. On this Pudding page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
The family label “Pudding” cannot resolve the differences between Pudding, bread and Pudding, rice. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
The source amounts span 100–130 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.
Representative record-level distinctions include “bread” and “rice”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.
11 source-input codes appear across the selected records. Their presence and listed weights describe USDA formulations, not finished plated proportions.
Even “Pudding, bread” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Pudding unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.
Record matching
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that pudding is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“bread” and “rice”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 2 exact records behind Pudding source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Pudding, bread reports 1.1 µg versus 0 µg for Pudding, rice: a 1.1 µg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceCheck the weight before comparing serving totals
Pudding, bread uses USDA source amount (100 g), while Pudding, rice uses USDA source amount (130 g). Use per 100 g for equal-weight composition; use the serving column only when those named source amounts answer your question.
Record identity is part of the estimate
These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Pudding source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
USDA input 18069 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 112–112 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Eggs, Grade A, Large, egg wholeUSDA input 1123 appears in 1 of 2 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 100–100 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Vitamin D: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, vitamin D runs from 0 µg in Pudding, rice to 1.1 µg in Pudding, bread, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, iron runs from 0.1 mg in Pudding, rice to 1 mg in Pudding, bread, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Pudding, breadOpen the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2705680 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.
Follow this evidence path Check another exact record Pudding, riceOpen the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2705685 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.
Follow this evidence path 2 records share this broad food family Snacks & desserts: broader category contextPudding, bread and Pudding, rice are assigned to Feast’s Snacks & desserts editorial category. Use the category page to compare nearby foods at a broad level; keep the exact USDA descriptions on this page for record-level decisions.
Follow this evidence path