Meat & poultrymoderate variability

Beef, steak, flank calories: 389 per 1 regular (160 g)

This exact USDA record reports 389 calories for 1 regular (160 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 regular · 160 g

Calories
389 kcal
Protein
46.6 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
Total fat
22.6 g
Fiber
0 g
Sodium
592 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 regular · 160 g

389calories

Beef, steak, flank

Protein
46.6 g
Carbs
0 g
Fat
22.6 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2705827

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 389 calories for 1 regular at 160 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 243 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 46.6 g protein, 0 g fiber, and 592 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled, representing 99.2% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 2 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 regular at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 41–583 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2705827: “Beef, steak, flank.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2705827, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “1 cubic inch” through “1 thick” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
1 cubic inchUSDA-listed household measure 17 g 41 kcal 4.9 g 0 g 63 mg
1 regularUSDA-listed household measure 160 g 389 kcal 46.6 g 0 g 592 mg
1 thickUSDA-listed household measure 240 g 583 kcal 69.8 g 0 g 888 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Beef, excludes ground

The comparison set contains 25 exact records in the Beef, excludes ground USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2705827’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

243 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
251 kcal
Middle 50%
225–257 kcal

Based on 25 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

29.1 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
26.5 g
Middle 50%
25.9–28.4 g

Based on 25 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

0 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0 g
Middle 50%
0–0 g

Based on 25 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

370 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
370 mg
Middle 50%
361–377 mg

Based on 25 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2705827’s 160 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron4 mg

≈ 22% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Potassium474 mg

≈ 10% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Saturated fat8 g

≈ 40% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Sodium592 mg

≈ 26% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Beef, steak, flank,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2705825 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Listed portion span: 1 cubic inch to 1 thick

    USDA assigns those measures 17 g and 240 g. At this record’s fixed composition, scaled energy moves from 41 kcal to 583 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2705825

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 3.1 g more protein than “Beef, steak, chuck.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled

    The source formulation has 2 input rows; Beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled supplies 99.2% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when “steak; flank” fits. Inspect FDC 2705825 when “steak; chuck” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Beef, steak, flank

Exact source wording
“Beef, steak, flank”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705827 · FNDDS 21101160
Named qualifiers
steak · flank
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beef, steak, chuck

Exact source wording
“Beef, steak, chuck”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2705825 · FNDDS 21101140
Named qualifiers
steak · chuck
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beef, chuck, under blade center steak, boneless, Denver Cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “steak” and “flank”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordBeef, steak, flank 160 g389 kcal 243 kcal 29.1 g 14.1 g 0 g 370 mg
Beef, steak, chuck 160 g360 kcal 225 kcal 26 g 13.4 g 0 g 380 mg
Beef, steak, tenderloin 160 g314 kcal 196 kcal 30.5 g 8.3 g 0 g 366 mg
Beef, steak, cube 160 g299 kcal 187 kcal 28.8 g 7.1 g 0 g 379 mg
Beef, steak, round 160 g266 kcal 166 kcal 29.7 g 4.3 g 0 g 382 mg
Beef, sandwich steak 60 g196 kcal 326 kcal 18.3 g 27.6 g 0 g 359 mg
Beef, steak, country fried 160 g490 kcal 306 kcal 19.9 g 21 g 0.3 g 432 mg

How to compare FDC 2705827: its source amount is 160 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2705827, the 6 displayed measures scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 piece/slice, any size

73 kcal

30 g

1 thin

292 kcal

120 g

1 regular

389 kcal

160 g

1 thick

583 kcal

240 g

1 oz yields

49 kcal

20 g

1 cubic inch

41 kcal

17 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2705827, Cholesterol is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Cholesterol

145.6 mg≈ 49% Daily Value

Saturated fat

8 g≈ 40% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2705827’s 160 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2705827 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 46.6 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2705827 at 160 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 592 mg sodium, about 26% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 160 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 389 kcal Not established
Protein 46.6 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 0 g 0%
Total fat 22.6 g 29%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0%
Sugars 0 g Not established
Sodium 592 mg 26%
Saturated fat 8 g 40%
Monounsaturated Fat 10 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 1 g Not established
Cholesterol 145.6 mg 49%
Potassium 473.6 mg 10%
Calcium 11.2 mg 1%
Iron 3.9 mg 22%
Magnesium 36.8 mg 9%
Vitamin C 0 mg 0%
Vitamin D 0.2 µg 1%
Vitamin A 11.2 µg 1%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 89 g Not established

For FDC 2705827, approximate percentages divide the displayed 160 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2705827 to 2 source inputs totaling 100.8 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Beef, steak, flank” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

2 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100.8 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilledUSDA ingredient 23214 100 GM 100 g 99.2%
2 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.8 GM 0.8 g 0.8%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2705827, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Beef, excludes ground” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories243 kcal225 kcal+18 kcal
Protein29.1 g26 g+3.1 g
Carbohydrate0 g0.2 g−0.2 g
Total fat14.1 g13.4 g+0.7 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 gSame listed value
Sodium370 mg380 mg−10 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 18 more calories and 3.1 g more protein than “Beef, steak, chuck.”

Only this record lists Beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled. Only the comparison record lists Beef, chuck, under blade center steak, boneless, Denver Cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

2 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Salt, table.

Listed only in this record: Beef, plate steak, boneless, inside skirt, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.

Listed only in the comparison: Beef, chuck, under blade center steak, boneless, Denver Cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets match

This record’s reference amount is 160 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 regular (160 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 160 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 regular (160 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2705827 with FDC 2705825 at equal mass; use their 160 g and 160 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2705827 versus FDC 2705825 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full beef, excludes ground source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with portion size, cut and fat trim, cooking method, breading, marinade, or sauce.

For “Beef, steak, flank,” resolve portion size first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    portion size

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    cut and fat trim

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  3. 03

    cooking method

    Match the method named by the source—such as baked, fried, boiled, or grilled—before scaling. Preparation can change both water content and the ingredients retained in the finished food.

  4. 04

    breading, marinade, or sauce

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2705827 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 243 kcal per 100 g becomes 389 kcal at 160 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 regular has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2705827

FNDDS food code: 21101160

The scaling for FDC 2705827 can be exact while the match to “Beef, steak, flank” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 160 g weight, 2-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.