Pasta, rice & grainsmoderate variability

Lasagna with meat, restaurant calories: 463 per 1 cup (250 g)

This exact USDA record reports 463 calories for 1 cup (250 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Exact USDA description: Lasagna with meat, from restaurant

Quick facts

1 cup · 250 g

Calories
463 kcal
Protein
27 g
Carbohydrate
28.5 g
Total fat
26.8 g
Fiber
3.8 g
Sodium
1,165 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 cup · 250 g

463calories

Lasagna with meat, from restaurant

Protein
27 g
Carbs
28.5 g
Fat
26.8 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2708752

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 463 calories for 1 cup at 250 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 185 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 27 g protein, 3.8 g fiber, and 1,165 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is restaurant, italian, lasagna with meat, representing 100% of the record’s listed input weight. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 cup at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 38–463 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2708752: “Lasagna with meat, from restaurant.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2708752, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 surface inch” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 surface inchUSDA-listed household measure 20.7 g 38 kcal 2.2 g 0.3 g 96 mg
1 piece (1/6 of 8" square, approx 2-1/2" x 4")USDA-listed household measure 206 g 381 kcal 22.2 g 3.1 g 960 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 250 g 463 kcal 27 g 3.8 g 1,165 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheese

The comparison set contains 169 exact records in the Pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheese USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2708752’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

185 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
154 kcal
Middle 50%
125–177 kcal

Based on 169 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

10.8 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
5.8 g
Middle 50%
4.4–6.3 g

Based on 169 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

1.5 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.5 g
Middle 50%
1–2 g

Based on 169 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

upper quarter

466 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
336 mg
Middle 50%
233–398 mg

Based on 169 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2708752’s 250 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Calcium; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Calcium493 mg

≈ 38% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin A202.5 µg

≈ 23% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat12.4 g

≈ 62% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium1,165 mg

≈ 51% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Lasagna with meat, from restaurant,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2708750 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 surface inch to 1 cup

    USDA assigns those measures 20.7 g and 250 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 38 kcal to 463 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2708750

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 5.7 g more total fat than “Lasagna with meat.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Single listed source: Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat

    USDA derives this record from one listed source-input row at 100 g. Real preparations can still differ in water, cooking state, brand, and served weight.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “from restaurant” fits. Inspect FDC 2708750 when the exact wording “Lasagna with meat” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Lasagna with meat, from restaurant

Exact source wording
“Lasagna with meat, from restaurant”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2708752 · FNDDS 58130014
Named qualifiers
from restaurant
Source inputs unique in this pair
Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Lasagna with meat

Exact source wording
“Lasagna with meat”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2708750 · FNDDS 58130011
Source inputs unique in this pair
Lasagna with meat & sauce, frozen entree

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “from restaurant”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordLasagna with meat, from restaurant 250 g463 kcal 185 kcal 10.8 g 10.7 g 1.5 g 466 mg
Lasagna with meat 250 g348 kcal 139 kcal 7.5 g 5 g 1.6 g 390 mg
Lasagna with meat and spinach 250 g518 kcal 207 kcal 13.3 g 10.8 g 1.1 g 412 mg
Lasagna with meat, frozen 250 g310 kcal 124 kcal 6.6 g 4.4 g 1.4 g 347 mg
Lasagna with meat, canned 250 g243 kcal 97 kcal 3.2 g 3.4 g 1.5 g 283 mg
Lasagna with meat, home recipe 250 g515 kcal 206 kcal 13.6 g 10.9 g 1.1 g 416 mg
Pasta with cream sauce and meat, restaurant 250 g533 kcal 213 kcal 5.7 g 14.1 g 0.9 g 562 mg

How to compare FDC 2708752: its source amount is 250 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2708752, the 4 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 piece (1/6 of 8" square, approx 2-1/2" x 4")

381 kcal

206 g

1 piece (1/8 of 7" x 12", approx 3-1/2" x 3")

429 kcal

232 g

1 cup

463 kcal

250 g

1 surface inch

38 kcal

21 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2708752, Saturated fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Saturated fat

12.4 g≈ 62% Daily Value

Sodium

1,165 mg≈ 51% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2708752’s 250 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2708752 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 27 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2708752 at 250 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 3.8 g dietary fiber, about 13% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
  • The representative USDA portion contains 1165 mg sodium, about 51% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 250 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 463 kcal Not established
Protein 27 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 28.5 g 10%
Total fat 26.8 g 34%
Dietary fiber 3.8 g 13%
Sugars 7.9 g Not established
Sodium 1,165 mg 51%
Saturated fat 12.4 g 62%
Monounsaturated Fat 8.3 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 2 g Not established
Cholesterol 90 mg 30%
Potassium 637.5 mg 14%
Calcium 492.5 mg 38%
Iron 2 mg 11%
Magnesium 55 mg 13%
Vitamin C 1.8 mg 2%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 202.5 µg 23%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 162.3 g Not established

For FDC 2708752, approximate percentages divide the displayed 250 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2708752 to one source input totaling 100 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Lasagna with meat, from restaurant” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

A single-source formulation

Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat is the only listed source input for this record. That does not mean every real-world version is identical; brands, preparation, water content, and portion weight can still differ.

100 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meatUSDA ingredient 36041 100 GM 100 g 100%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2708752, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheese” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories185 kcal139 kcal+46 kcal
Protein10.8 g7.5 g+3.4 g
Carbohydrate11.4 g16.2 g−4.8 g
Total fat10.7 g5 g+5.7 g
Dietary fiber1.5 g1.6 g−0.1 g
Sodium466 mg390 mg+76 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 46 more calories, 3.4 g more protein, and 4.8 g less carbohydrate than “Lasagna with meat.”

Only this record lists Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat. Only the comparison record lists Lasagna with meat & sauce, frozen entree. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Listed only in this record: Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat.

Listed only in the comparison: Lasagna with meat & sauce, frozen entree.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 250 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (250 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 250 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (250 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2708752 with FDC 2708750 at equal mass; use their 250 g and 250 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2708752 versus FDC 2708750 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full pasta mixed dishes, excludes macaroni and cheese source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2708752 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with restaurant formulation and serving size, amount served, cooked-to-dry ratio, sauce or mix-ins.

For “Lasagna with meat, from restaurant,” resolve restaurant formulation and serving size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    restaurant formulation and serving size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  3. 03

    cooked-to-dry ratio

    Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.

  4. 04

    sauce or mix-ins

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2708752 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 185 kcal per 100 g becomes 463 kcal at 250 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 cup has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2708752

FNDDS food code: 58130014

The scaling for FDC 2708752 can be exact while the match to “Lasagna with meat, from restaurant” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 250 g weight, 1-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.