Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition
1 cup (250 g) of lasagna with meat, homemade has about 515 calories. Choose your preparation and adjust the amount below.
Portion calculator
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 1 cup · 250 g
515calories
Lasagna with meat, home recipe
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2708753 Full nutrition profile →
A slice of lasagna has no single standard weight. Pick the closest recipe and preparation, then use the weight of your piece or a clearly matched serving from the calculator.
A worked portion example
Illustrative calculation: 1 cup weighs 250 g using the linked record's portion weight. At 206 calories per 100 g, 250 × 206 ÷ 100 = about 515 calories and 34 g protein. The home-recipe example includes pasta, beef, cheeses, sauce ingredients, and oil. It does not establish the recipe of your pan.
Check the exact food and household measure →Two pieces with the same width can have different depths and weights. The home-recipe meat lasagna lists separate 206 g and 232 g pieces, as well as a 250 g cup. Weigh a served piece when possible instead of treating every square cut as one serving.
Add the nutrition for the pasta, meat, sauce, cheeses, and oil you used. Weigh the finished lasagna without the pan. Your portion's share is its weight divided by the finished batch weight; multiply the recipe totals by that share. A home-recipe reference is a fallback when those details are unavailable.
Frozen meat lasagna, restaurant meat lasagna, and meatless vegetable lasagna have separate entries here. For a named frozen product, use its package label and check whether one tray contains more than one serving. Meatless does not tell you the quantity of cheese or sauce.
Editorial update: . Portion examples are calculations from the linked USDA records.
Lasagna is one of the cleaner source comparisons in this collection: all selected records use a 250-gram reference amount. That holds portion weight steady enough to make filling and preparation differences easier to inspect.
Across all 10 named USDA examples, a cup contains 243–518 calories. Each included example lists 250 g for that measure. The same household label can carry a different gram weight elsewhere in USDA data.
Match my meal
For Lasagna, begin by separating “Lasagna with meat, canned” from “Lasagna with meat and spinach.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.
Showing the first 6 of 10 linked records.
Equal-weight view
Five rank landmarks are shown from all 10 cited records: minimum, 25th-ranked, median-ranked, 75th-ranked, and maximum. Weight is held at 100 grams; source-serving weights are listed in the table.
Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories
What this page compares
This guide keeps 10 named USDA records in view: 10 direct matches. All sit within “Pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheese.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.
For Lasagna, this page can compare 10 named records from FDC 2708751 through FDC 2708755. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.
Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →
Editor’s decision brief
Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.
Portion
Equal source weights make the selected Lasagna serving totals easier to compare, but the eaten portion still has to be measured or estimated.
Composition
The lower endpoint is “canned”; the higher is “with meat and spinach.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.
Discriminator
Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “canned” (3.2 g) and “with chicken or turkey” (13.7 g).
Observed source examples
These 10 records each use a 250 g serving. Their serving calories compare equal weights within this set. They do not define a calorie range for every lasagna; match the preparation and adjust to your portion.
243kcal
250 g source amount · 97 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record463kcal
250 g source amount · 185 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact record518kcal
250 g source amount · 207 kcal per 100 g
Inspect this exact recordImportant: “Lower” begins with Lasagna with meat, canned; “higher” ends with Lasagna with meat and spinach, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every lasagna meal.
Full comparison
For Lasagna, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.
On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact source record | Match | Source amount | Calories | kcal / 100 g | Protein | Fiber | Sodium | USDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lasagna with meat, canned | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 243 kcal | 97 | 8.1 g | 3.8 g | 708 mg | FDC 2708751 ↗ |
| Lasagna with meat, frozen | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 310 kcal | 124 | 16.6 g | 3.5 g | 868 mg | FDC 2708754 ↗ |
| Lasagna, meatless | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 325 kcal | 130 | 16.4 g | 4.3 g | 710 mg | FDC 2708758 ↗ |
| Lasagna with meat | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 348 kcal | 139 | 18.6 g | 4 g | 975 mg | FDC 2708750 ↗ |
| Lasagna with meat, from restaurant | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 463 kcal | 185 | 27 g | 3.8 g | 1,165 mg | FDC 2708752 ↗ |
| Lasagna, meatless, with vegetables | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 470 kcal | 188 | 28 g | 3 g | 960 mg | FDC 2708759 ↗ |
| Lasagna, with chicken or turkey, and spinach | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 503 kcal | 201 | 33.8 g | 2.8 g | 953 mg | FDC 2708757 ↗ |
| Lasagna with chicken or turkey | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 513 kcal | 205 | 34.3 g | 2.5 g | 968 mg | FDC 2708756 ↗ |
| Lasagna with meat, home recipe | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 515 kcal | 206 | 34 g | 2.8 g | 1,040 mg | FDC 2708753 ↗ |
| Lasagna with meat and spinach | Direct name match | 250 gUSDA reference amount | 518 kcal | 207 | 33.3 g | 2.8 g | 1,030 mg | FDC 2708755 ↗ |
Portion analysis
Every selected record uses a 250-gram source amount, so serving-weight differences do not explain the calorie spread inside this set. Their own source servings run from 243 calories for “canned” to 518 for “with meat and spinach.” At a fixed 100 grams, “canned” is 97 calories and “with meat and spinach” is 207—a fixed-weight separation of 110 calories. For Lasagna, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “canned”, “meatless”, “meatless, with vegetables”, “with chicken or turkey”, and “with meat and spinach”. The source formulations contain 23 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include cheese, mozzarella, low moisture, part-skim, cheese, parmesan, grated, cheese, ricotta, whole milk, and eggs, grade a, large, egg whole. On this Lasagna page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.
What changes the comparison
The family label “Lasagna” cannot resolve the differences between Lasagna with meat, canned and Lasagna with meat and spinach. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.
Equal-looking squares can differ in thickness, moisture, and density even though the source amount is fixed.
The ratio of pasta, ricotta or other cheese, meat, and vegetables changes the profile.
A wetter preparation can weigh more per unit of energy and alter per-100-gram comparisons.
Canned, frozen, restaurant, and home-recipe entries are distinct FNDDS reference cases.
Record matching
Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that lasagna is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“canned”, “with meat”, “with chicken or turkey, and spinach”, and “with meat and spinach”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.
Decision support from the exact records on this page
These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 10 exact records behind Lasagna source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.
Equal-weight result
Lasagna with meat, home recipe reports 272 mg versus 12 mg for Lasagna with meat, canned: a 260 mg difference when both are normalized to 100 g.
Inspect the underlying evidenceThese listed servings have equal weights
The 10 records with a listed serving weight on this page each use 250 g. Their serving totals therefore compare equal weights, even if the household labels differ. Match the preparation and adjust the weight to the amount you eat.
Choose the record before reading the number
The page keeps both records at the same 100 g denominator and makes Source form (canned versus No matching controlled term in the source name) the explicit record-description contrast. It does not show that the wording difference caused a nutrient difference. Pick the description that matches the food in front of you rather than averaging away the distinction.
Inspect the underlying evidenceContextual knowledge graph
For Lasagna source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.
Both records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Source form: canned versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path Compare two records on this page Lasagna with meat, canned vs Lasagna with meat, home recipeBoth records appear in this page’s evidence set. The explicit record-description contrast is Source form: canned versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.
Follow this evidence path 5 exact records carried forward Lasagna with meatLasagna with meat and Lasagna with meat, canned are explicitly linked in this guide, which separates direct name matches from contextual variants.
Follow this evidence path 10 context records in this source topic Pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheeseLasagna with meat, canned and Lasagna with meat, frozen belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Cheese, mozzarella, low moisture, part-skimUSDA input 1029 appears in 5 of 10 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 907.2–907.2 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Cheese, parmesan, gratedUSDA input 1032 appears in 5 of 10 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 125–125 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.
Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving contextIn this page’s records, calcium runs from 12 mg in Lasagna with meat, canned to 272 mg in Lasagna with meat, home recipe, all per 100 g.
Follow this evidence path