Vegetablesmoderate variability

Parsnips, cooked calories: 74 per 80 g

This exact USDA record reports 74 calories for 80 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 80 g

Calories
74 kcal
Protein
1 g
Carbohydrate
13.2 g
Total fat
2.3 g
Fiber
2.8 g
Sodium
105 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 80 g

74calories

Parsnips, cooked

Protein
1 g
Carbs
13.2 g
Fat
2.3 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709955

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 74 calories for USDA reference amount at 80 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 92 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 1 g protein, 2.8 g fiber, and 105 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, representing 96.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 74–198 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2709955: “Parsnips, cooked.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2709955, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 whole” through “1 cup, mashed” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 wholeUSDA-listed household measure 100 g 92 kcal 1.3 g 3.5 g 131 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 160 g 147 kcal 2.1 g 5.6 g 210 mg
1 cup, mashedUSDA-listed household measure 215 g 198 kcal 2.8 g 7.5 g 282 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Other vegetables and combinations

The comparison set contains 122 exact records in the Other vegetables and combinations USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2709955’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

92 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
45 kcal
Middle 50%
31–62 kcal

Based on 122 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

1.3 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.9 g
Middle 50%
1.2–2.8 g

Based on 122 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

upper quarter

3.5 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
2.3 g
Middle 50%
1.7–3.1 g

Based on 122 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

131 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
135 mg
Middle 50%
102–165 mg

Based on 122 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2709955’s 80 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin C10 mg

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Dietary fiber2.8 g

≈ 10% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium105 mg

≈ 5% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat0.6 g

≈ 3% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Parsnips, cooked,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709875 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 whole to 1 cup, mashed

    USDA assigns those measures 100 g and 215 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 92 kcal to 198 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2709875

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 6.9 g more carbohydrate than “Beets, fresh, cooked, fat added.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt

    The source formulation has 3 input rows; Parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt supplies 96.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “cooked” fits. Inspect FDC 2709875 when “fresh; cooked; fat added” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Parsnips, cooked

Exact source wording
“Parsnips, cooked”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709955 · FNDDS 75222020
Named qualifiers
cooked
Source inputs unique in this pair
Parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beets, fresh, cooked, fat added

Exact source wording
“Beets, fresh, cooked, fat added”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709875 · FNDDS 75208021
Named qualifiers
fresh · cooked · fat added
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beets, raw

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “cooked”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordParsnips, cooked 80 g74 kcal 92 kcal 1.3 g 2.8 g 3.5 g 131 mg
Peas and carrots, fresh, cooked, fat added 83 g74 kcal 89 kcal 3.2 g 3 g 4.4 g 172 mg
Salsify, cooked 70 g62 kcal 89 kcal 2.7 g 2.7 g 3 g 136 mg
Classic mixed vegetables, frozen, cooked with oil 93 g83 kcal 89 kcal 2.8 g 3.1 g 4.3 g 146 mg
Lotus root, cooked 63 g55 kcal 87 kcal 1.5 g 2.6 g 3 g 165 mg
Burdock, cooked 65 g65 kcal 100 kcal 1.6 g 2.9 g 3.4 g 135 mg

How to compare FDC 2709955: its source amount is 80 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2709955, the 3 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

147 kcal

160 g

1 whole

92 kcal

100 g

1 cup, mashed

198 kcal

215 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2709955, Vitamin C is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin C

10.1 mg≈ 11% Daily Value

Dietary fiber

2.8 g≈ 10% Daily Value

Potassium

284.8 mg≈ 6% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2709955’s 80 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2709955 at 80 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 2.8 g dietary fiber, about 10% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 80 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 74 kcal Not established
Protein 1 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 13.2 g 5%
Total fat 2.3 g 3%
Dietary fiber 2.8 g 10%
Sugars 3.7 g Not established
Sodium 104.8 mg 5%
Saturated fat 0.6 g 3%
Monounsaturated Fat 0.8 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.6 g Not established
Cholesterol 1.6 mg 1%
Potassium 284.8 mg 6%
Calcium 28.8 mg 2%
Iron 0.4 mg 2%
Magnesium 22.4 mg 5%
Vitamin C 10.1 mg 11%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 8.8 µg 1%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 62.4 g Not established

For FDC 2709955, approximate percentages divide the displayed 80 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2709955 to 3 source inputs totaling 103.3 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Parsnips, cooked” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

3 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt, Oil or table fat, NFS, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

103.3 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without saltUSDA ingredient 11299 100 GM 100 g 96.8%
2 Oil or table fat, NFSUSDA ingredient 81200100 · encyclopedia page available 3 GM 3 g 2.9%
3 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.3 GM 0.3 g 0.3%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2709955, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Other vegetables and combinations” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories92 kcal67 kcal+25 kcal
Protein1.3 g1.6 g−0.3 g
Carbohydrate16.5 g9.7 g+6.9 g
Total fat2.8 g2.8 g+0 g
Dietary fiber3.5 g2.8 g+0.7 g
Sodium131 mg205 mg−74 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 25 more calories, 6.9 g more carbohydrate, and 74 mg less sodium than “Beets, fresh, cooked, fat added.”

Only this record lists Parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. Only the comparison record lists Beets, raw. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Oil or table fat, NFS; Salt, table.

Listed only in this record: Parsnips, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt.

Listed only in the comparison: Beets, raw.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 80 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (160 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 88 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (175 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2709955 with FDC 2709875 at equal mass; use their 80 g and 88 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2709955 versus FDC 2709875 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full other vegetables and combinations source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, raw versus cooked weight, cooking method, added fat or sauce.

For “Parsnips, cooked,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    raw versus cooked weight

    Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    added fat or sauce

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2709955 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 92 kcal per 100 g becomes 74 kcal at 80 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2709955

FNDDS food code: 75222020

The scaling for FDC 2709955 can be exact while the match to “Parsnips, cooked” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 80 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.