Fruitmoderate variability

Apple salad with dressing calories: 124 per 69 g

This exact USDA record reports 124 calories for 69 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 69 g

Calories
124 kcal
Protein
1 g
Carbohydrate
8.4 g
Total fat
9.8 g
Fiber
1.4 g
Sodium
60 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 69 g

124calories

Apple salad with dressing

Protein
1 g
Carbs
8.4 g
Fat
9.8 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709293

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 124 calories for USDA reference amount at 69 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 180 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 1 g protein, 1.4 g fiber, and 60 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is apples, raw, with skin (includes foods for usda's food distribution program), representing 56.8% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 5 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 124–247 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2709293: “Apple salad with dressing.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2709293, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 51.8 g 93 kcal 0.8 g 1 g 45 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 69 g 124 kcal 1 g 1.4 g 60 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 137 g 247 kcal 2 g 2.7 g 119 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Other fruits and fruit salads

The comparison set contains 27 exact records in the Other fruits and fruit salads USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2709293’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

upper quarter

180 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
83 kcal
Middle 50%
61–156 kcal

Based on 27 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

1.5 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.5 g
Middle 50%
0.7–1.9 g

Based on 27 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

2 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
1.8 g
Middle 50%
1.5–2.1 g

Based on 27 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

upper quarter

87 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
4 mg
Middle 50%
3–40 mg

Based on 27 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2709293’s 69 g reference weight, none of the compatible strength-side nutrients evaluated here reaches 5% Daily Value; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

No compatible strength-side nutrient evaluated here reaches 5% DV at this reference weight, so this page does not manufacture a “strength” from a negligible percentage.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat1.3 g

≈ 7% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium60 mg

≈ 3% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Apple salad with dressing,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2709310 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 69 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 51.8–86.3 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 93 kcal and 155 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2709310

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 1.2 g more dietary fiber than “Pineapple salad with dressing.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Apples, raw, with skin (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)

    The source formulation has 5 input rows; Apples, raw, with skin (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) supplies 56.8% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Apple salad with dressing” fits. Inspect FDC 2709310 when the exact wording “Pineapple salad with dressing” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Apple salad with dressing

Exact source wording
“Apple salad with dressing”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709293 · FNDDS 63401010
Source inputs unique in this pair
Celery, raw · Apples, raw, with skin (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) · Nuts, walnuts, English, halves, raw

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Pineapple salad with dressing

Exact source wording
“Pineapple salad with dressing”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2709310 · FNDDS 63413010
Source inputs unique in this pair
Pineapple, raw · Lettuce, iceberg, raw

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordApple salad with dressing 69 g124 kcal 180 kcal 1.5 g 14.2 g 2 g 87 mg
Pineapple salad with dressing 184 g193 kcal 105 kcal 0.5 g 5.8 g 0.8 g 48 mg
Fruit salad, including citrus fruits, with salad dressing or mayonnaise 94 g226 kcal 240 kcal 1.9 g 20.3 g 1.8 g 124 mg
Fruit salad, excluding citrus fruits, with salad dressing or mayonnaise 94 g232 kcal 247 kcal 1.8 g 20.7 g 1.5 g 127 mg
Fruit salad, fresh or raw, excluding citrus fruits, no dressing 75 g44 kcal 59 kcal 0.6 g 0.2 g 1.5 g 4 mg
Fruit salad, fresh or raw, including citrus fruits, no dressing 75 g42 kcal 56 kcal 0.7 g 0.2 g 1.7 g 4 mg
Fruit salad, including citrus fruit, with whipped cream 91 g144 kcal 158 kcal 2.1 g 10.4 g 2 g 3 mg

How to compare FDC 2709293: its source amount is 69 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2709293, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

247 kcal

137 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2709293, Total fat is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Total fat

9.8 g≈ 13% Daily Value

Saturated fat

1.3 g≈ 7% Daily Value

Dietary fiber

1.4 g≈ 5% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2709293’s 69 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 69 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 124 kcal Not established
Protein 1 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 8.4 g 3%
Total fat 9.8 g 13%
Dietary fiber 1.4 g 5%
Sugars 6.3 g Not established
Sodium 60 mg 3%
Saturated fat 1.3 g 7%
Monounsaturated Fat 1.9 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 6.2 g Not established
Cholesterol 3.5 mg 1%
Potassium 102.1 mg 2%
Calcium 10.4 mg 1%
Iron 0.2 mg 1%
Magnesium 10.4 mg 2%
Vitamin C 2.3 mg 3%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 4.1 µg 0%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 49.3 g Not established

For FDC 2709293, approximate percentages divide the displayed 69 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2709293 to 5 source inputs totaling 440.5 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Apple salad with dressing” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

5 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Apples, raw, with skin (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program), Grapes, raw, Salad dressing, mayonnaise, regular. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

440.5 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Celery, rawUSDA ingredient 11143 · encyclopedia page available 30 GM 30 g 6.8%
2 Apples, raw, with skin (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)USDA ingredient 9003 · encyclopedia page available 250 GM 250 g 56.8%
3 Nuts, walnuts, English, halves, rawUSDA ingredient 12155 · encyclopedia page available 30 GM 30 g 6.8%
4 Grapes, rawUSDA ingredient 63123000 · encyclopedia page available 75.5 GM 75.5 g 17.1%
5 Salad dressing, mayonnaise, regularUSDA ingredient 4025 · encyclopedia page available 0.25 C 55 g 12.5%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2709293, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Other fruits and fruit salads” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories180 kcal105 kcal+75 kcal
Protein1.5 g0.5 g+1 g
Carbohydrate12.2 g12.8 g−0.6 g
Total fat14.2 g5.8 g+8.4 g
Dietary fiber2 g0.8 g+1.2 g
Sodium87 mg48 mg+39 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 75 more calories, 8.4 g more total fat, and 1.2 g more dietary fiber than “Pineapple salad with dressing.”

Only this record lists Celery, raw; Apples, raw, with skin (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program); Nuts, walnuts, English, halves, raw; Grapes, raw. Only the comparison record lists Pineapple, raw; Lettuce, iceberg, raw. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Salad dressing, mayonnaise, regular.

Listed only in this record: Celery, raw; Apples, raw, with skin (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program); Nuts, walnuts, English, halves, raw; Grapes, raw.

Listed only in the comparison: Pineapple, raw; Lettuce, iceberg, raw.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 69 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (137 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 184 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 serving (184 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2709293 with FDC 2709310 at equal mass; use their 69 g and 184 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2709293 versus FDC 2709310 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full other fruits and fruit salads source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with piece or portion size, variety and ripeness, fresh versus cooked form, added sweeteners.

For “Apple salad with dressing,” resolve piece or portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    piece or portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    variety and ripeness

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    fresh versus cooked form

    Match the food state before matching the number. Cooking, draining, or added liquid can change grams and concentration even when the food name barely changes.

  4. 04

    added sweeteners

    Use a label or known recipe when available, because sweetness does not reveal dose. Keep syrups, sugars, and concentrated add-ins separate when the base record does not name them.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2709293 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 180 kcal per 100 g becomes 124 kcal at 69 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2709293

FNDDS food code: 63401010

The scaling for FDC 2709293 can be exact while the match to “Apple salad with dressing” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 69 g weight, 5-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.