Vegetablesmoderate variability

Greens with ham or pork calories: 51 per 108 g

This exact USDA record reports 51 calories for 108 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 108 g

Calories
51 kcal
Protein
5.3 g
Carbohydrate
5.1 g
Total fat
1.5 g
Fiber
3.9 g
Sodium
400 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 108 g

51calories

Greens with ham or pork

Protein
5.3 g
Carbs
5.1 g
Fat
1.5 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706759

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 51 calories for USDA reference amount at 108 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 47 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 5.3 g protein, 3.9 g fiber, and 400 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat, representing 86.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 51–68 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706759: “Greens with ham or pork.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706759, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 81 g 38 kcal 4 g 2.9 g 300 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 108 g 51 kcal 5.3 g 3.9 g 400 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 144 g 68 kcal 7.1 g 5.2 g 533 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Other dark green vegetables

The comparison set contains 34 exact records in the Other dark green vegetables USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2706759’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

47 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
46 kcal
Middle 50%
37–57 kcal

Based on 34 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

4.9 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
2.9 g
Middle 50%
2.4–3.1 g

Based on 34 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

3.6 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
3.4 g
Middle 50%
2.7–3.9 g

Based on 34 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

upper quarter

370 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
146 mg
Middle 50%
136–165 mg

Based on 34 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706759’s 108 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin C44 mg

≈ 49% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin A239.8 µg

≈ 27% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium400 mg

≈ 17% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat0.3 g

≈ 1% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Greens with ham or pork,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709571 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 108 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 81–135 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 38 kcal and 63 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2709571

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 2.6 g more protein than “Beet greens, cooked.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat

    The source formulation has 3 input rows; Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat supplies 86.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Greens with ham or pork” fits. Inspect FDC 2709571 when “cooked” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Greens with ham or pork

Exact source wording
“Greens with ham or pork”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706759 · FNDDS 27420080
Source inputs unique in this pair
Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat · Ham, for use with vegetables

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beet greens, cooked

Exact source wording
“Beet greens, cooked”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709571 · FNDDS 72101220
Named qualifiers
cooked
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beet greens, raw · Oil or table fat, NFS

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordGreens with ham or pork 108 g51 kcal 47 kcal 4.9 g 1.4 g 3.6 g 370 mg
Beet greens, cooked 75 g36 kcal 48 kcal 2.3 g 2.9 g 3.9 g 365 mg
Poke greens, cooked 75 g32 kcal 42 kcal 2.2 g 2.9 g 1.5 g 138 mg
Greens, canned, cooked 88 g36 kcal 41 kcal 1.3 g 2.8 g 1.3 g 335 mg
Dandelion greens, cooked 55 g39 kcal 71 kcal 2.8 g 3.5 g 3.6 g 209 mg
Dandelion greens, raw 28 g13 kcal 45 kcal 2.7 g 0.7 g 3.5 g 76 mg
Mustard greens, raw 28 g8 kcal 27 kcal 2.9 g 0.4 g 3.2 g 20 mg

How to compare FDC 2706759: its source amount is 108 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706759, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

68 kcal

144 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706759, Vitamin C is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin C

43.7 mg≈ 49% Daily Value

Vitamin A

239.8 µg≈ 27% Daily Value

Sodium

399.6 mg≈ 17% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706759’s 108 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2706759 at 108 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 3.9 g dietary fiber, about 14% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
  • The representative USDA portion contains 400 mg sodium, about 17% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 108 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 51 kcal Not established
Protein 5.3 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 5.1 g 2%
Total fat 1.5 g 2%
Dietary fiber 3.9 g 14%
Sugars 0.9 g Not established
Sodium 399.6 mg 17%
Saturated fat 0.3 g 1%
Monounsaturated Fat 0.3 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.4 g Not established
Cholesterol 7.6 mg 3%
Potassium 327.2 mg 7%
Calcium 221.4 mg 17%
Iron 1.2 mg 7%
Magnesium 32.4 mg 8%
Vitamin C 43.7 mg 49%
Vitamin D 0.1 µg 1%
Vitamin A 239.8 µg 27%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 93.7 g Not established

For FDC 2706759, approximate percentages divide the displayed 108 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706759 to 3 source inputs totaling 100.2 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Greens with ham or pork” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

3 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat, Ham, for use with vegetables, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100.2 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fatUSDA ingredient 72118211 87 GM 87 g 86.8%
2 Ham, for use with vegetablesUSDA ingredient 89901002 · encyclopedia page available 13 GM 13 g 13%
3 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.2 GM 0.2 g 0.2%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706759, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Other dark green vegetables” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories47 kcal48 kcal−1 kcal
Protein4.9 g2.3 g+2.6 g
Carbohydrate4.7 g4.5 g+0.2 g
Total fat1.4 g2.9 g−1.5 g
Dietary fiber3.6 g3.9 g−0.3 g
Sodium370 mg365 mg+5 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 2.6 g more protein and 1.5 g less total fat than “Beet greens, cooked.”

Only this record lists Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat; Ham, for use with vegetables. Only the comparison record lists Beet greens, raw; Oil or table fat, NFS. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

2 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Salt, table.

Listed only in this record: Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat; Ham, for use with vegetables.

Listed only in the comparison: Beet greens, raw; Oil or table fat, NFS.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 108 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (144 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 75 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (150 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706759 with FDC 2709571 at equal mass; use their 108 g and 75 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706759 versus FDC 2709571 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full other dark green vegetables source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, raw versus cooked weight, cooking method, added fat or sauce.

For “Greens with ham or pork,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    raw versus cooked weight

    Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    added fat or sauce

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706759 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 47 kcal per 100 g becomes 51 kcal at 108 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706759

FNDDS food code: 27420080

The scaling for FDC 2706759 can be exact while the match to “Greens with ham or pork” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 108 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.