Feast Get Feast
Menu

Portions and preparation · USDA nutrition

Potato baked peel calories per cup: 121–256 across all 14 named USDA examples

Across all 14 named USDA examples, a cup contains 121–256 calories. Their listed weights span 130–160 g, so each calorie value is calculated from that example's own gram weight and published calories per 100 g.

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 medium · 285 g

265calories

Potato, baked, peel eaten

Protein
7.1 g
Carbs
59.9 g
Fat
0.4 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2709524 Full nutrition profile →

Compare all 14 food records, nutrition tables and USDA sources

The 14 exact records in this guide report 265–504 calories in the records' own listed source servings and 93–160 calories per 100 grams. Those are observations from named database records—not a universal range or an estimate of an unseen plate.

Match my meal

Start with the description closest to what you ate

For Potato baked peel, begin by separating “Potato, baked, peel eaten” from “Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with vegetables.” Choosing a card filters this source set; it does not infer the portion or fill in ingredients the chosen description does not name.

Showing the first 6 of 14 linked records.

Equal-weight view

How potato baked peel records compare at 100 grams

Five rank landmarks are shown from all 14 cited records: minimum, 25th-ranked, median-ranked, 75th-ranked, and maximum. Weight is held at 100 grams; source-serving weights are listed in the table.

  1. Minimum: Potato, baked, peel eaten 93 kcal
    93 kcal
  2. 25th-ranked landmark: Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with butter 125 kcal
    125 kcal
  3. Median-ranked landmark: Potato, baked, peel eaten, with vegetables 142 kcal
    142 kcal
  4. 75th-ranked landmark: Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with chili 143 kcal
    143 kcal
  5. Maximum: Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with meat 160 kcal
    160 kcal

Shared basis: 100 g · kilocalories

What this page compares

Named source records, not one universal meal

This guide keeps 14 named USDA records in view: 14 direct matches. All sit within “White potatoes, baked or boiled.” The exact descriptions remain the unit of comparison; the familiar heading is only the doorway into the evidence.

Why these records appear together: The deterministic grouping rule “normalized first two description segments” placed these 14 records together under the exact grouping key “potato baked.” That rule determines membership before any nutrition result is read.

For Potato baked peel, this page can compare 14 named records from FDC 2709524 through FDC 2709523. It cannot observe which preparation was eaten, recover unnamed additions, or supply the eaten grams.

Read the shared calculation, provenance, and uncertainty method →

Editor’s decision brief

The three facts to carry into the table

Carry the denominator, exact identity, and strongest observed contrast into every number below.

Portion

285–315 g before composition

The largest source amount is 1.1× the smallest. Read per-serving calorie differences with that mass gap in view.

Composition

67 kcal separates the fixed-weight endpoints

The lower endpoint is “baked, peel eaten”; the higher is “baked, peel not eaten, with meat.” This isolates density, not ingredient causation.

Discriminator

2.9 g protein gap per 100 g

Of protein, fiber, and sodium, the strongest normalized contrast is between “baked, peel not eaten, with butter” (1.9 g) and “baked, peel eaten, with chili” (4.9 g).

Observed source examples

Three landmarks inside this source set—not universal endpoints

The cards are ordered by calories in each record's listed serving. Serving weights differ, so use per-100-gram values to compare composition. These selected records do not define a calorie range for every potato baked peel.

Important: “Lower” begins with Potato, baked, peel eaten; “higher” ends with Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with meat, using each record’s own source amount. Those labels order this selected set only—they are not endpoints for every potato baked peel meal.

Full comparison

Compare every selected FNDDS record

For Potato baked peel, serving columns preserve each record’s own listed amount, while calories per 100 g hold weight constant. A dash means the cited record does not supply that field; it does not mean the nutrient is absent.

On smaller screens, focus the table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

USDA records selected for the Potato baked peel nutrition guide
Exact source record Match Source amount Calories kcal / 100 g Protein Fiber Sodium USDA
Potato, baked, peel eaten Direct name match 285 gUSDA reference amount 265 kcal 93 7.1 g 6.3 g 530 mg FDC 2709524 ↗
Potato, baked, peel eaten, with butter Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 394 kcal 125 7.6 g 6.6 g 639 mg FDC 2709525 ↗
Potato, baked, peel eaten, with cheese Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 482 kcal 153 12.9 g 5.4 g 709 mg FDC 2709527 ↗
Potato, baked, peel eaten, with chili Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 450 kcal 143 15.3 g 6.6 g 816 mg FDC 2709529 ↗
Potato, baked, peel eaten, with meat Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 504 kcal 160 14.9 g 5.4 g 810 mg FDC 2709528 ↗
Potato, baked, peel eaten, with sour cream Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 413 kcal 131 7.8 g 6 g 595 mg FDC 2709526 ↗
Potato, baked, peel eaten, with vegetables Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 447 kcal 142 13 g 6.3 g 718 mg FDC 2709530 ↗
Potato, baked, peel not eaten Direct name match 285 gUSDA reference amount 265 kcal 93 5.6 g 4.3 g 516 mg FDC 2709384 ↗
Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with butter Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 394 kcal 125 6 g 4.4 g 624 mg FDC 2709518 ↗
Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with cheese Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 482 kcal 153 11.5 g 3.8 g 696 mg FDC 2709520 ↗
Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with chili Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 450 kcal 143 14 g 5 g 803 mg FDC 2709522 ↗
Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with meat Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 504 kcal 160 13.6 g 3.8 g 797 mg FDC 2709521 ↗
Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with sour cream Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 413 kcal 131 6.3 g 4.1 g 580 mg FDC 2709519 ↗
Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with vegetables Direct name match 315 gUSDA reference amount 447 kcal 142 11.6 g 4.4 g 706 mg FDC 2709523 ↗

Portion analysis

Serving total and calorie density answer different questions

The listed source amounts run from 285 to 315 grams—a 30-gram gap before composition enters the comparison. Their own source servings run from 265 calories for “baked, peel eaten” to 504 for “baked, peel not eaten, with meat.” At a fixed 100 grams, “baked, peel eaten” is 93 calories and “baked, peel not eaten, with meat” is 160—a fixed-weight separation of 67 calories. For Potato baked peel, the serving view answers “how much is in the database portion?”; the 100-gram view answers “how concentrated is the matched record?” Neither reveals how many grams were actually eaten.

The scaling rule: multiply a per-100-gram value by eaten grams ÷ 100. The arithmetic is exact; the result is only as defensible as the record match and portion estimate.

Preparation analysis

The long description carries the evidence

The published descriptions distinguish forms such as “baked, peel eaten”, “baked, peel eaten, with chili”, “baked, peel not eaten”, “baked, peel not eaten, with chili”, and “baked, peel not eaten, with vegetables”. Across the source formulations, the shared backbone includes salt, table; differentiating rows include butter, stick, salted, cheese, cheddar, potatoes, baked, flesh and skin, without salt, and potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt. On this Potato baked peel page, those rows make the records inspectable, but they are not a controlled experiment: they cannot tell us that one named input, by itself, caused a nutrient difference.

Database precision is not meal certainty. Retain the exact description beside the number so later corrections remain possible.

What changes the comparison

Four drivers worth checking before choosing a record

The family label “Potato baked peel” cannot resolve the differences between Potato, baked, peel eaten and Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with vegetables. The four checks below identify the record wording, source weight, and formulation evidence that can.

  1. 01

    Source weight before serving calories

    The source amounts span 285–315 grams. Compare per 100 grams before reading a serving-calorie gap as a composition gap.

  2. 02

    The words that split the family

    Representative record-level distinctions include “baked, peel eaten”, “baked, peel eaten, with chili”, “baked, peel not eaten”, “baked, peel not eaten, with chili”, and “baked, peel not eaten, with vegetables”. Those phrases are evidence for choosing a record, not decorative subtitle text.

  3. 03

    Formulation evidence, with limits

    Shared source rows include salt, table; rows that vary across the set include butter, stick, salted, cheese, cheddar, and potatoes, baked, flesh and skin, without salt. Presence is inspectable evidence, not proof of nutrient causation.

  4. 04

    The unresolved plate

    Even “Potato, baked, peel eaten” leaves the eaten grams and unnamed oils, sauces, toppings, substitutions, or leftovers unresolved. Preserve those Potato baked peel unknowns for correction instead of converting them into false precision.

Record matching

Match identity first; scale quantity second

Read the source name as a sequence of decisions. First confirm that potato baked peel is the right meal family. Then resolve the phrases that actually separate this set—“baked, peel eaten”, “baked, peel eaten, with meat”, “baked, peel not eaten, with cheese”, and “baked, peel not eaten, with vegetables”—before comparing gram weight. If a package, menu, or known recipe provides a closer first-party description, prefer it and keep this USDA record as a transparent fallback.

A practical matching checklist

  1. Read the complete Potato baked peel source description, including preparation and additions.
  2. Compare the listed source weight with the amount actually eaten.
  3. Prefer a current package or restaurant source when a specific branded item is known.
  4. Record toppings, sauces, cooking fat, sides, and substitutions that the selected description does not name.

Decision support from the exact records on this page

Turn source data into a better next decision

These conclusions and reading paths are computed from 14 exact records behind Potato baked peel source-record guide. Links are chosen by record identity, controlled contrast, formulation input, nutrient spread, or serving context—not by loose keyword similarity.

Equal-weight result

Potato, baked, peel eaten, with meat is higher in total fat per 100 g

Potato, baked, peel eaten, with meat reports 8.3 g versus 0.1 g for Potato, baked, peel not eaten: a 8.2 g difference when both are normalized to 100 g.

Inspect the underlying evidence

The denominator changes the answer

Potato, baked, peel eaten is denser; Potato, baked, peel eaten, with sour cream is higher in its source amount

Potato, baked, peel eaten reports 2.5 g per 100 g and 7.1 g in USDA source amount (285 g). Potato, baked, peel eaten, with sour cream reports a lower 2.5 g per 100 g but a higher 7.8 g in USDA source amount (315 g).

Record identity is part of the estimate

Distinguish “Potato, baked, peel eaten” from “Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with vegetables”

These are separate USDA records with separate formulations or survey descriptions. Match preparation, additions, and the named household amount before borrowing either record’s nutrients.

Inspect the underlying evidence

Contextual knowledge graph

Follow the relationship that matches your question

For Potato baked peel source-record guide, each path states why the destination belongs here, so you can distinguish a true evidentiary connection from a merely similar label.

Test a nearby record choice Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with butter vs Potato, canned, no added fat

Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with butter is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: baked, roasted, or broiled versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path Test a nearby record choice Potato, baked, peel eaten, with butter vs Potato, canned, no added fat

Potato, baked, peel eaten, with butter is held as one side of the comparison. The explicit record-description contrast is Preparation wording: baked, roasted, or broiled versus No matching controlled term in the source name; it is a selection cue, not evidence of cause.

Follow this evidence path 14 context records in this source topic White potatoes, baked or boiled

Potato, baked, peel eaten and Potato, baked, peel eaten, with butter belong to this USDA source-category collection. Its displayed ranges and complete exact-record catalog provide the peer set for a manual comparison; the destination does not preselect this page’s record.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Butter, stick, salted

USDA input 1001 appears in 12 of 14 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 15–15 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path A formulation detail that separates records Cheese, cheddar

USDA input 1009 appears in 8 of 14 context records; its summed listed input weight spans 28–28 g across those source formulations. These are source-formulation input weights, not plated or serving weights. Follow the code to inspect every represented occurrence.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Calcium: density and serving context

In this page’s records, calcium runs from 5 mg in Potato, baked, peel not eaten to 77 mg in Potato, baked, peel eaten, with cheese, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path Put the observed spread in corpus context Iron: density and serving context

In this page’s records, iron runs from 0.3 mg in Potato, baked, peel not eaten, with cheese to 1.1 mg in Potato, baked, peel eaten, with chili, all per 100 g.

Follow this evidence path