Energy
upper quarter195 kcalthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 134 kcal
- Middle 50%
- 126–156 kcal
Based on 197 records reporting energy.
Mixed disheshigher variability
Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato sauce calories: 261 per 1 beef roll (134 g)
This exact USDA record reports 261 calories for 1 beef roll (134 g). That answer belongs to this description and weight; it is not a universal value for every meal that shares the name.
Exact USDA description: Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce
Quick facts
1 beef roll · 134 g
- Calories
- 261 kcal
- Protein
- 27.6 g
- Carbohydrate
- 8.9 g
- Total fat
- 12.2 g
- Fiber
- 0.9 g
- Sodium
- 470 mg
Portion calculator
Estimate your portion
Choose a source measure or enter the weight you ate.
Estimated for 1 beef roll · 134 g
261calories
Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce
- Protein
- 27.6 g
- Carbs
- 8.9 g
- Fat
- 12.2 g
— means the source has no value available.
These values scale the selected reference food by weight. Ingredients, preparation, and portion size can change your meal’s estimate.
Nutrition facts, household measures, preparation notes and USDA sources
The editorial read
The useful answer has a weight, a composition, and an identity
Portion: the cited record reports about 261 calories for 1 beef roll at 134 grams. On a fixed-weight basis, the same record contains 195 calories per 100 grams. The first number answers a portion question; the second answers a concentration question.
Composition: that source amount also reports 27.6 g protein, 0.9 g fiber, and 470 mg sodium. Read those values together: a calorie total by itself cannot describe the nutrient profile.
Identity: the largest listed formulation input is beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled, representing 66.2% of the record’s listed input weight. The record contains 7 source-input rows in all. These are provenance for a standardized calculation, not a recipe for your plate.
The source calls its underlying survey portion “Quantity not specified,” but it separately lists 1 beef roll at the identical weight. We use the familiar household label here without changing the source calculation.
Record-specific decision brief
What the numbers say—and what choice still belongs to you
This analysis belongs to USDA FDC 2706733: “Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce.” It separates gram-weight arithmetic, corpus context, label signals, and record selection so one number does not have to answer four different questions.
01 · Portion arithmetic
Three weights, one fixed composition
For FDC 2706733, each row multiplies the published per-100-gram values by its stated weight. “75% of the reference weight” through “125% of the reference weight” are weight scenarios: named measures come from USDA, while percentage labels are transparent arithmetic.
| Scenario | Weight | Energy | Protein | Fiber | Sodium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight | 100.5 g | 196 kcal | 20.7 g | 0.7 g | 353 mg |
| 1 beef rollUSDA-listed household measure | 134 g | 261 kcal | 27.6 g | 0.9 g | 470 mg |
| 125% of the reference weightArithmetic scenario from the reference weight | 167.5 g | 327 kcal | 34.5 g | 1.2 g | 588 mg |
02 · Fixed-weight context
Where 100 grams sits inside Meat mixed dishes
The comparison set contains 197 exact records in the Meat mixed dishes USDA category. Here, “upper quarter” describes FDC 2706733’s energy position in that corpus—not nutritional quality, desirability, or a health rating.
Protein
upper quarter20.6 gthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 8.1 g
- Middle 50%
- 6.4–12.1 g
Based on 197 records reporting protein.
Dietary fiber
middle half0.7 gthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 0.9 g
- Middle 50%
- 0.6–1.4 g
Based on 197 records reporting dietary fiber.
Sodium
middle half351 mgthis record per 100 g
- Corpus median
- 316 mg
- Middle 50%
- 305–412 mg
Based on 197 records reporting sodium.
03 · FDA label lens
The strongest strength-side and tradeoff-side signals
At FDC 2706733’s 134 g reference weight, the largest strength-side percentage among the nutrients evaluated here is Iron; the larger tradeoff-side percentage is Saturated fat. Percentages use FDA label Daily Values, whose general “high” guide begins at 20% Daily Value. This is not an overall score or a personalized target.
Strength-side signals
Iron3 mg
≈ 16% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Vitamin A123.3 µg
≈ 14% DV. This does not cross the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Tradeoff-side signals
Saturated fat4.5 g
≈ 23% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
Sodium470 mg
≈ 20% DV. This crosses the FDA’s 20% ‘high’ guide.
04 · Highest-impact checks
The three levers most worth resolving first
For “Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce,” the first-pass checks follow the evidence actually published: its named weights, the FDC 2706500 alternative, and its source-formulation identity.
- 01
Portion sensitivity around 134 g
A 25% weight move in either direction spans 100.5–167.5 g. When composition is held constant, those endpoints calculate to 196 kcal and 327 kcal.
- 02
Record choice: compare with FDC 2706500
At an equal 100 g, this record has 6.8 g more protein than “Meat loaf made with beef, with tomato-based sauce.” That is a record-level contrast; it does not identify which ingredient caused the difference.
- 03
Formulation anchor: Beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled
The source formulation has 7 input rows; Beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled supplies 66.2% of listed input weight. Those are standardized formulation inputs, not final plated percentages.
05 · Exact-record choice
Select by literal evidence, not the shortest name
Keep this record when “stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture; tomato-based sauce” fits. Inspect FDC 2706500 when “with tomato-based sauce” is the more literal description of the food and preparation.
Keep this profile when these fields fit
Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce
- Exact source wording
- “Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce”
- Source identity
- USDA FDC 2706733 · FNDDS 27411150
- Named qualifiers
- stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture · tomato-based sauce
- Source inputs unique in this pair
- Beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled · Carrots, cooked, as ingredient · Celery, raw
Inspect this alternative when its fields fit better
Meat loaf made with beef, with tomato-based sauce
- Exact source wording
- “Meat loaf made with beef, with tomato-based sauce”
- Source identity
- USDA FDC 2706500 · FNDDS 27214110
- Named qualifiers
- with tomato-based sauce
- Source inputs unique in this pair
- Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned · Bread, white, commercially prepared · Eggs, Grade A, Large, egg whole
Choose the closest description
Which USDA record fits your meal?
Treat the long description as data. The phrases doing the most work here are “stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture” and “tomato-based sauce”. Match those details first; then compare the database weight with the amount you mean.
On smaller screens, focus a nutrition table and scroll horizontally to read every column.
| Exact record | Source serving | Calories / 100 g | Protein / 100 g | Fat / 100 g | Fiber / 100 g | Sodium / 100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This recordBeef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce | 134 g261 kcal | 195 kcal | 20.6 g | 9.1 g | 0.7 g | 351 mg |
| Meat loaf made with beef, with tomato-based sauce | 108 g172 kcal | 159 kcal | 13.8 g | 8.4 g | 0.7 g | 429 mg |
| Beef with tomato-based sauce | 187 g279 kcal | 149 kcal | 21.7 g | 6.4 g | 0.4 g | 363 mg |
| Meat with tomato-based sauce | 187 g279 kcal | 149 kcal | 21.7 g | 6.4 g | 0.4 g | 355 mg |
| Meat loaf made with beef and pork, with tomato-based sauce | 108 g170 kcal | 157 kcal | 13.6 g | 8.2 g | 0.7 g | 426 mg |
| Beef and rice with tomato-based sauce | 305 g415 kcal | 136 kcal | 6.4 g | 5.2 g | 0.7 g | 308 mg |
| Beef and noodles with tomato-based sauce | 311 g358 kcal | 115 kcal | 8.7 g | 3.9 g | 0.4 g | 274 mg |
How to compare FDC 2706733: its source amount is 134 g; every 100-gram column removes portion size from the record-to-record comparison. Neither denominator determines your plate’s weight or recipe.
Household measures
Compare listed portions
For FDC 2706733, the 1 displayed measure scale the same source composition by gram weight; rounding changes presentation, not the underlying ratio.
1 beef roll
261 kcal
134 g
At a glance
Nutrient signals in the source amount
For FDC 2706733, Cholesterol is the largest displayed non-protein Daily Value signal. Read the set as label context—not a personalized score.
Cholesterol
75 mg≈ 25% Daily ValueSaturated fat
4.5 g≈ 23% Daily ValueThe percentages above apply to FDC 2706733’s 134 g reference amount. FDA Daily Values are general label references, not individualized energy or medical targets. Read the FDA explanation ↗
Why FDC 2706733 has no protein percentage here: Feast reports 27.6 g, but does not present grams divided by 50 as FDA protein %DV; applicable label rules account for protein quality and regulatory context.
Source-serving signals
What stands out in this record
These 1 calculated observation describe FDC 2706733 at 134 g—not a measured or recommended plate.
- The representative USDA portion contains 470 mg sodium, about 20% of the Daily Value used on U.S. labels.
Nutrition facts
Compare the source serving with 100 grams
Values are rounded for readability. The source serving is 134 g.
| Nutrient | Amount | Approx. % Daily Value |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 261 kcal 195 kcal | Not established Not established |
| Protein | 27.6 g 20.6 g | Not shown Not shown |
| Carbohydrate | 8.9 g 6.6 g | 3% 2% |
| Total fat | 12.2 g 9.1 g | 16% 12% |
| Dietary fiber | 0.9 g 0.7 g | 3% 3% |
| Sugars | 1.6 g 1.2 g | Not established Not established |
| Sodium | 470.3 mg 351 mg | 20% 15% |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g 3.4 g | 23% 17% |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 5.1 g 3.8 g | Not established Not established |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 0.6 g 0.4 g | Not established Not established |
| Cholesterol | 75 mg 56 mg | 25% 19% |
| Potassium | 509.2 mg 380 mg | 11% 8% |
| Calcium | 17.4 mg 13 mg | 1% 1% |
| Iron | 3 mg 2.2 mg | 16% 12% |
| Magnesium | 32.2 mg 24 mg | 8% 6% |
| Vitamin C | 2.1 mg 1.6 mg | 2% 2% |
| Vitamin D | 0.3 µg 0.2 µg | 1% 1% |
| Vitamin A | 123.3 µg 92 µg | 14% 10% |
| Caffeine | 0 mg 0 mg | Not established Not established |
| Alcohol | 0 g 0 g | Not established Not established |
| Water | 81.6 g 60.9 g | Not established Not established |
For FDC 2706733, approximate percentages divide the displayed 134 g amount by FDA label Daily Values; they are not personalized targets. “Not established” means FDA sets no Daily Value for that row. Protein %DV remains unshown because adult-label use depends on regulatory context.
Inside the source record
Source formulation behind this USDA record
USDA links FDC 2706733 to 7 source inputs totaling 772 g in its standardized formulation. Publishing that exact provenance makes “Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce” inspectable beside similarly named records.
How to read this
7 listed components
The largest listed inputs by source weight are Beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled, Carrots, cooked, as ingredient, Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean only, heated, roasted. The order and weights below come from the standardized USDA formulation, so they offer context for this exact database entry.
772 g total listed input weight across the formulation.
| # | USDA input | Listed amount | Input weight | Share of listed input weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiledUSDA ingredient 13865 | 511 GM | 511 g | 66.2% |
| 2 | Carrots, cooked, as ingredientUSDA ingredient 99997310 · encyclopedia page available | 81 GM | 81 g | 10.5% |
| 3 | Celery, rawUSDA ingredient 11143 · encyclopedia page available | 40 GM | 40 g | 5.2% |
| 4 | Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)USDA ingredient 11546 · encyclopedia page available | 32 GM | 32 g | 4.1% |
| 5 | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean only, heated, roastedUSDA ingredient 10879 · encyclopedia page available | 60 GM | 60 g | 7.8% |
| 6 | Flour, wheat, all-purpose, enriched, bleachedUSDA ingredient 20081 · encyclopedia page available | 44 GM | 44 g | 5.7% |
| 7 | Salt, tableUSDA ingredient 2047 · encyclopedia page available | 4 GM | 4 g | 0.5% |
Exact-record context
What makes this USDA record distinct?
For FDC 2706733, the close-record rule searches the USDA “Meat mixed dishes” category for shared description terms or source inputs. Any surviving pair is compared per 100 grams, so unlike source-serving sizes cannot manufacture the nutrient difference.
This record
Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce
- USDA category
- Meat mixed dishes
- FDC ID
- 2706733
- FNDDS code
- 27411150
Closest inspectable record
Meat loaf made with beef, with tomato-based sauce
- USDA category
- Meat mixed dishes
- FDC ID
- 2706500
- FNDDS code
- 27214110
| Nutrient | This record | Comparison record | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 195 kcal | 159 kcal | +36 kcal |
| Protein | 20.6 g | 13.8 g | +6.8 g |
| Carbohydrate | 6.6 g | 6.8 g | −0.2 g |
| Total fat | 9.1 g | 8.4 g | +0.7 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0.7 g | 0.7 g | Same listed value |
| Sodium | 351 mg | 429 mg | −78 mg |
Plain-English read
At the fixed 100-gram basis, this record lists 36 more calories, 6.8 g more protein, and 78 mg less sodium than “Meat loaf made with beef, with tomato-based sauce.”
Only this record lists Beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled; Carrots, cooked, as ingredient; Celery, raw; Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program). Only the comparison record lists Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned; Bread, white, commercially prepared; Eggs, Grade A, Large, egg whole; Onions, raw. Those formulation rows identify different source records; they do not prove which input caused a nutrient difference.
3 of the six displayed differences clear the documented materiality screen. It is a reading aid, not a health rating.
Formulation evidence
The listed formulations differ
The formulation rows differ, but the source data do not isolate which component caused any nutrient difference. Input weights describe the standardized formulation—not final plated proportions.
Shared listed inputs: Salt, table.
Listed only in this record: Beef, round, full cut, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled; Carrots, cooked, as ingredient; Celery, raw; Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program); and 2 more.
Listed only in the comparison: Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, crumbles, cooked, pan-browned; Bread, white, commercially prepared; Eggs, Grade A, Large, egg whole; Onions, raw; and 3 more.
Portion evidence
The listed portion sets differ
This record’s reference amount is 134 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 beef roll (134 g).
The comparison record’s reference amount is 108 g; a familiar listed measure is 1 small or thin slice (109 g).
Use the 100-gram row to compare FDC 2706733 with FDC 2706500 at equal mass; use their 134 g and 108 g source amounts only for portion matching.
Evidence boundary: FDC 2706733 versus FDC 2706500 is a comparison of standardized source records—not a measurement of your meal, an overall food-quality rank, or proof that one input caused a difference.
Review the full meat mixed dishes source category → Read the calculation and selection methodology →
Uncertainty, made actionable
What can change this estimate?
This is a standardized USDA survey-food profile, not a measurement of every preparation. Actual nutrition can change with amount served, recipe and ingredient ratios, added cooking fat, sauces and toppings.
For “Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce,” resolve amount served first, then move through the remaining 3 published levers. Unknowns should remain visible rather than expanding every assumption at once.
- 01
amount served
When composition is held constant, nutrient totals scale directly with grams. A 20% weight correction produces the same 20% correction to the scaled totals.
- 02
recipe and ingredient ratios
Prefer a package, menu, or known recipe when it identifies the food more precisely. Otherwise preserve the generic record as an explicit approximation.
- 03
added cooking fat
Match the named cooking-fat state when possible. Fat used, retained, or left behind is preparation information that a dish name alone cannot recover.
- 04
sauces and toppings
Check whether the exact source description already includes it. If not, keep the addition separate rather than silently folding it into the base record.
How we estimated this
The arithmetic is simple; the provenance is the point
FDC 2706733 comes from FoodData Central Survey Foods (FNDDS). Its 195 kcal per 100 g becomes 261 kcal at 134 g through nutrient per portion = nutrient per 100 g × portion grams ÷ 100; this page adds no second nutrition estimate.
About the serving label: USDA describes the underlying survey portion as “Quantity not specified.” The separately listed 1 beef roll has the same gram weight, so the familiar label can be shown without changing the calculation.
Data cycle: 2021–2023, published October 31, 2024
FoodData Central ID: 2706733
FNDDS food code: 27411150
The scaling for FDC 2706733 can be exact while the match to “Beef rolls, stuffed with vegetables or meat mixture, tomato-based sauce” is wrong. That is why this profile keeps its 134 g weight, 7-row source formulation, and selection uncertainty beside the arithmetic.
Source release October 31, 2024. Review USDA’s data-type documentation ↗ · Read Feast’s full nutrition methodology.