Vegetablesmoderate variability

Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine calories: 48 per 88 g

This exact USDA record reports 48 calories for 88 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 88 g

Calories
48 kcal
Protein
2.5 g
Carbohydrate
6.1 g
Total fat
2.3 g
Fiber
2.4 g
Sodium
157 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 88 g

48calories

Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine

Protein
2.5 g
Carbs
6.1 g
Fat
2.3 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709585

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 48 calories for USDA reference amount at 88 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 55 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 2.5 g protein, 2.4 g fiber, and 157 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, representing 96.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 48–96 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2709585: “Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2709585, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 66 g 36 kcal 1.9 g 1.8 g 117 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 88 g 48 kcal 2.5 g 2.4 g 157 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 175 g 96 kcal 5.1 g 4.7 g 312 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Other dark green vegetables

The comparison set contains 34 exact records in the Other dark green vegetables USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2709585’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

55 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
46 kcal
Middle 50%
37–57 kcal

Based on 34 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

2.9 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
2.9 g
Middle 50%
2.4–3.1 g

Based on 34 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

2.7 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
3.4 g
Middle 50%
2.7–3.9 g

Based on 34 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

upper quarter

178 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
146 mg
Middle 50%
136–165 mg

Based on 34 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2709585’s 88 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin A; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin A509.5 µg

≈ 57% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin C23 mg

≈ 25% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium157 mg

≈ 7% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat0.9 g

≈ 4% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709583 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 88 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 66–110 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 36 kcal and 61 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2709583

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1.5 g less dietary fiber than “Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt

    The source formulation has 3 input rows; Collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt supplies 96.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “frozen; cooked with butter or margarine” fits. Inspect FDC 2709583 when “fresh; cooked with butter or margarine” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine

Exact source wording
“Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709585 · FNDDS 72107231
Named qualifiers
frozen · cooked with butter or margarine
Source inputs unique in this pair
Collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine

Exact source wording
“Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709583 · FNDDS 72107228
Named qualifiers
fresh · cooked with butter or margarine
Source inputs unique in this pair
Collards, raw

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “frozen” and “cooked with butter or margarine”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordCollards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine 88 g48 kcal 55 kcal 2.9 g 2.6 g 2.7 g 178 mg
Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine 68 g37 kcal 54 kcal 3.2 g 3 g 4.2 g 157 mg
Collards, frozen, cooked with oil 88 g54 kcal 61 kcal 2.9 g 3.3 g 2.7 g 161 mg
Collards, frozen, cooked, no added fat 85 g31 kcal 36 kcal 3 g 0.4 g 2.8 g 166 mg
Collards, fresh, cooked with oil 68 g41 kcal 61 kcal 3.1 g 3.8 g 4.2 g 139 mg
Greens, frozen, cooked, fat added 88 g52 kcal 59 kcal 2.8 g 3.2 g 2.6 g 150 mg
Kale, frozen, cooked, no added fat 85 g37 kcal 44 kcal 2.9 g 1.2 g 2.3 g 132 mg

How to compare FDC 2709585: its source amount is 88 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2709585, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

96 kcal

175 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2709585, Vitamin A is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin A

509.5 µg≈ 57% Daily Value

Vitamin C

22.5 mg≈ 25% Daily Value

Calcium

179.5 mg≈ 14% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2709585’s 88 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 88 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 48 kcal Not established
Protein 2.5 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 6.1 g 2%
Total fat 2.3 g 3%
Dietary fiber 2.4 g 8%
Sugars 0.5 g Not established
Sodium 156.6 mg 7%
Saturated fat 0.9 g 4%
Monounsaturated Fat 0.5 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.5 g Not established
Cholesterol 3.5 mg 1%
Potassium 214.7 mg 5%
Calcium 179.5 mg 14%
Iron 1 mg 5%
Magnesium 25.5 mg 6%
Vitamin C 22.5 mg 25%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 509.5 µg 57%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 75.9 g Not established

For FDC 2709585, approximate percentages divide the displayed 88 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2709585 to 3 source inputs totaling 103.3 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

3 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, Table fat, NFS, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

103.3 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without saltUSDA ingredient 11164 · encyclopedia page available 100 GM 100 g 96.8%
2 Table fat, NFSUSDA ingredient 81100000 · encyclopedia page available 3 GM 3 g 2.9%
3 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.3 GM 0.3 g 0.3%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2709585, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Other dark green vegetables” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories55 kcal54 kcal+1 kcal
Protein2.9 g3.2 g−0.3 g
Carbohydrate6.9 g5.7 g+1.2 g
Total fat2.6 g3 g−0.4 g
Dietary fiber2.7 g4.2 g−1.5 g
Sodium178 mg157 mg+21 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 1.5 g less dietary fiber than “Collards, fresh, cooked with butter or margarine.”

Only this record lists Collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. Only the comparison record lists Collards, raw. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

1 of the six displayed differences clears the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Table fat, NFS; Salt, table.

Listed only in this record: Collards, frozen, chopped, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt.

Listed only in the comparison: Collards, raw.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 88 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (175 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 68 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (135 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2709585 with FDC 2709583 at equal mass; use their 88 g and 68 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2709585 versus FDC 2709583 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full other dark green vegetables source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2709585 appears in 1 pair page that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, raw versus cooked weight, cooking method, added fat or sauce.

For “Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    raw versus cooked weight

    Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    added fat or sauce

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2709585 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 55 kcal per 100 g becomes 48 kcal at 88 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2709585

FNDDS food code: 72107231

The scaling for FDC 2709585 can be exact while the match to “Collards, frozen, cooked with butter or margarine” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 88 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.