Mixed disheshigher variability

Cabbage with ham hocks calories: 113 per 150 g

This exact USDA record reports 113 calories for 150 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 150 g

Calories
113 kcal
Protein
11.6 g
Carbohydrate
7.4 g
Total fat
3.9 g
Fiber
2.6 g
Sodium
516 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 150 g

113calories

Cabbage with ham hocks

Protein
11.6 g
Carbs
7.4 g
Fat
3.9 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706755

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 113 calories for USDA reference amount at 150 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 75 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 11.6 g protein, 2.6 g fiber, and 516 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is cabbage, cooked, as ingredient, representing 66.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 5 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 113–150 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706755: “Cabbage with ham hocks.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706755, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 112.5 g 84 kcal 8.7 g 1.9 g 387 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 150 g 113 kcal 11.6 g 2.6 g 516 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 200 g 150 kcal 15.5 g 3.4 g 688 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2706755’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

lower quarter

75 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

7.8 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

upper quarter

1.7 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

344 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706755’s 150 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin C36 mg

≈ 40% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Dietary fiber2.6 g

≈ 9% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium516 mg

≈ 22% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat1.2 g

≈ 6% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Cabbage with ham hocks,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706398 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 150 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 112.5–187.5 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 84 kcal and 141 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706398

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1.7 g more dietary fiber than “Ham or pork with gravy.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Cabbage, cooked, as ingredient

    The source formulation has 5 input rows; Cabbage, cooked, as ingredient supplies 66.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Cabbage with ham hocks” fits. Inspect FDC 2706398 when the exact wording “Ham or pork with gravy” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Cabbage with ham hocks

Exact source wording
“Cabbage with ham hocks”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706755 · FNDDS 27420010
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted · Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted · Pork, cured, ham and water product, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Ham or pork with gravy

Exact source wording
“Ham or pork with gravy”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706398 · FNDDS 27120020
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, cooked, roasted · Gravy, chicken, canned or bottled, ready-to-serve · Salt, table

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordCabbage with ham hocks 150 g113 kcal 75 kcal 7.8 g 2.6 g 1.7 g 344 mg
Ham or pork with stuffing 150 g215 kcal 143 kcal 6.3 g 8.3 g 0.4 g 319 mg
Ham and noodles, no sauce 196 g282 kcal 144 kcal 7.2 g 5.5 g 0.8 g 483 mg
Ham or pork with gravy 183 g293 kcal 160 kcal 20.2 g 7.5 g 0 g 349 mg
Ham or pork and potatoes with gravy 189 g238 kcal 126 kcal 5.4 g 6.3 g 0.9 g 301 mg
Ham and rice with mushroom sauce 310 g422 kcal 136 kcal 5.4 g 5.2 g 0.4 g 580 mg
Stuffed cabbage rolls with beef and rice 202 g230 kcal 114 kcal 8.3 g 5.1 g 1.3 g 338 mg

How to compare FDC 2706755: its source amount is 150 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706755, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

150 kcal

200 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706755, Vitamin C is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Vitamin C

35.7 mg≈ 40% Daily Value

Sodium

516 mg≈ 22% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706755’s 150 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706755 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 11.6 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2706755 at 150 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 516 mg sodium, about 22% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 150 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 113 kcal Not established
Protein 11.6 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 7.4 g 3%
Total fat 3.9 g 5%
Dietary fiber 2.6 g 9%
Sugars 4 g Not established
Sodium 516 mg 22%
Saturated fat 1.2 g 6%
Monounsaturated Fat 1.6 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.5 g Not established
Cholesterol 30 mg 10%
Potassium 382.5 mg 8%
Calcium 48 mg 4%
Iron 0.6 mg 4%
Magnesium 25.5 mg 6%
Vitamin C 35.7 mg 40%
Vitamin D 0.5 µg 2%
Vitamin A 7.5 µg 1%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 125.3 g Not established

For FDC 2706755, approximate percentages divide the displayed 150 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706755 to 5 source inputs totaling 300 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Cabbage with ham hocks” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

5 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Cabbage, cooked, as ingredient, Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted, Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

300 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roastedUSDA ingredient 10935 55 GM 55 g 18.3%
2 Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roastedUSDA ingredient 10917 15 GM 15 g 5%
3 Pork, cured, ham and water product, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roastedUSDA ingredient 10922 15 GM 15 g 5%
4 Pork, cured, ham with natural juices, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roastedUSDA ingredient 10928 15 GM 15 g 5%
5 Cabbage, cooked, as ingredientUSDA ingredient 99997530 200 GM 200 g 66.7%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706755, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories75 kcal160 kcal−85 kcal
Protein7.8 g20.2 g−12.5 g
Carbohydrate4.9 g1.6 g+3.3 g
Total fat2.6 g7.5 g−4.9 g
Dietary fiber1.7 g0 g+1.7 g
Sodium344 mg349 mg−5 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 85 less calories, 12.5 g less protein, and 3.3 g more carbohydrate than “Ham or pork with gravy.”

Only this record lists Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted; Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted; Pork, cured, ham and water product, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted; Pork, cured, ham with natural juices, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted. Only the comparison record lists Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, cooked, roasted; Gravy, chicken, canned or bottled, ready-to-serve; Salt, table. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Listed only in this record: Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted; Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted; Pork, cured, ham and water product, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted; Pork, cured, ham with natural juices, whole, boneless, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted; and 1 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Pork, fresh, loin, whole, separable lean only, cooked, roasted; Gravy, chicken, canned or bottled, ready-to-serve; Salt, table.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 150 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (200 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 183 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (244 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706755 with FDC 2706398 at equal mass; use their 150 g and 183 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706755 versus FDC 2706398 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Cabbage with ham hocks,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706755 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 75 kcal per 100 g becomes 113 kcal at 150 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706755

FNDDS food code: 27420010

The scaling for FDC 2706755 can be exact while the match to “Cabbage with ham hocks” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 150 g weight, 5-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.