USDA source topicVegetables

USDA Other dark green vegetables records: median 46 calories per 100 g across 34 foods

Across 34 exact USDA Survey Foods records in this topic, median energy is 46 kcal per 100 grams and the central 80% runs from 28 kcal to 65 kcal. These are collection statistics, not a calorie estimate for a particular meal.

The complete collection preserves all 34 source descriptions, household measures, nutrient distributions, and FoodData Central citations so the summary can be checked against the underlying records.

Distribution at a glance

Where calorie density sits in this USDA record set

Percentiles summarize these 34 cited records; they are not a confidence interval or a prediction for one meal.

  1. 10th percentile 28 kcal
    28 kcal
  2. Median 46 kcal
    46 kcal
  3. 90th percentile 65 kcal
    65 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What is included?

The exact descriptions define the topic.

USDA places these records in the “Other dark green vegetables” survey-food category. Within Feast’s broader navigation, they appear under Vegetables (34 records). The category label is useful for discovery, but it does not mean every record uses the same recipe, brand, cooking method, or portion.

The current collection includes Mustard greens, raw; Dandelion greens, raw; Kale, frozen, cooked, fat added; Turnip greens, frozen, cooked, no added fat; Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine; Beet greens, cooked. Those examples show why the exact wording matters. The complete alphabetical catalog farther down the page preserves all 34 descriptions instead of replacing them with one generic average.

A distribution view of the source set

Median and central nutrient ranges per 100 grams

The central range runs from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the 34 records on this page. It shows the middle of this finite source set without treating its endpoints as typical.

On smaller screens, focus a topic table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Median, central interval, and observed per-100-gram nutrient span for this USDA source topic
NutrientMedianCentral 80%Observed spanRecords
Caloriesper 100 g46 kcal28 kcal–65 kcal19 kcal–71 kcal34
Proteinper 100 g2.9 g2.1 g–3.3 g1.1 g–5.2 g34
Carbohydrateper 100 g5 g3.4 g–7.1 g2.7 g–9.6 g34
Total fatper 100 g2.8 g0.4 g–3.5 g0.1 g–4.3 g34
Dietary fiberper 100 g3.4 g1.9 g–4.2 g1.3 g–4.4 g34
Total sugarsper 100 g0.7 g0.5 g–1.4 g0.3 g–5.3 g34
Sodiumper 100 g146 mg129 mg–221 mg20 mg–370 mg34
Potassiumper 100 g247 mg141 mg–532 mg135 mg–794 mg34
Calciumper 100 g151 mg99 mg–247 mg32 mg–272 mg34
Ironper 100 g1.1 mg0.7 mg–2.5 mg0.5 mg–3.2 mg34

All rows use the same 100-gram denominator and values from the cited records. The interval is descriptive, not a recommended intake range or statistical confidence interval.

A comparatively wide central spread

Iron: 1.1 mg calculated median

Among 34 “Other dark green vegetables” records, the central interval for iron extends from 0.7 mg to 2.5 mg per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 0.5 mg to 3.2 mg.

10th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 0.6 mg in Sweet potato, squash, pumpkin, chrysanthemum, or bean leaves… and 0.8 mg in Turnip greens, fresh, cooked, fat added; it is not itself an observed record value.

90th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 2.4 mg in Taro leaves, cooked and 2.6 mg in Beet greens, raw; it is not itself an observed record value.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Potassium: 247 mg calculated median

Among 34 “Other dark green vegetables” records, the central interval for potassium extends from 141 mg to 532 mg per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 135 mg to 794 mg.

10th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 140 mg in Kale, frozen, cooked, fat added and 144 mg in Kale, frozen, cooked, no added fat; it is not itself an observed record value.

90th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 414 mg in Dandelion greens, cooked and 583 mg in Bitter melon, horseradish, jute, or radish leaves, cooked; it is not itself an observed record value.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

A comparatively wide central spread

Total fat: 2.8 g calculated median

Among 34 “Other dark green vegetables” records, the central interval for total fat extends from 0.4 g to 3.5 g per 100 grams. The complete observed span is 0.1 g to 4.3 g.

10th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 0.4 g in Collards, frozen, cooked, no added fat and 0.4 g in Mustard greens, raw; it is not itself an observed record value.

90th percentile: The calculated boundary falls between 3.5 g in Dandelion greens, cooked and 3.5 g in Taro leaves, cooked; it is not itself an observed record value.

Percentile positions describe this finite source set; they are not labels of overall food quality.

The three callouts above are the widest central spreads relative to each metric’s midpoint, with a minimum scale applied so near-zero medians do not dominate. The complete table remains the primary record of all ten metrics.

Preparation language in the records

Source descriptions reveal meaningful distinctions.

The counts below report words and phrases that appear explicitly in the 34 USDA descriptions. They can help narrow a search to a closer record. They do not prove that the named preparation caused a nutrient difference, because these survey-food records are not controlled experiments.

cooked

29 records use this wording, including Beet greens, cooked; Bitter melon, horseradish, jute, or radish leaves, cooked; Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine.

frozen

11 records use this wording, including Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine; Collards, frozen, cooked with oil; Collards, frozen, cooked, no added fat.

no added fat

10 records use this wording, including Collards, fresh, cooked, no added fat; Collards, frozen, cooked, no added fat; Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fat.

fat added

8 records use this wording, including Greens, fresh, cooked, fat added; Greens, frozen, cooked, fat added; Kale, fresh, cooked, fat added.

raw

4 records use this wording, including Beet greens, raw; Dandelion greens, raw; Kale, raw.

canned

1 record uses this wording, including Greens, canned, cooked.

Portion context

Household measures answer a different question than 100 grams.

34 of 34 records (100%) include at least one named measure in the source data. Together those records provide 37 usable named measures.

A cup, slice, piece, sandwich, fillet, or fluid ounce can represent a different amount of food. Even two measures with the same label may have different gram weights across records. Open the closest profile and use its listed weight instead of transferring a measure from another record.

USDA’s representative source amount is also not necessarily what a visitor ate. For equal-weight comparison, use the 100-gram table. For meal estimation, match the exact description first, then match the amount, and finally account for additions or preparation details absent from the selected record.

Common named measures in this topic

Choosing a closer record

Use a sequence, not a guess disguised as precision.

  1. 01

    Match the exact description

    Look for the closest food name, preparation, additions, and context. “Other dark green vegetables” is the collection label; the individual description is the actual reference.

  2. 02

    Compare on equal weight

    Use the per-100-gram values when comparing two records. This keeps the denominator fixed and prevents different source-serving weights from masquerading as a food difference.

  3. 03

    Scale the closest listed measure

    Open the profile, select a named household measure when one fits, or enter a gram estimate. Treat scaled decimals as arithmetic from the source—not greater certainty about the plate.

  4. 04

    Add missing context

    Brand, recipe, cooking fat, sauce, toppings, substitutions, and edible portion can move the result. A current package label or weighed recipe may be more specific than a generic survey-food record.

Complete source catalog

All 34 “Other dark green vegetables” records

Records are alphabetical, not ranked. Every row links to a Feast profile with household measures, the 21-nutrient Feast panel, estimate factors, methodology, and the exact USDA FoodData Central source where available.

Complete alphabetical catalog of USDA records in this source topic
Exact USDA descriptionCaloriesProteinFiberSodiumSource amountReferences
Beet greens, cookedFDC 2709571 48 kcalper 100 g 2.3 gper 100 g 3.9 gper 100 g 365 mgper 100 g 75 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Beet greens, rawFDC 2709570 22 kcalper 100 g 2.2 gper 100 g 3.7 gper 100 g 226 mgper 100 g 19 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Bitter melon, horseradish, jute, or radish leaves, cookedFDC 2709641 56 kcalper 100 g 3.5 gper 100 g 1.8 gper 100 g 134 mgper 100 g 64 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarineFDC 2709583 54 kcalper 100 g 3.2 gper 100 g 4.2 gper 100 g 157 mgper 100 g 68 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Collards, fresh, cooked with oilFDC 2709582 61 kcalper 100 g 3.1 gper 100 g 4.2 gper 100 g 139 mgper 100 g 68 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Collards, fresh, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709577 34 kcalper 100 g 3.2 gper 100 g 4.3 gper 100 g 143 mgper 100 g 65 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarineFDC 2709585 55 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 178 mgper 100 g 88 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Collards, frozen, cooked with oilFDC 2709584 61 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 161 mgper 100 g 88 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Collards, frozen, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709578 36 kcalper 100 g 3 gper 100 g 2.8 gper 100 g 166 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Dandelion greens, cookedFDC 2709589 71 kcalper 100 g 2.8 gper 100 g 3.6 gper 100 g 209 mgper 100 g 55 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Dandelion greens, rawFDC 2709588 45 kcalper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 3.5 gper 100 g 76 mgper 100 g 28 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Greens with ham or porkFDC 2706759 47 kcalper 100 g 4.9 gper 100 g 3.6 gper 100 g 370 mgper 100 g 108 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Greens, canned, cookedFDC 2709598 41 kcalper 100 g 1.3 gper 100 g 1.3 gper 100 g 335 mgper 100 g 88 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Greens, fresh, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709596 58 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 4.1 gper 100 g 163 mgper 100 g 68 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Greens, fresh, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709593 37 kcalper 100 g 3 gper 100 g 4.2 gper 100 g 159 mgper 100 g 65 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Greens, frozen, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709597 59 kcalper 100 g 2.8 gper 100 g 2.6 gper 100 g 150 mgper 100 g 88 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Greens, frozen, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709594 37 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 146 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Kale, fresh, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709603 69 kcalper 100 g 3.1 gper 100 g 4.3 gper 100 g 185 mgper 100 g 68 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Kale, fresh, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709600 46 kcalper 100 g 3.1 gper 100 g 4.4 gper 100 g 181 mgper 100 g 65 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Kale, frozen, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709604 66 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 2.2 gper 100 g 136 mgper 100 g 88 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Kale, frozen, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709601 44 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 2.3 gper 100 g 132 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Kale, rawFDC 2709599 43 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 4.1 gper 100 g 53 mgper 100 g 13 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Mustard greens, fresh, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709610 53 kcalper 100 g 3 gper 100 g 3.3 gper 100 g 151 mgper 100 g 75 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Mustard greens, fresh, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709607 29 kcalper 100 g 3.1 gper 100 g 3.4 gper 100 g 146 mgper 100 g 70 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Mustard greens, frozen, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709611 41 kcalper 100 g 2.2 gper 100 g 2.7 gper 100 g 145 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Mustard greens, frozen, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709608 19 kcalper 100 g 2.3 gper 100 g 2.8 gper 100 g 141 mgper 100 g 83 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Mustard greens, rawFDC 2709606 27 kcalper 100 g 2.9 gper 100 g 3.2 gper 100 g 20 mgper 100 g 28 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Poke greens, cookedFDC 2709612 42 kcalper 100 g 2.2 gper 100 g 1.5 gper 100 g 138 mgper 100 g 75 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Sweet potato, squash, pumpkin, chrysanthemum, or bean leaves, cookedFDC 2709642 57 kcalper 100 g 2.1 gper 100 g 1.8 gper 100 g 128 mgper 100 g 35 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Taro leaves, cookedFDC 2709633 68 kcalper 100 g 5.2 gper 100 g 3.9 gper 100 g 133 mgper 100 g 75 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Turnip greens, fresh, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709637 42 kcalper 100 g 1.1 gper 100 g 3.4 gper 100 g 149 mgper 100 g 75 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Turnip greens, fresh, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709634 20 kcalper 100 g 1.1 gper 100 g 3.5 gper 100 g 145 mgper 100 g 73 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Turnip greens, frozen, cooked, fat addedFDC 2709638 51 kcalper 100 g 3.3 gper 100 g 3.3 gper 100 g 136 mgper 100 g 85 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗
Turnip greens, frozen, cooked, no added fatFDC 2709635 29 kcalper 100 g 3.3 gper 100 g 3.4 gper 100 g 131 mgper 100 g 83 gUSDA reference amount Full profileUSDA source ↗

Boundaries and provenance

What this collection can—and cannot—tell you.

This page summarizes USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) records from 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024. FNDDS supplies the nutrient profiles used for foods reported in What We Eat in America, the dietary component of NHANES. Each value here remains tied to one exact FDC record; the complete catalog provides direct links so the source can be checked rather than taken on trust.

USDA describes FNDDS nutrient profiles as average values for generic representations of foods likely consumed in the United States—not profiles of specific products. Its gram weights for portions are likewise estimates for groups of foods and may not cover every available size. That distinction matters: a database measure is evidence for scaling a plausible match, not proof that the same weight or formulation was on a visitor’s plate.

The records are not laboratory measurements of every possible “Other dark green vegetables” preparation. Restaurant recipes change, packaged products are reformulated, homemade ingredient ratios vary, and cooking can change water weight. A photo also cannot reliably reveal every hidden ingredient or gram weight. The central range describes variation among the records selected for this topic, not uncertainty around a single meal.

The median is not a default calorie count. The 10th and 90th percentiles are not lower and upper recommendations. The minimum and maximum are not promises that every real version falls inside the observed span. These statistics are tools for navigating a source collection while keeping the denominator, record name, and normal recipe variation visible.

Nutrient values do not establish whether a food is appropriate for a particular person or condition. This wiki does not diagnose deficiencies, prescribe targets, or replace advice from a qualified professional. If accuracy matters for an allergy, medical diet, or clinician-directed limit, use verified ingredient information and the guidance relevant to that situation.

Why no overall ranking appears.

A record can report more protein and also differ in sodium, fiber, energy, fat, portion weight, or ingredients. Choosing one metric as a universal score would hide those tradeoffs and imply a value judgment the data cannot support. The alphabetical catalog and side-by-side statistics are intentionally descriptive.

For primary-source context, read USDA’s FNDDS 2021–2023 documentation. For Feast’s import, filtering, portion-scaling, Daily Value, and uncertainty rules, read the nutrition-page methodology. For an exact item, use its profile and FoodData Central link rather than citing this collection-level summary alone.

Common questions

Using the “Other dark green vegetables” collection responsibly

Is the median the expected nutrition for my food?

No. It is the middle value among these 34 source records on a 100-gram basis. Your recipe, brand, preparation, and portion may align more closely with one specific record or may fall outside this collection.

Why compare 100 grams instead of one serving?

Source servings can have different gram weights and measure labels. Holding weight at 100 grams makes concentration comparable. After choosing a record, its household measures are more useful for estimating the amount actually eaten.

Does the upper end of a nutrient range mean “better”?

No. The position only describes that nutrient within this source collection. It does not evaluate the whole food, determine an appropriate portion, or account for an individual’s needs.

Which number should I log?

Start with the record whose exact wording most closely matches the food. Use a listed measure or gram estimate, then add missing recipe or preparation context. Keep the result as an estimate unless you have a current label or weighed recipe.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 12 exact records behind Other dark green vegetables source topic. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Dandelion greens, raw is higher in iron per 100 g

Dandelion greens, raw reports 3.1 mg versus 0.5 mg for Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine: a 2.6 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Mustard greens, raw is denser; Collards, frozen, cooked, no added fat is higher in its source amount

Mustard greens, raw reports 1.6 mg per 100 g and 0.5 mg in USDA source amount (28 g). Collards, frozen, cooked, no added fat reports a lower 1.1 mg per 100 g but a higher 1 mg in USDA source amount (85 g).

Choose the record before reading the number

Beet greens, cooked and Beet greens, raw are not interchangeable

The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes Preparation wording (No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw) the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Other dark green vegetables source topic, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Best next guide for this exact record Bitter melon

Bitter melon, horseradish, jute, or radish leaves, cooked is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Best next guide for this exact record Sweet potato

Sweet potato, squash, pumpkin, chrysanthemum, or bean leaves, cooked is explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.

Follow this evidence path
Compare two records on this page Beet greens, cooked vs Beet greens, raw

Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
Compare two records on this page Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine vs Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine

Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Source form: fresh versus frozen; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path
Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving context

In this page’s records, iron runs from 0.5 mg in Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine to 3.1 mg in Dandelion greens, raw, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Oil or table fat, NFS

USDA input 81200100 appears in 5 of 12 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 3–3 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path
A formulation detail that separates records Salt, table

USDA input 2047 appears in 9 of 12 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 0.3–0.3 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path