Snacks & dessertshigher variability

Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat calories: 271 per 60 g

This exact USDA record reports 271 calories for 60 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 60 g

Calories
271 kcal
Protein
3.6 g
Carbohydrate
40.5 g
Total fat
10.7 g
Fiber
1.8 g
Sodium
251 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 60 g

271calories

Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat

Protein
3.6 g
Carbs
40.5 g
Fat
10.7 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2707911

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 271 calories for USDA reference amount at 60 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 451 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 3.6 g protein, 1.8 g fiber, and 251 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, regular, lower fat, representing 100% of the record’s listed input weight. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 large answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 23–271 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2707911: “Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2707911, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 miniature/bite size” through “1 large” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 miniature/bite sizeUSDA-listed household measure 5 g 23 kcal 0.3 g 0.2 g 21 mg
1 Nabisco Chips Ahoy!USDA-listed household measure 10.7 g 48 kcal 0.6 g 0.3 g 45 mg
1 largeUSDA-listed household measure 45 g 203 kcal 2.7 g 1.4 g 188 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Cookies and brownies

The comparison set contains 83 exact records in the Cookies and brownies USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2707911’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

451 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
450 kcal
Middle 50%
428–486 kcal

Based on 83 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

6 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
5 g
Middle 50%
4–6.2 g

Based on 83 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

upper quarter

3 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
2.1 g
Middle 50%
1.5–2.9 g

Based on 83 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

418 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
351 mg
Middle 50%
259–433 mg

Based on 83 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2707911’s 60 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron2 mg

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Dietary fiber1.8 g

≈ 6% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat3.6 g

≈ 18% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium251 mg

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2707921 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 miniature/bite size to 1 large

    USDA assigns those measures 5 g and 45 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 23 kcal to 203 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2707921

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 3 g more protein than “Cookie, chocolate sandwich, reduced fat.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Single listed source: Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, regular, lower fat

    USDA derives this record from one listed source-input row at 100 g. Real preparations can still differ in water, cooking state, brand, and served weight.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “chocolate chip; reduced fat” fits. Inspect FDC 2707921 when “chocolate sandwich; reduced fat” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat

Exact source wording
“Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2707911 · FNDDS 53206030
Named qualifiers
chocolate chip · reduced fat
Source inputs unique in this pair
Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, regular, lower fat

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Cookie, chocolate sandwich, reduced fat

Exact source wording
“Cookie, chocolate sandwich, reduced fat”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2707921 · FNDDS 53209020
Named qualifiers
chocolate sandwich · reduced fat
Source inputs unique in this pair
Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “chocolate chip” and “reduced fat”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordCookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat 60 g271 kcal 451 kcal 6 g 17.9 g 3 g 418 mg
Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced sugar 60 g270 kcal 450 kcal 3.9 g 16.8 g 1.6 g 244 mg
Cookie, chocolate sandwich, reduced fat 42 g183 kcal 436 kcal 2.9 g 13.2 g 2.9 g 471 mg
Cookie, chocolate chip 60 g295 kcal 492 kcal 5.1 g 24.7 g 2 g 311 mg
Cookie, shortbread, reduced fat 60 g271 kcal 451 kcal 5.4 g 14 g 1.3 g 571 mg
Cookie, chocolate chip sandwich 42 g179 kcal 425 kcal 2.9 g 17.6 g 0 g 279 mg
Cookie, vanilla wafer, reduced fat 16 g71 kcal 441 kcal 5 g 15.2 g 1.9 g 388 mg

How to compare FDC 2707911: its source amount is 60 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2707911, the 6 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 miniature/bite size

23 kcal

5 g

1 small

90 kcal

20 g

1 medium

135 kcal

30 g

1 large

203 kcal

45 g

1 Nabisco Chips Ahoy!

48 kcal

11 g

1 100 calorie package

99 kcal

22 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2707911, Saturated fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Saturated fat

3.6 g≈ 18% Daily Value

Carbohydrate

40.5 g≈ 15% Daily Value

Total fat

10.7 g≈ 14% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2707911’s 60 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2707911 at 60 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 251 mg sodium, about 11% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 60 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 271 kcal Not established
Protein 3.6 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 40.5 g 15%
Total fat 10.7 g 14%
Dietary fiber 1.8 g 6%
Sugars 19.7 g Not established
Sodium 250.8 mg 11%
Saturated fat 3.6 g 18%
Monounsaturated Fat 3.3 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 3.4 g Not established
Cholesterol 0 mg 0%
Potassium 80.4 mg 2%
Calcium 0 mg 0%
Iron 1.9 mg 11%
Magnesium 19.2 mg 5%
Vitamin C 0 mg 0%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 0 µg 0%
Caffeine 7.8 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 4.4 g Not established

For FDC 2707911, approximate percentages divide the displayed 60 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2707911 to one source input totaling 100 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

A single-source formulation

Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, regular, lower fat is the only listed source input for this record. That does not mean every real-world version is identical; brands, preparation, water content, and portion weight can still differ.

100 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, regular, lower fatUSDA ingredient 18158 100 GM 100 g 100%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2707911, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Cookies and brownies” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories451 kcal436 kcal+15 kcal
Protein6 g2.9 g+3 g
Carbohydrate67.5 g76.2 g−8.7 g
Total fat17.9 g13.2 g+4.7 g
Dietary fiber3 g2.9 g+0.1 g
Sodium418 mg471 mg−53 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 3 g more protein, 8.7 g less carbohydrate, and 4.7 g more total fat than “Cookie, chocolate sandwich, reduced fat.”

Only this record lists Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, regular, lower fat. Only the comparison record lists Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

4 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Listed only in this record: Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, regular, lower fat.

Listed only in the comparison: Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 60 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 large (45 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 42 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 large sandwich (36 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2707911 with FDC 2707921 at equal mass; use their 60 g and 42 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2707911 versus FDC 2707921 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full cookies and brownies source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Deep comparisons

Controlled comparisons that include this exact record

FDC 2707911 appears in 2 pair pages that passed semantic, material-difference, source-evidence, and diversity gates. Each preserves a 100-gram denominator and both primary records.

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with piece or portion size, recipe or brand, fillings or frosting, added fats and sugars.

For “Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat,” resolve piece or portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    piece or portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe or brand

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    fillings or frosting

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

  4. 04

    added fats and sugars

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2707911 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 451 kcal per 100 g becomes 271 kcal at 60 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2707911

FNDDS food code: 53206030

The scaling for FDC 2707911 can be exact while the match to “Cookie, chocolate chip, reduced fat” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 60 g weight, 1-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.