Sandwiches, burgers & wrapshigher variability

Reuben sandwich calories: 606 per 1 sandwich (215 g)

This exact USDA record reports 606 calories for 1 sandwich (215 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 sandwich · 215 g

Calories
606 kcal
Protein
21.5 g
Carbohydrate
35.3 g
Total fat
41.7 g
Fiber
4.7 g
Sodium
1,479 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 sandwich, any size · 215 g

606calories

Reuben sandwich

Protein
21.5 g
Carbs
35.3 g
Fat
41.7 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706952

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 606 calories for 1 sandwich at 215 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 282 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 21.5 g protein, 4.7 g fiber, and 1,479 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is bread, rye, representing 27.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 6 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 sandwich at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706952: “Reuben sandwich.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706952, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 161.3 g 455 kcal 16.1 g 3.5 g 1,109 mg
1 sandwich, any sizeUSDA-listed household measure 215 g 606 kcal 21.5 g 4.7 g 1,479 mg
125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 268.8 g 758 kcal 26.9 g 5.9 g 1,849 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Deli and cured meat sandwiches

The comparison set contains 61 exact records in the Deli and cured meat sandwiches USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2706952’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

282 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
219 kcal
Middle 50%
192–266 kcal

Based on 61 records reporting energy.

Protein

lower quarter

10 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
13.9 g
Middle 50%
13–14.9 g

Based on 61 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

2.2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.2 g
Middle 50%
1–2.2 g

Based on 61 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

688 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
743 mg
Middle 50%
687–801 mg

Based on 61 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706952’s 215 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron4 mg

≈ 20% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Calcium252 mg

≈ 19% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium1,479 mg

≈ 64% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat12.4 g

≈ 62% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Reuben sandwich,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2707055 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 215 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 161.3–268.8 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 455 kcal and 758 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2707055

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1.1 g more dietary fiber than “Spam sandwich.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Bread, rye

    The source formulation has 6 input rows; Bread, rye supplies 27.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Reuben sandwich” fits. Inspect FDC 2707055 when the exact wording “Spam sandwich” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Reuben sandwich

Exact source wording
“Reuben sandwich”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706952 · FNDDS 27510950
Source inputs unique in this pair
Bread, rye · Cheese, swiss · Beef, cured, corned beef, brisket, cooked

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Spam sandwich

Exact source wording
“Spam sandwich”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2707055 · FNDDS 27560920
Source inputs unique in this pair
Bread, white, commercially prepared · Luncheon meat, pork with ham, minced, canned, includes Spam (Hormel) · Catsup

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordReuben sandwich 215 g606 kcal 282 kcal 10 g 19.4 g 2.2 g 688 mg
Spam sandwich 135 g359 kcal 266 kcal 10 g 12.8 g 1.1 g 913 mg
Bologna sandwich on white 115 g315 kcal 274 kcal 9.9 g 13.3 g 1.2 g 764 mg
Bologna sandwich on wheat 115 g313 kcal 272 kcal 10.9 g 13.5 g 2.8 g 759 mg
Italian sandwich on wheat 165 g508 kcal 308 kcal 16.4 g 18.9 g 2 g 1,010 mg
Italian sandwich on white 165 g510 kcal 309 kcal 15.7 g 18.8 g 0.8 g 1,010 mg
Salami sandwich on wheat 115 g367 kcal 319 kcal 16.1 g 17.3 g 2.8 g 1,080 mg

How to compare FDC 2706952: its source amount is 215 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706952, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 sandwich, any size

606 kcal

215 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706952, Sodium is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Sodium

1,479.2 mg≈ 64% Daily Value

Saturated fat

12.4 g≈ 62% Daily Value

Total fat

41.7 g≈ 54% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706952’s 215 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2706952 at 215 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 4.7 g dietary fiber, about 17% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
  • The representative USDA portion contains 1479 mg sodium, about 64% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 215 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 606 kcal Not established
Protein 21.5 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 35.3 g 13%
Total fat 41.7 g 53%
Dietary fiber 4.7 g 17%
Sugars 7.5 g Not established
Sodium 1,479.2 mg 64%
Saturated fat 12.4 g 62%
Monounsaturated Fat 14.1 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 10.1 g Not established
Cholesterol 92.5 mg 31%
Potassium 288.1 mg 6%
Calcium 251.6 mg 19%
Iron 3.6 mg 20%
Magnesium 45.2 mg 11%
Vitamin C 5.4 mg 6%
Vitamin D 0.2 µg 1%
Vitamin A 120.4 µg 13%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 111.2 g Not established

For FDC 2706952, approximate percentages divide the displayed 215 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706952 to 6 source inputs totaling 216 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Reuben sandwich” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

6 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Bread, rye, Beef, cured, corned beef, brisket, cooked, Sauerkraut, canned, solids and liquids. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

216 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Bread, ryeUSDA ingredient 18060 · encyclopedia page available 60 GM 60 g 27.8%
2 Cheese, swissUSDA ingredient 1040 · encyclopedia page available 21 GM 21 g 9.7%
3 Beef, cured, corned beef, brisket, cookedUSDA ingredient 13347 · encyclopedia page available 56 GM 56 g 25.9%
4 Sauerkraut, canned, solids and liquidsUSDA ingredient 11439 35 GM 35 g 16.2%
5 Oil or table fat, NFSUSDA ingredient 81200100 · encyclopedia page available 14 GM 14 g 6.5%
6 Salad dressing, thousand island, commercial, regularUSDA ingredient 4017 30 GM 30 g 13.9%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706952, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Deli and cured meat sandwiches” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories282 kcal266 kcal+16 kcal
Protein10 g10 gSame listed value
Carbohydrate16.4 g27.6 g−11.2 g
Total fat19.4 g12.8 g+6.6 g
Dietary fiber2.2 g1.1 g+1.1 g
Sodium688 mg913 mg−225 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 16 more calories, 11.2 g less carbohydrate, and 6.6 g more total fat than “Spam sandwich.”

Only this record lists Bread, rye; Cheese, swiss; Beef, cured, corned beef, brisket, cooked; Sauerkraut, canned, solids and liquids. Only the comparison record lists Bread, white, commercially prepared; Luncheon meat, pork with ham, minced, canned, includes Spam (Hormel); Catsup. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

5 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Listed only in this record: Bread, rye; Cheese, swiss; Beef, cured, corned beef, brisket, cooked; Sauerkraut, canned, solids and liquids; and 2 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Bread, white, commercially prepared; Luncheon meat, pork with ham, minced, canned, includes Spam (Hormel); Catsup.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 215 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 sandwich (215 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 135 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 sandwich (135 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706952 with FDC 2707055 at equal mass; use their 215 g and 135 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706952 versus FDC 2707055 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full deli and cured meat sandwiches source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with item size, bread or wrapper size, fillings, sauces and cheese.

For “Reuben sandwich,” resolve item size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    item size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    bread or wrapper size

    Resolve bread or wrapper size only when the meal or its source gives you evidence. If it is unknown, leave the uncertainty visible instead of choosing the most convenient variant.

  3. 03

    fillings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

  4. 04

    sauces and cheese

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706952 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 282 kcal per 100 g becomes 606 kcal at 215 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 sandwich has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706952

FNDDS food code: 27510950

The scaling for FDC 2706952 can be exact while the match to “Reuben sandwich” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 215 g weight, 6-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.