Vegetablesmoderate variability

Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked calories: 45 per 85 g

This exact USDA record reports 45 calories for 85 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 85 g

Calories
45 kcal
Protein
0.7 g
Carbohydrate
5.8 g
Total fat
2.4 g
Fiber
1 g
Sodium
26 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 85 g

45calories

Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked

Protein
0.7 g
Carbs
5.8 g
Fat
2.4 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709877

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 45 calories for USDA reference amount at 85 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 53 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 0.7 g protein, 1 g fiber, and 26 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquids, representing 97.1% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 2 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 5–90 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2709877: “Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2709877, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 slice” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 sliceUSDA-listed household measure 10 g 5 kcal 0.1 g 0.1 g 3 mg
1 wholeUSDA-listed household measure 25 g 13 kcal 0.2 g 0.3 g 8 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 170 g 90 kcal 1.4 g 2 g 53 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Other vegetables and combinations

The comparison set contains 122 exact records in the Other vegetables and combinations USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2709877’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

53 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
45 kcal
Middle 50%
31–62 kcal

Based on 122 records reporting energy.

Protein

lower quarter

0.8 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.9 g
Middle 50%
1.2–2.8 g

Based on 122 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

lower quarter

1.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
2.3 g
Middle 50%
1.7–3.1 g

Based on 122 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

lower quarter

31 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
135 mg
Middle 50%
102–165 mg

Based on 122 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2709877’s 85 g reference weight, none of the compatible strength-side nutrients evaluated here reaches 5% Daily Value; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

No compatible strength-side nutrient evaluated here reaches 5% DV at this reference weight, so this page does not manufacture a “strength” from a negligible percentage.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat0.6 g

≈ 3% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium26 mg

≈ 1% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709876 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 slice to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 10 g and 170 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 5 kcal to 90 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2709876

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 166 mg less sodium than “Beets, canned, cooked, fat added.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquids

    The source formulation has 2 input rows; Beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquids supplies 97.1% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “canned; reduced sodium; cooked” fits. Inspect FDC 2709876 when “canned; cooked; fat added” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked

Exact source wording
“Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709877 · FNDDS 75208110
Named qualifiers
canned · reduced sodium · cooked
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquids

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beets, canned, cooked, fat added

Exact source wording
“Beets, canned, cooked, fat added”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709876 · FNDDS 75208023
Named qualifiers
canned · cooked · fat added
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beets, canned, drained solids

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “canned”, “reduced sodium”, and “cooked”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordBeets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked 85 g45 kcal 53 kcal 0.8 g 2.8 g 1.2 g 31 mg
Classic mixed vegetables, canned, reduced sodium, cooked with oil 93 g66 kcal 71 kcal 1.9 g 3.6 g 2.3 g 15 mg
Beets, canned, cooked, fat added 88 g47 kcal 53 kcal 0.9 g 2.7 g 1.7 g 197 mg
Classic mixed vegetables, canned, reduced sodium, cooked, no added fat 90 g40 kcal 44 kcal 2 g 0.5 g 2.4 g 15 mg
Classic mixed vegetables, canned, reduced sodium, cooked with butter or margarine 93 g60 kcal 64 kcal 1.9 g 2.8 g 2.3 g 33 mg
Beets, canned, cooked, no added fat 85 g26 kcal 31 kcal 0.9 g 0.1 g 1.8 g 194 mg
Mushrooms, canned, cooked 80 g38 kcal 47 kcal 1.8 g 2.8 g 2.3 g 421 mg

How to compare FDC 2709877: its source amount is 85 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2709877, the 3 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 slice

5 kcal

10 g

1 whole

13 kcal

25 g

1 cup

90 kcal

170 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2709877, Dietary fiber is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Dietary fiber

1 g≈ 4% Daily Value

Magnesium

14.5 mg≈ 3% Daily Value

Iron

0.6 mg≈ 3% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2709877’s 85 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 85 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 45 kcal Not established
Protein 0.7 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 5.8 g 2%
Total fat 2.4 g 3%
Dietary fiber 1 g 4%
Sugars 4.7 g Not established
Sodium 26.4 mg 1%
Saturated fat 0.6 g 3%
Monounsaturated Fat 0.8 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.7 g Not established
Cholesterol 1.7 mg 1%
Potassium 125 mg 3%
Calcium 11.9 mg 1%
Iron 0.6 mg 3%
Magnesium 14.5 mg 3%
Vitamin C 2.2 mg 2%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 11.1 µg 1%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 75.3 g Not established

For FDC 2709877, approximate percentages divide the displayed 85 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2709877 to 2 source inputs totaling 103 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

2 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquids, Oil or table fat, NFS. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

103 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquidsUSDA ingredient 11735 100 GM 100 g 97.1%
2 Oil or table fat, NFSUSDA ingredient 81200100 · encyclopedia page available 3 GM 3 g 2.9%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2709877, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Other vegetables and combinations” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories53 kcal53 kcalSame listed value
Protein0.8 g0.9 g−0.1 g
Carbohydrate6.8 g7 g−0.2 g
Total fat2.8 g2.7 g+0.1 g
Dietary fiber1.2 g1.7 g−0.5 g
Sodium31 mg197 mg−166 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 0.5 g less dietary fiber and 166 mg less sodium than “Beets, canned, cooked, fat added.”

Only this record lists Beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquids. Only the comparison record lists Beets, canned, drained solids. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

2 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Oil or table fat, NFS.

Listed only in this record: Beets, canned, no salt added, solids and liquids.

Listed only in the comparison: Beets, canned, drained solids.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 85 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (170 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 88 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (175 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2709877 with FDC 2709876 at equal mass; use their 85 g and 88 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2709877 versus FDC 2709876 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full other vegetables and combinations source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2709877 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, raw versus cooked weight, cooking method, added fat or sauce.

For “Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    raw versus cooked weight

    Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    added fat or sauce

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2709877 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 53 kcal per 100 g becomes 45 kcal at 85 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2709877

FNDDS food code: 75208110

The scaling for FDC 2709877 can be exact while the match to “Beets, canned, reduced sodium, cooked” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 85 g weight, 2-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.