Meat & poultrymoderate variability

Beef, ground, patty calories: 231 per 1 medium patty (85 g)

This exact USDA record reports 231 calories for 1 medium patty (85 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 medium patty · 85 g

Calories
231 kcal
Protein
21.6 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
Total fat
15.5 g
Fiber
0 g
Sodium
326 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 medium patty · 85 g

231calories

Beef, ground, patty

Protein
21.6 g
Carbs
0 g
Fat
15.5 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2705855

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 231 calories for 1 medium patty at 85 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 272 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 21.6 g protein, 0 g fiber, and 326 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, broiled, representing 49.6% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 medium patty at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 46–340 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2705855: “Beef, ground, patty.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2705855, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 cubic inch” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 cubic inchUSDA-listed household measure 17 g 46 kcal 4.3 g 0 g 65 mg
1 medium pattyUSDA-listed household measure 85 g 231 kcal 21.6 g 0 g 326 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 125 g 340 kcal 31.8 g 0 g 479 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat & poultry

The comparison set contains 392 exact records in Feast’s broader Meat & poultry category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2705855’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

272 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
192 kcal
Middle 50%
146–247 kcal

Based on 392 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

25.4 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
19.8 g
Middle 50%
12.2–25.2 g

Based on 392 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

0 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0 g
Middle 50%
0–0.7 g

Based on 392 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

383 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
405 mg
Middle 50%
352–528 mg

Based on 392 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2705855’s 85 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron2 mg

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Potassium250 mg

≈ 5% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat5.9 g

≈ 30% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium326 mg

≈ 14% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Beef, ground, patty,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2705854 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 cubic inch to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 17 g and 125 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 46 kcal to 340 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2705854

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1.4 g more total fat than “Beef, ground.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, broiled

    The source formulation has 3 input rows; Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, broiled supplies 49.6% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “ground; patty” fits. Inspect FDC 2705854 when “ground” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Beef, ground, patty

Exact source wording
“Beef, ground, patty”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705855 · FNDDS 21500310
Named qualifiers
ground · patty

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beef, ground

Exact source wording
“Beef, ground”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705854 · FNDDS 21500100
Named qualifiers
ground
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, patty, cooked, broiled · Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, patty, cooked, broiled

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “ground” and “patty”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordBeef, ground, patty 85 g231 kcal 272 kcal 25.4 g 18.2 g 0 g 383 mg
Beef, ground 85 g222 kcal 261 kcal 25.6 g 16.8 g 0 g 381 mg
Beef, ground, raw 85 g181 kcal 213 kcal 18.4 g 14.9 g 0 g 373 mg

How to compare FDC 2705855: its source amount is 85 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2705855, the 6 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 miniature patty

82 kcal

30 g

1 small patty

177 kcal

65 g

1 medium patty

231 kcal

85 g

1 quarter lb patty

231 kcal

85 g

1 large patty

326 kcal

120 g

1 patty, NFS

231 kcal

85 g

A source measure below uses USDA shorthand; the full glossary appears with the source formulation.

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2705855, Saturated fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Saturated fat

5.9 g≈ 30% Daily Value

Cholesterol

74 mg≈ 25% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2705855’s 85 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2705855 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 21.6 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2705855 at 85 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 326 mg sodium, about 14% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 85 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 231 kcal Not established
Protein 21.6 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 0 g 0%
Total fat 15.5 g 20%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0%
Sugars 0 g Not established
Sodium 325.6 mg 14%
Saturated fat 5.9 g 30%
Monounsaturated Fat 7 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.4 g Not established
Cholesterol 74 mg 25%
Potassium 249.9 mg 5%
Calcium 23 mg 2%
Iron 2 mg 11%
Magnesium 17 mg 4%
Vitamin C 0 mg 0%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 2.6 µg 0%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 46.9 g Not established

For FDC 2705855, approximate percentages divide the displayed 85 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2705855 to 3 source inputs totaling 100.8 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Beef, ground, patty” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

3 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, broiled, Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, broiled, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100.8 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, broiledUSDA ingredient 23578 · encyclopedia page available 50 GM 50 g 49.6%
2 Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, broiledUSDA ingredient 23573 50 GM 50 g 49.6%
3 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.8 GM 0.8 g 0.8%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2705855, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Ground beef” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories272 kcal261 kcal+11 kcal
Protein25.4 g25.6 g−0.2 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 gSame listed value
Total fat18.2 g16.8 g+1.4 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 gSame listed value
Sodium383 mg381 mg+2 mg

Plain-English read

The six displayed nutrient values are close under a conservative materiality screen. Small differences remain exact source values, not evidence that one food is preferable.

Only the comparison record lists Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, patty, cooked, broiled; Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, patty, cooked, broiled. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Beef, ground, 75% lean meat / 25% fat, patty, cooked, broiled; Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, broiled; Salt, table.

Listed only in the comparison: Beef, ground, 85% lean meat / 15% fat, patty, cooked, broiled; Beef, ground, 90% lean meat / 10% fat, patty, cooked, broiled.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 85 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 medium patty (85 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 85 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (125 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2705855 with FDC 2705854 at equal mass; use their 85 g and 85 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2705855 versus FDC 2705854 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, cut and fat trim, cooking method, breading, marinade, or sauce.

For “Beef, ground, patty,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    cut and fat trim

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    breading, marinade, or sauce

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2705855 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 272 kcal per 100 g becomes 231 kcal at 85 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 medium patty has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2705855

FNDDS food code: 21500310

The scaling for FDC 2705855 can be exact while the match to “Beef, ground, patty” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 85 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.