Portion analysis
Serving total and calorie density answer different questions
The listed source amounts run from 172 to 332 grams—a 160-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 458 calories for “cheese, from restaurant or fast food, thin crust” to 923 for “thick crust.” At a fixed 100 grams, “cheese, with vegetables, from restaurant or fast food, thin crust” is 234 calories and “from restaurant or fast food, medium crust” is 282—a fixed-weight separation of 48 calories. For Pizza, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.
The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.
Preparation analysis
The long description carries the evidence
The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “cheese, from restaurant or fast food, thin crust”, “cheese, from restaurant or fast food, thick crust”, “cheese, with vegetables, from restaurant or fast food, thick crust”, “from frozen, thick crust”, and “thick crust”. The source formulations contain 11 distinct ingredient codes; examples that appear in only part of the set include fast food, pizza chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, regular crust, fast food, pizza chain, 14" pizza, cheese topping, thick crust, pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced, and onions, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt. On this Pizza page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.
Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.