Vegetablesmoderate variability

Cobb salad, no dressing calories: 98 per 1 cup (105 g)

This exact USDA record reports 98 calories for 1 cup (105 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 cup · 105 g

Calories
98 kcal
Protein
11.9 g
Carbohydrate
2.8 g
Total fat
4.5 g
Fiber
1.3 g
Sodium
167 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 cup · 105 g

98calories

Cobb salad, no dressing

Protein
11.9 g
Carbs
2.8 g
Fat
4.5 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709832

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 98 calories for 1 cup at 105 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 93 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 11.9 g protein, 1.3 g fiber, and 167 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is chicken breast, rotisserie, skin not eaten, representing 31.1% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 7 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 cup at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2709832: “Cobb salad, no dressing.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2709832, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 78.8 g 73 kcal 8.9 g 0.9 g 125 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 105 g 98 kcal 11.9 g 1.3 g 167 mg
125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 131.3 g 122 kcal 14.8 g 1.6 g 209 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Vegetable dishes

The comparison set contains 16 exact records in the Vegetable dishes USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2709832’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

93 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
86 kcal
Middle 50%
72–104 kcal

Based on 16 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

11.3 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
3.3 g
Middle 50%
1.9–4.7 g

Based on 16 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

1.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.2 g
Middle 50%
1.1–1.8 g

Based on 16 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

lower quarter

159 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
214 mg
Middle 50%
177–301 mg

Based on 16 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2709832’s 105 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin C9 mg

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Vitamin A86.1 µg

≈ 10% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium167 mg

≈ 7% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat1.1 g

≈ 6% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Cobb salad, no dressing,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709831 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 105 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 78.8–131.3 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 73 kcal and 122 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2709831

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 4.3 g more protein than “Spinach salad, no dressing.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Chicken breast, rotisserie, skin not eaten

    The source formulation has 7 input rows; Chicken breast, rotisserie, skin not eaten supplies 31.1% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “no dressing” fits. Inspect FDC 2709831 when “no dressing” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Cobb salad, no dressing

Exact source wording
“Cobb salad, no dressing”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709832 · FNDDS 75148010
Named qualifiers
no dressing
Source inputs unique in this pair
Lettuce, romaine, green, raw · Watercress, raw · Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Spinach salad, no dressing

Exact source wording
“Spinach salad, no dressing”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709831 · FNDDS 75147000
Named qualifiers
no dressing
Source inputs unique in this pair
Spinach, baby

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “no dressing”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordCobb salad, no dressing 105 g98 kcal 93 kcal 11.3 g 4.3 g 1.2 g 159 mg
Spinach salad, no dressing 74 g62 kcal 84 kcal 7 g 5.1 g 1.2 g 220 mg
Greek Salad, no dressing 105 g50 kcal 48 kcal 2.8 g 2.3 g 1.5 g 246 mg
Stuffed tomato, with rice and meat 99 g98 kcal 99 kcal 4.8 g 4.5 g 1 g 183 mg

How to compare FDC 2709832: its source amount is 105 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2709832, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

98 kcal

105 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2709832, Cholesterol is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Cholesterol

64.1 mg≈ 21% Daily Value

Vitamin C

9.5 mg≈ 11% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2709832’s 105 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2709832 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 11.9 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 105 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 98 kcal Not established
Protein 11.9 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 2.8 g 1%
Total fat 4.5 g 6%
Dietary fiber 1.3 g 5%
Sugars 1.2 g Not established
Sodium 167 mg 7%
Saturated fat 1.1 g 6%
Monounsaturated Fat 2.2 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.7 g Not established
Cholesterol 64.1 mg 21%
Potassium 295.1 mg 6%
Calcium 26.3 mg 2%
Iron 0.5 mg 3%
Magnesium 18.9 mg 5%
Vitamin C 9.5 mg 11%
Vitamin D 0.2 µg 1%
Vitamin A 86.1 µg 10%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 84.8 g Not established

For FDC 2709832, approximate percentages divide the displayed 105 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2709832 to 7 source inputs totaling 1,737 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Cobb salad, no dressing” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

7 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Chicken breast, rotisserie, skin not eaten, Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average, Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

1,737 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Lettuce, romaine, green, rawUSDA ingredient 100281 · encyclopedia page available 163 GM 163 g 9.4%
2 Watercress, rawUSDA ingredient 11591 136 GM 136 g 7.8%
3 Avocados, raw, all commercial varietiesUSDA ingredient 9037 · encyclopedia page available 168 GM 168 g 9.7%
4 Chicken breast, rotisserie, skin not eatenUSDA ingredient 24122171 · encyclopedia page available 540 GM 540 g 31.1%
5 Pork, cured, bacon, pre-sliced, cooked, pan-friedUSDA ingredient 10862 · encyclopedia page available 5 40 g 2.3%
6 Egg, whole, cooked, hard-boiledUSDA ingredient 1129 · encyclopedia page available 3 150 g 8.6%
7 Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round averageUSDA ingredient 11529 · encyclopedia page available 540 GM 540 g 31.1%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2709832, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Vegetable dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories93 kcal84 kcal+9 kcal
Protein11.3 g7 g+4.3 g
Carbohydrate2.7 g2.1 g+0.6 g
Total fat4.3 g5.1 g−0.7 g
Dietary fiber1.2 g1.2 gSame listed value
Sodium159 mg220 mg−61 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 4.3 g more protein and 61 mg less sodium than “Spinach salad, no dressing.”

Only this record lists Lettuce, romaine, green, raw; Watercress, raw; Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties; Chicken breast, rotisserie, skin not eaten. Only the comparison record lists Spinach, baby. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

2 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Pork, cured, bacon, pre-sliced, cooked, pan-fried; Egg, whole, cooked, hard-boiled.

Listed only in this record: Lettuce, romaine, green, raw; Watercress, raw; Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties; Chicken breast, rotisserie, skin not eaten; and 1 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Spinach, baby.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 105 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (105 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 74 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (74 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2709832 with FDC 2709831 at equal mass; use their 105 g and 74 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2709832 versus FDC 2709831 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full vegetable dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, raw versus cooked weight, cooking method, added fat or sauce.

For “Cobb salad, no dressing,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    raw versus cooked weight

    Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    added fat or sauce

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2709832 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 93 kcal per 100 g becomes 98 kcal at 105 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 cup has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2709832

FNDDS food code: 75148010

The scaling for FDC 2709832 can be exact while the match to “Cobb salad, no dressing” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 105 g weight, 7-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.