Mixed disheshigher variability

Beef curry calories: 271 per 1 cup (240 g)

This exact USDA record reports 271 calories for 1 cup (240 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.

Quick facts

1 cup · 240 g

Calories
271 kcal
Protein
18.2 g
Carbohydrate
15.7 g
Total fat
15.8 g
Fiber
3.4 g
Sodium
862 mg

Portion calculator

Estimate your portion

Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.

Preparation and portion

Named measures come from this exact source record.

Estimated for 1 cup · 240 g

271calories

Beef curry

Protein
18.2 g
Carbs
15.7 g
Fat
15.8 g

These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.

FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS) · FDC 2706388

Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources

The editorial read

The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity

Portion: the cited record reports about 271 calories for 1 cup at 240 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 113 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.

Composition: that source amount also reports 18.2 g protein, 3.4 g fiber, and 862 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.

Identity: the largest listed formulation input is curry sauce, representing 39% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 5 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.

The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 cup at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.

Record-specific decision brief

What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you

This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706388: “Beef curry.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.

01 · Portion arithmetic

Three weights, one fixed composition

For FDC 2706388, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.

Three gram-weight scenarios calculated from this exact USDA nutrient record
ScenarioWeightEnergyProteinFiberSodium
75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 180 g 203 kcal 13.6 g 2.5 g 646 mg
1 cupUSDA-listed household measure 240 g 271 kcal 18.2 g 3.4 g 862 mg
125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight 300 g 339 kcal 22.7 g 4.2 g 1,077 mg

02 · Fixed-weight context

Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes

The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “lower quarter” describes FDC 2706388’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.

Energy

lower quarter

113 kcalthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
134 kcal
Middle 50%
126–156 kcal

Based on 197 records reporting energy.

Protein

middle half

7.6 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
8.1 g
Middle 50%
6.4–12.1 g

Based on 197 records reporting protein.

Dietary fiber

middle half

1.4 gthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
0.9 g
Middle 50%
0.6–1.4 g

Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.

Sodium

middle half

359 mgthis record per 100 g

Corpus median
316 mg
Middle 50%
305–412 mg

Based on 197 records reporting sodium.

03 · FDA label lens

The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals

At FDC 2706388’s 240 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Vitamin C; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Sodium. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.

Strength-side signals

Vitamin C21 mg

≈ 24% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Iron3 mg

≈ 15% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Tradeoff-side signals

Sodium862 mg

≈ 37% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

Saturated fat4.3 g

≈ 21% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.

04 · Highest-impact checks

The three levers most worth resolving first

For “Beef curry,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706389 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.

  1. 01

    Portion sensitivity around 240 g

    A 25% weight move in either direction spans 180–300 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 203 kcal and 339 kcal.

  2. 02

    Record choice: compare with FDC 2706389

    At an equal 100 g, this record has 8.6 g less carbohydrate than “Beef curry with rice.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.

  3. 03

    Formulation anchor: Curry sauce

    The source formulation has 5 input rows; Curry sauce supplies 39% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.

05 · Exact-record choice

Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name

Keep this record when the exact wording “Beef curry” fits. Inspect FDC 2706389 when the exact wording “Beef curry with rice” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.

Keep this profile when these fields fit

Beef curry

Exact source wording
“Beef curry”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706388 · FNDDS 27116100
Source inputs unique in this pair
Curry sauce · Vegetables as ingredient in curry · Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, all grades, cooked, braised

Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better

Beef curry with rice

Exact source wording
“Beef curry with rice”
Source identity
USDA FDC 2706389 · FNDDS 27116110
Source inputs unique in this pair
Beef curry · Rice, cooked, NFS

06 · Continue with purpose

The next pages answer different follow-up questions

Choose the closest description

Which USDA record fits your meal?

Begin with the exact USDA description, then compare preparation, additions, and gram weight. A nearby record is useful only when its identity is closer—not simply because its name sounds familiar.

On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.

Nearby USDA records compared with this exact food description
Exact recordSource servingCalories / 100 gProtein / 100 gFat / 100 gFiber / 100 gSodium / 100 g
This recordBeef curry 240 g271 kcal 113 kcal 7.6 g 6.6 g 1.4 g 359 mg
Beef curry with rice 200 g238 kcal 119 kcal 5.6 g 4.1 g 1 g 314 mg
Guisada, beef 255 g293 kcal 115 kcal 10.8 g 6.6 g 0.5 g 305 mg
Stew, beef 255 g273 kcal 107 kcal 8.8 g 5.1 g 1.3 g 307 mg
Beef burgundy 183 g271 kcal 148 kcal 18.5 g 6 g 0.8 g 369 mg
Beef stroganoff 192 g288 kcal 150 kcal 10.1 g 9.3 g 0.7 g 458 mg
Beef with gravy 183 g285 kcal 156 kcal 21.6 g 7.1 g 0 g 360 mg

How to compare FDC 2706388: its source amount is 240 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.

Household measures

Compare listed portions

For FDC 2706388, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.

1 cup

271 kcal

240 g

At a glance

Nutrient signals in the source amount

For FDC 2706388, Sodium is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.

Sodium

861.6 mg≈ 38% Daily Value

Vitamin C

21.4 mg≈ 24% Daily Value

The percentages above apply to FDC 2706388’s 240 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗

Why FDC 2706388 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 18.2 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.

Source-serving signals

What stands out in this record

These 2 calculated observations describe FDC 2706388 at 240 g—not a measured or recommended plate.

  • The representative USDA portion supplies 3.4 g dietary fiber, about 12% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
  • The representative USDA portion contains 862 mg sodium, about 38% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.

Nutrition facts

Compare the source serving with 100 grams

Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 240 g.

Nutrient amounts for the selected source serving or 100 grams
NutrientAmountApprox. % Daily Value
Calories 271 kcal Not established
Protein 18.2 g Not shown
Carbohydrate 15.7 g 6%
Total fat 15.8 g 20%
Dietary fiber 3.4 g 12%
Sugars 6.1 g Not established
Sodium 861.6 mg 37%
Saturated fat 4.3 g 21%
Monounsaturated Fat 6.2 g Not established
Polyunsaturated Fat 4.3 g Not established
Cholesterol 48 mg 16%
Potassium 691.2 mg 15%
Calcium 48 mg 4%
Iron 2.8 mg 15%
Magnesium 40.8 mg 10%
Vitamin C 21.4 mg 24%
Vitamin D 0 µg 0%
Vitamin A 112.8 µg 13%
Caffeine 0 mg Not established
Alcohol 0 g Not established
Water 186.7 g Not established

For FDC 2706388, approximate percentages divide the displayed 240 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.

Inside the source record

Source formulation behind this USDA record

USDA links FDC 2706388 to 5 source inputs totaling 102.5 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Beef curry” inspectable beside similarly named records.

How to read this

5 listed components

The largest listed inputs by source weight are Curry sauce, Vegetables as ingredient in curry, Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, all grades, cooked, braised. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.

102.5 g total listed input weight across the formulation.

USDA source inputs listed for this exact survey-food record
#USDA inputListed amountInput weightShare of listed input weight
1 Curry sauceUSDA ingredient 81312100 · encyclopedia page available 40 GM 40 g 39%
2 Vegetables as ingredient in curryUSDA ingredient 99997810 40 GM 40 g 39%
3 Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, all grades, cooked, braisedUSDA ingredient 23090 20 GM 20 g 19.5%
4 Vegetable oil, NFSUSDA ingredient 82101000 · encyclopedia page available 2 GM 2 g 2%
5 Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available 0.5 GM 0.5 g 0.5%

Use this formulation to choose a closer record—not to reverse-engineer a recipe. If your meal adds, removes, or substantially changes one of these components, another source entry or a photo-based estimate may fit better.

USDA shorthand in this evidence
  • NFS means “not further specified.” The record intentionally leaves the exact subtype, size, or preparation unresolved.

Exact-record context

What makes this USDA record distinct?

For FDC 2706388, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.

Exact nutrient values per 100 grams
NutrientThis recordComparison recordDifference
Calories113 kcal119 kcal−6 kcal
Protein7.6 g5.6 g+2 g
Carbohydrate6.5 g15.1 g−8.6 g
Total fat6.6 g4.1 g+2.5 g
Dietary fiber1.4 g1 g+0.4 g
Sodium359 mg314 mg+45 mg

Plain-English read

At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 2 g more protein, 8.6 g less carbohydrate, and 2.5 g more total fat than “Beef curry with rice.”

Only this record lists Curry sauce; Vegetables as ingredient in curry; Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, all grades, cooked, braised; Vegetable oil, NFS. Only the comparison record lists Beef curry; Rice, cooked, NFS. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.

3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.

Formulation evidence

The listed formulations differ

The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.

Listed only in this record: Curry sauce; Vegetables as ingredient in curry; Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, all grades, cooked, braised; Vegetable oil, NFS; and 1 more.

Listed only in the comparison: Beef curry; Rice, cooked, NFS.

Portion evidence

The listed portion sets differ

This record’s reference amount is 240 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (240 g).

The comparison record’s reference amount is 200 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 cup (200 g).

Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706388 with FDC 2706389 at equal mass; use their 240 g and 200 g source amounts only for portion matching.

Evidence boundary: FDC 2706388 versus FDC 2706389 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.

Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →

Uncertainty, made actionable

What can change this estimate?

This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.

For “Beef curry,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.

  1. 01

    amount served

    When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.

  2. 02

    recipe and ingredient ratios

    Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.

  3. 03

    added cooking fat

    Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.

  4. 04

    sauces and toppings

    Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.

How we estimated this

The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point

FDC 2706388 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 113 kcal per 100 g becomes 271 kcal at 240 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.

About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 cup has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.

Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024

FoodData Central ID: 2706388

FNDDS food code: 27116100

The scaling for FDC 2706388 can be exact while the match to “Beef curry” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 240 g weight, 5-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.

Open the source record ↗

Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.