Typical listed-weight range
97.1%–98.5%
The middle half of linked records spans 1.5 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Within Feast’s 3,850-record USDA FNDDS reference corpus, “Asparagus, canned, drained solids” appears as a formulation input in 3 finished-food records. Their calories and nutrients describe those complete foods, not the input label by itself. Use the catalog to choose the closest finished food and open its exact FoodData Central citation.
Browse all 3 linked food records →This page helps you find complete foods that include Asparagus, canned, drained solids in USDA’s nutrition data. Choose the record that most closely matches what you ate; Feast does not turn a collection average into a standalone ingredient estimate.
What the code means
Every occurrence collected here uses ingredient code 11015 and the source description “Asparagus, canned, drained solids.” The code is preserved exactly as it appears in the FNDDS input-food rows. It is not a FoodData Central FDC ID, so this page does not invent a standalone ingredient-record URL.
The strongest concentrations of linked records are currently Other vegetables and combinations (3). These are category counts within Feast’s selected 3,850-record corpus. They do not estimate how often the ingredient is eaten, how common it is in recipes generally, or its prevalence across every FNDDS release.
Collection-level interpretation
These summaries describe the linked FNDDS records in this exact corpus. They do not estimate consumer frequency, market share, or the composition of a meal. This is a very small set of 3 records: each observation can move the percentages, buckets, and interpolated quartiles substantially, so read the complete catalog rather than treating the summaries as stable population estimates.
Typical listed-weight range
The middle half of linked records spans 1.5 percentage points from the 25th to the 75th percentile. This is more resistant to a single extreme record than the full minimum-to-maximum range.
Largest linked category
3 of 3 linked records (100%) sit in this USDA category. The remainder span 0 other categories.
Most populated share band
3 records (100%) fall in this band after repeated rows for code 11015 are combined within each food.
Most frequent eligible co-input
It appears alongside code 11015 in 1 linked record (33%). Co-occurrence describes database structure, not a required recipe.
Where USDA uses this input
Each record is counted once even if ingredient code 11015 appears on more than one input row inside that formulation. The category grouping describes the complete linked foods, not a culinary rule about the ingredient.
Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil; Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine; Asparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat
Important nutrition boundary
No unique exact food-code match or reviewed sole-source bridge qualifies for a direct consumer answer. Feast therefore does not treat the collection median, minimum, maximum, or an arbitrary similar record as the nutrition of this input.
The table below describes the complete linked foods per 100 grams. Use it to find a closer finished-food record, not to infer what this formulation input supplies on its own.
Compare complete food records
Every value in this table describes an entire USDA survey-food record per 100 grams. The values are not the nutrient content of ingredient code 11015, and differences cannot be attributed to this one input.
| Whole-record nutrient | Observed minimum | Middle 50% | Median | Observed maximum | Linked records |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caloriesper 100 g of the complete food | 19 kcal | 29–42 kcal | 38 kcal | 45 kcal | 3 |
| Proteinper 100 g of the complete food | 2.1 g | 2.1–2.1 g | 2.1 g | 2.1 g | 3 |
| Carbohydrateper 100 g of the complete food | 2.4 g | 2.4–2.4 g | 2.4 g | 2.5 g | 3 |
| Total fatper 100 g of the complete food | 0.7 g | 1.7–3.2 g | 2.8 g | 3.5 g | 3 |
| Dietary fiberper 100 g of the complete food | 1.6 g | 1.6–1.6 g | 1.6 g | 1.6 g | 3 |
| Sodiumper 100 g of the complete food | 279 mg | 283–292 mg | 287 mg | 296 mg | 3 |
The minimum and maximum preserve the complete observed span. The median is the middle linked-record value, not a prediction for a meal and not an ingredient-specific nutrient estimate.
Complete linked catalog
This is the complete qualifying-corpus catalog, not a hand-picked sample. Search by food name or USDA category, then open a profile for household portions, Feast’s 21-nutrient panel, formulation details, and its exact FDC citation.
3 records shown
| Linked USDA food record | USDA category | Formulation | Listed input weight | Weight share | Calories | Protein | Sodium | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine | Other vegetables and combinations | 2 input rows | 100 g | 97.1% | 38 kcal | 2.1 g | 296 mg | FDC 2709846 ↗ |
| Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil | Other vegetables and combinations | 2 input rows | 100 g | 97.1% | 45 kcal | 2.1 g | 279 mg | FDC 2709845 ↗ |
| Asparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat | Other vegetables and combinations | Sole source | 100 g | 100% | 19 kcal | 2.1 g | 287 mg | FDC 2709836 ↗ |
No linked record matches that filter. Clear the search to restore the complete catalog.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 3 exact records behind Asparagus, canned, drained solids (USDA input 11015). Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil reports 3.5 g versus 0.7 g for Asparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat: a 2.9 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThe denominator changes the answer
Asparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat reports 2.1 g per 100 g and 2.6 g in USDA source amount (120 g). Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine reports a lower 2.1 g per 100 g but a higher 2.6 g in USDA source amount (123 g).
Record identity is part of the estimate
These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Asparagus, canned, drained solids (USDA input 11015), each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine and Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path 3 exact records carried forward AsparagusAsparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine and Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Asparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat vs Asparagus, rawAsparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: No matching controlled term in the source name versus raw; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Vegetable oil, NFSUSDA input 82101000 appears in 1 of 3 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 3–3 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path 3 context records in this source topic Other vegetables and combinationsAsparagus, canned, cooked with oil and Asparagus, canned, cooked with butter or margarine belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calories: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, calories runs from 19 kcal in Asparagus, canned, cooked, no added fat to 45 kcal in Asparagus, canned, cooked with oil, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path Inspect an exact record Asparagus, canned, cooked with oilOpen the full nutrient table, household measures, formulation inputs, and FoodData Central 2709845 citation for this exact record—not a name-level average.
Follow this evidence pathMethod and provenance
Feast begins with its pinned 3,850-record USDA FoodData Central Survey Foods reference corpus for FNDDS 2021–2023. Each exact food profile retains its FDC identifier, source-food description, nutrient values, household measures, and positive-weight input-food rows. This page groups those input rows by the exact ingredient code 11015; it does not merge similar-looking ingredient names or infer synonyms.
The distinct-record count deduplicates by FDC food record. When the same code is listed more than once inside one source formulation, its input weights are added before the listed-weight share is calculated. Category counts also count each food once. The 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile use the sorted one-share-per-food values with linear interpolation between adjacent ranks when a percentile falls between two records.
USDA’s current FNDDS documentation explains that many nutrient profiles are generated with calculation recipes designed to represent multiple variants, and that their input codes are not necessarily the exact ingredients in a retail product or an ingredient declaration. It also documents moisture and nutrient-retention adjustments. Feast therefore treats these rows as transparent source-calculation evidence—not as a reverse-engineered recipe.
The complete-food nutrient table uses each linked record’s available published per-100-gram values so the denominator remains consistent; its middle-50% ranges use the same interpolated percentile method. It is presented for record selection and comparison only. No nutrient value is reassigned to the ingredient, no causal effect is inferred, and no “healthy” score is manufactured from the collection.
Use the ingredient as a discovery clue. Compare the linked record names, food categories, preparation wording, source formulation, and portion measures. If a close record exists, its complete profile can provide a defensible reference estimate. If the meal differs materially in cooking fat, sauce, ingredient ratios, or portion size, keep looking or use recipe weights, a package label, or an editable photo estimate instead.
These pages are educational source indexes. They do not provide medical advice, personalized nutrient targets, food-safety guidance, or a recipe. If a clinician has given you individualized dietary instructions, follow that guidance and use the most specific current source available for the food you actually consumed.