Energy
middle half47 kcalthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 46 kcal
- Middle 50%
- 37–57 kcal
Based on 34 records reporting energy.
This exact USDA record reports 51 calories for 108 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.
Quick facts
USDA reference amount · 108 g
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 108 g
51calories
Greens with ham or pork
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
The editorial read
Portion: the cited record reports about 51 calories for USDA reference amount at 108 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 47 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.
Composition: that source amount also reports 5.3 g protein, 3.9 g fiber, and 400 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.
Identity: the largest listed formulation input is greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat, representing 86.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.
The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.
The household measures attached to this record span roughly 51–68 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.
Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.
Record-specific decision brief
This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706759: “Greens with ham or pork.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.
01 · Portion arithmetic
For FDC 2706759, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.
| Scenario | Weight | Energy | Protein | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight | 81 g | 38 kcal | 4 g | 2.9 g | 300 mg |
| USDA reference amountExact record reference weight | 108 g | 51 kcal | 5.3 g | 3.9 g | 400 mg |
| 1 cupUSDA-listed household measure | 144 g | 68 kcal | 7.1 g | 5.2 g | 533 mg |
02 · Fixed-weight context
The comparison set contains 34 exact records in the Other dark green vegetables USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2706759’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.
Energy
middle half47 kcalthis record per 100 g
Based on 34 records reporting energy.
Protein
upper quarter4.9 gthis record per 100 g
Based on 34 records reporting protein.
Dietary fiber
middle half3.6 gthis record per 100 g
Based on 34 records reporting dietary fiber.
Sodium
upper quarter370 mgthis record per 100 g
Based on 34 records reporting sodium.
03 · FDA label lens
At FDC 2706759’s 108 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.
Vitamin C44 mg
≈ 49% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Vitamin A239.8 µg
≈ 27% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Sodium400 mg
≈ 17% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Saturated fat0.3 g
≈ 1% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
04 · Highest-impact checks
For “Greens with ham or pork,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709571 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.
A 25% weight move in either direction spans 81–135 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 38 kcal and 63 kcal.
At an equal 100 g, this record has 2.6 g more protein than “Beet greens, cooked.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.
The source formulation has 3 input rows; Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat supplies 86.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.
05 · Exact-record choice
Keep this record when the exact wording “Greens with ham or pork” fits. Inspect FDC 2709571 when “cooked” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.
Keep this profile when these fields fit
Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better
Choose the closest description
Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.
On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact record | Source serving | Calories / 100 g | Protein / 100 g | Fat / 100 g | Fiber / 100 g | Sodium / 100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This recordGreens with ham or pork | 108 g51 kcal | 47 kcal | 4.9 g | 1.4 g | 3.6 g | 370 mg |
| Beet greens, cooked | 75 g36 kcal | 48 kcal | 2.3 g | 2.9 g | 3.9 g | 365 mg |
| Poke greens, cooked | 75 g32 kcal | 42 kcal | 2.2 g | 2.9 g | 1.5 g | 138 mg |
| Greens, canned, cooked | 88 g36 kcal | 41 kcal | 1.3 g | 2.8 g | 1.3 g | 335 mg |
| Dandelion greens, cooked | 55 g39 kcal | 71 kcal | 2.8 g | 3.5 g | 3.6 g | 209 mg |
| Dandelion greens, raw | 28 g13 kcal | 45 kcal | 2.7 g | 0.7 g | 3.5 g | 76 mg |
| Mustard greens, raw | 28 g8 kcal | 27 kcal | 2.9 g | 0.4 g | 3.2 g | 20 mg |
How to compare FDC 2706759: its source amount is 108 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.
Household measures
For FDC 2706759, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.
68 kcal
144 g
At a glance
For FDC 2706759, Vitamin C is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.
Vitamin C
43.7 mg≈ 49% Daily ValueVitamin A
239.8 µg≈ 27% Daily ValueSodium
399.6 mg≈ 17% Daily ValueThe percentages above apply to FDC 2706759’s 108 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗
Source-serving signals
These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2706759 at 108 g—not a measured or recommended plate.
Nutrition facts
Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 108 g.
| Nutrient | Amount | Approx. % Daily Value |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 51 kcal 47 kcal | Not established Not established |
| Protein | 5.3 g 4.9 g | Not shown Not shown |
| Carbohydrate | 5.1 g 4.7 g | 2% 2% |
| Total fat | 1.5 g 1.4 g | 2% 2% |
| Dietary fiber | 3.9 g 3.6 g | 14% 13% |
| Sugars | 0.9 g 0.8 g | Not established Not established |
| Sodium | 399.6 mg 370 mg | 17% 16% |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g 0.3 g | 1% 1% |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.3 g 0.3 g | Not established Not established |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 0.4 g 0.4 g | Not established Not established |
| Cholesterol | 7.6 mg 7 mg | 3% 2% |
| Potassium | 327.2 mg 303 mg | 7% 6% |
| Calcium | 221.4 mg 205 mg | 17% 16% |
| Iron | 1.2 mg 1.1 mg | 7% 6% |
| Magnesium | 32.4 mg 30 mg | 8% 7% |
| Vitamin C | 43.7 mg 40.5 mg | 49% 45% |
| Vitamin D | 0.1 µg 0.1 µg | 1% 1% |
| Vitamin A | 239.8 µg 222 µg | 27% 25% |
| Caffeine | 0 mg 0 mg | Not established Not established |
| Alcohol | 0 g 0 g | Not established Not established |
| Water | 93.7 g 86.8 g | Not established Not established |
For FDC 2706759, approximate percentages divide the displayed 108 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.
Inside the source record
USDA links FDC 2706759 to 3 source inputs totaling 100.2 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Greens with ham or pork” inspectable beside similarly named records.
How to read this
The largest listed inputs by source weight are Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat, Ham, for use with vegetables, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.
100.2 g total listed input weight across the formulation.
| # | USDA input | Listed amount | Input weight | Share of listed input weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fatUSDA ingredient 72118211 | 87 GM | 87 g | 86.8% |
| 2 | Ham, for use with vegetablesUSDA ingredient 89901002 · encyclopedia page available | 13 GM | 13 g | 13% |
| 3 | Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available | 0.2 GM | 0.2 g | 0.2% |
Exact-record context
For FDC 2706759, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Other dark green vegetables” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.
This record
Closest inspectable record
| Nutrient | This record | Comparison record | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 47 kcal | 48 kcal | −1 kcal |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 2.3 g | +2.6 g |
| Carbohydrate | 4.7 g | 4.5 g | +0.2 g |
| Total fat | 1.4 g | 2.9 g | −1.5 g |
| Dietary fiber | 3.6 g | 3.9 g | −0.3 g |
| Sodium | 370 mg | 365 mg | +5 mg |
Plain-English read
At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 2.6 g more protein and 1.5 g less total fat than “Beet greens, cooked.”
Only this record lists Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat; Ham, for use with vegetables. Only the comparison record lists Beet greens, raw; Oil or table fat, NFS. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.
2 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.
Formulation evidence
The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.
Shared listed inputs: Salt, table.
Listed only in this record: Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat; Ham, for use with vegetables.
Listed only in the comparison: Beet greens, raw; Oil or table fat, NFS.
Portion evidence
This record’s reference amount is 108 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (144 g).
The comparison record’s reference amount is 75 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (150 g).
Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706759 with FDC 2709571 at equal mass; use their 108 g and 75 g source amounts only for portion matching.
Evidence boundary: FDC 2706759 versus FDC 2709571 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.
Review the full other dark green vegetables source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →
Uncertainty, made actionable
This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, raw versus cooked weight, cooking method, added fat or sauce.
For “Greens with ham or pork,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.
When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.
Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.
Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.
Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.
How we estimated this
FDC 2706759 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 47 kcal per 100 g becomes 51 kcal at 108 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.
About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.
Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024
FoodData Central ID: 2706759
FNDDS food code: 27420080
The scaling for FDC 2706759 can be exact while the match to “Greens with ham or pork” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 108 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.
Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.