Mixed disheshigher variability

Meat with tomato sauce calories: 279 per 187 g

This exact USDA record reports 279 calories for 187 g. That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Exact USDA description: Meat with tomato-based sauce

Quick facts

USDA reference amount · 187 g

Calories
279 kcal
Protein
40.6 g
Carbohydrate
3 g
Total fat
11.9 g
Fiber
0.7 g
Sodium
664 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 187 g

279calories

Meat with tomato-based sauce

Protein
40.6 g
Carbs
3 g
Fat
11.9 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706469

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 279 calories for USDA reference amount at 187 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 149 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 40.6 g protein, 0.7 g fiber, and 664 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled, representing 69.7% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 3 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The reference amount and 1 cup answer different portion questions. Their values are scaled independently from the same per-100-gram source record.

The household measures attached to this record span roughly 279–371 calories across the listed portions. That is a set of scaled examples—not a confidence interval, a recommendation, or a claim about the full universe of recipes.

Calculated from the smallest and largest usable household measures listed by USDA for this exact FNDDS record; not a confidence interval.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706469: “Meat with tomato-based sauce.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706469, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “1 cup” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 140.3 g 209 kcal 30.4 g 0.6 g 498 mg
USDA reference amountExact record reference weight 187 g 279 kcal 40.6 g 0.7 g 664 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 249 g 371 kcal 54 g 1 g 884 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “middle half” describes FDC 2706469’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

middle half

149 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

upper quarter

21.7 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

lower quarter

0.4 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

355 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706469’s 187 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Iron4 mg

≈ 21% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Potassium494 mg

≈ 11% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium664 mg

≈ 29% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat4.5 g

≈ 22% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Meat with tomato-based sauce,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706370 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 187 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 140.3–233.8 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 209 kcal and 348 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706370

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 8 mg less sodium than “Beef with tomato-based sauce.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled

    The source formulation has 3 input rows; Beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled supplies 69.7% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Meat with tomato-based sauce” fits. Inspect FDC 2706370 when the exact wording “Beef with tomato-based sauce” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Meat with tomato-based sauce

Exact source wording
“Meat with tomato-based sauce”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706469 · FNDDS 27162010

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beef with tomato-based sauce

Exact source wording
“Beef with tomato-based sauce”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706370 · FNDDS 27111000

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordMeat with tomato-based sauce 187 g279 kcal 149 kcal 21.7 g 6.4 g 0.4 g 355 mg
Beef with tomato-based sauce 187 g279 kcal 149 kcal 21.7 g 6.4 g 0.4 g 363 mg
Meat loaf made with beef, with tomato-based sauce 108 g172 kcal 159 kcal 13.8 g 8.4 g 0.7 g 429 mg
Sausage with tomato-based sauce 186 g435 kcal 234 kcal 13.3 g 19.1 g 0.4 g 863 mg
Ham or pork with tomato-based sauce 187 g286 kcal 153 kcal 20.3 g 6.8 g 0.4 g 352 mg
Porcupine balls with tomato-based sauce 132 g202 kcal 153 kcal 10.4 g 6.2 g 0.6 g 501 mg
Meat loaf made with beef and pork, with tomato-based sauce 108 g170 kcal 157 kcal 13.6 g 8.2 g 0.7 g 426 mg

How to compare FDC 2706469: its source amount is 187 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706469, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

371 kcal

249 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706469, Cholesterol is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Cholesterol

117.8 mg≈ 39% Daily Value

Sodium

663.9 mg≈ 29% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706469’s 187 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706469 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 40.6 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2706469 at 187 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion contains 664 mg sodium, about 29% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 187 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 279 kcal Not established
Protein 40.6 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 3 g 1%
Total fat 11.9 g 15%
Dietary fiber 0.7 g 3%
Sugars 2 g Not established
Sodium 663.9 mg 29%
Saturated fat 4.5 g 22%
Monounsaturated Fat 5 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 0.5 g Not established
Cholesterol 117.8 mg 39%
Potassium 493.7 mg 11%
Calcium 16.8 mg 1%
Iron 3.8 mg 21%
Magnesium 33.7 mg 8%
Vitamin C 3.7 mg 4%
Vitamin D 0.2 µg 1%
Vitamin A 11.2 µg 1%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 128.7 g Not established

For FDC 2706469, approximate percentages divide the displayed 187 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706469 to 3 source inputs totaling 100.5 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Meat with tomato-based sauce” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

3 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled, Tomato products, canned, sauce, Salt, table. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

100.5 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiledUSDA ingredient 13893 · encyclopedia page available 70 GM 70 g 69.7%
2 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 1.2 0.5 g 0.5%
3 Tomato products, canned, sauceUSDA ingredient 11549 · encyclopedia page available 30 GM 30 g 29.9%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706469, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories149 kcal149 kcalSame listed value
Protein21.7 g21.7 gSame listed value
Carbohydrate1.6 g1.6 gSame listed value
Total fat6.4 g6.4 gSame listed value
Dietary fiber0.4 g0.4 gSame listed value
Sodium355 mg363 mg−8 mg

Plain-English read

The six displayed nutrient values are close under a conservative materiality screen. Small differences remain exact source values, not evidence that one food is preferable.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Shared listed inputs: Beef, round, top round steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled; Salt, table; Tomato products, canned, sauce.

The ingredient codes overlap, while at least one listed amount, weight, sequence, or formulation detail differs.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 187 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (249 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 187 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (249 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706469 with FDC 2706370 at equal mass; use their 187 g and 187 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706469 versus FDC 2706370 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Meat with tomato-based sauce,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706469 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 149 kcal per 100 g becomes 279 kcal at 187 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” We display it as a USDA reference amount because it is a database comparison point—not a suggested portion or a claim about what most people should eat.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706469

FNDDS food code: 27162010

The scaling for FDC 2706469 can be exact while the match to “Meat with tomato-based sauce” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 187 g weight, 3-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.